Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Hold Senate, G.O.P. Bolsters Its Most Liberal
NYTimes ^ | 9/10/2006 | Adam Nagourney

Posted on 09/09/2006 1:10:22 PM PDT by RustMartialis

To Hold Senate, G.O.P. Bolsters Its Most Liberal
By ADAM NAGOURNEY
Published: September 10, 2006

WARWICK, R.I., Sept. 9 -- With a barrage of television advertisements and the mobilization of its get-out-the-vote machine, the national Republican Party has lined up to beat back a conservative primary challenge to the most liberal Republican in the Senate, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island. The outcome on Tuesday could help determine whether Democrats have a shot at taking back the Senate.

In an extraordinary pre-emptive announcement, the National Republican Senatorial Committee has said it will concede Rhode Island to the Democrats should Stephen Laffey, the mayor of Cranston, defeat Mr. Chafee in the primary.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2006; betrayal; congress; surrender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-148 next last
To: oceanview
So you are telling me that we should basically say "hey, the Dems can't win the senate, so let's toss Chaffee and give up on Kean Jr.

Kean Jr. said that Rummy should go. I don't think we need senators like that.

61 posted on 09/09/2006 1:38:53 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Yet the President refuses to endorse the Republican candidate or campaign for him or offer any support. Sheer lunacy.

This has always been Karl Rove's modus operandi.

First, back the liberal in the primary. If the liberal wins, back him to the hilt. If the conservative wins, only back him if the conventional wisdom in Washington is that "he can win."

The problem is, in most cases, their predictions become self-fulfilling prophecies...since they're the ones with the resources.

62 posted on 09/09/2006 1:40:35 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ProudCopperhead
ProudCopperhead Since Jul 16, 2006

Democrat please. Think I am going to waste time responding to a transparent Moveon.org stodge? Doubtlessly you think your sign on the very pinnacle of wit. Actually it merely shows how politically and historically ignorant you are.

63 posted on 09/09/2006 1:41:03 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? Samurai? Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldfinch
Some people here would rather be ideologically pure and out of power then to make the compromises needed to retain a majority and exercise power.

That's a bunch of horse feces and you know it.

We're not asking Chafee to be a Tancredo. Hell I wouldn't mind it if he were liberal on social issues such as abortion and gay marriage, considering the state/region he represents.

But he's a TOTAL LIBERAL on everything. I mean, he voted against the Bush tax cuts and the WOT. Republicans are at least supposed to be strong on fiscal and national security issues, but Chafee is not. Don't you think that's a little too far?

64 posted on 09/09/2006 1:41:17 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
So is Kathleen Harris in Florida.

Now, now...that's a thread for another day :-)

65 posted on 09/09/2006 1:42:16 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

don't tell me Chaffee is some kind of "satan" - OK, he's not a conservative, but he's not the devil. we get a few votes out of him (he voted for Roberts), he votes to organize the senate with us.

electing Chaffee and Kean Jr, enables other good senators like Coburn and others on our side - to be in the majority. that's the way you have to look at it, you have to look at each race individually.


66 posted on 09/09/2006 1:43:43 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RustMartialis

The Republican grassroots needs to rise up and give the RNC muckety mucks the Robespierre treatment.


67 posted on 09/09/2006 1:44:44 PM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
even if it means throwing the likes of Chaffee overboard?

Lest we forget the likes of Olympia Snowe or Susan Collins also.

All in all, it boils down to the mindset of the voters and if a politician concedes their values just to cater to the whim of the voters then the inmates are running the asylum.

Both parties are guilty of this however with the Dem's in most cases they agree with the inmates.

68 posted on 09/09/2006 1:44:59 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

we can't replay the CT republican primary now - the race is set, we have to deal with reality.


69 posted on 09/09/2006 1:45:02 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RustMartialis
Can anyone explain why the GOP is supporting Chaffee so strongly and trying to torpedo Katherine Harris?

Harris sometimes says dumb things. Chaffee always does dumb things. Harris rides horses while Chaffee shoed horses for a living after graduating from Brown. Harris is hot (for a 49 year old) while Chaffee looks like a dork.

Most importantly, Harris consistently supports GOP and conservative causes while Chaffee opposes them.

Chaffee has the exact same American Conservative Union rating for 2005 (12%) as Hiliary Clinton.
70 posted on 09/09/2006 1:47:14 PM PDT by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

is Santorum being starved for money by the RNC? if that case can be made, then of course you are correct.


71 posted on 09/09/2006 1:47:42 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
An assumption completely unproveable by any available data.

What did the article say, 15% registered Republicans? That seems like provable data. And, in previous elections, Chaffee has already demonstrated that a Democrat wannabe can beat a Democrat.

72 posted on 09/09/2006 1:49:53 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RustMartialis

Stuff lke this helps me understand the fury of the libs regarding Lieberman. It prooved that the big wigs on both sides are full of it.


73 posted on 09/09/2006 1:50:03 PM PDT by Scarchin (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RustMartialis

All my campaign contributions go to the Club For Growth, so they can try to send clowns like Chaffee packing. I will never, ever send money to the RNC or congressional PACs again.


74 posted on 09/09/2006 1:52:22 PM PDT by Sooner1938 (Disgusted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

That's why I kind of hope Lamont wins in CT and shows that grassroots can beat the entrenched party hacks.


75 posted on 09/09/2006 1:52:25 PM PDT by Scarchin (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldfinch
"Some people here would rather be ideologically pure and out of power then to make the compromises needed to retain a majority and exercise power. They are infected with acute LOSER-itis."


Some people would vote for Ted Kennedy if he had an "R" after his name. They would be supporting evil but they could claim "victory". The corrupting influence of power is quite apparent on this thread.
76 posted on 09/09/2006 1:52:37 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
is Santorum being starved for money by the RNC? if that case can be made, then of course you are correct.

Frankly, I don't know. But I can't understand why the RNC would spend money in support of Chaffee in the primary if there are any Republican candidates anywhere else who might benefit from these funds in the general election.

Besides which, if $X improved Chaffee's shot at winning by 10 pts, that's not as valuable to the party as improving Santorum's odds by 2 pts. (Proportion may vary due to individual preference, but you get my point).

77 posted on 09/09/2006 1:53:13 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
he voted for Roberts

BFD, so did 76 other Senators.

Chafee has got to go.

78 posted on 09/09/2006 1:55:05 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Scarchin
That's why I kind of hope Lamont wins in CT and shows that grassroots can beat the entrenched party hacks.

Hate to break the news to ya,but it was democRAT Party hacks who have gotten Lament as far as he's gone up until now.

When it comes to "hacks",Lieberman is the outsider here. Lament has the full support of every single filthy leftist down at DNC Headquarters.

79 posted on 09/09/2006 1:57:04 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Now, now...that's a thread for another day :-)

True. You and I have been down that road on other threads and the one thing that we both agree on is that one of us will be eating a huge meal of crow come November 8th.

80 posted on 09/09/2006 1:57:36 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson