To: Star Traveler; roaddog727
I think you have Feinstein and Feingold confused. Feingold is a "he", but only in the strictly technical anatomical sense.
34 posted on
09/12/2006 8:41:17 AM PDT by
Disambiguator
(Don't mess with Israel.)
To: Disambiguator; Star Traveler
"I think you have Feinstein and Feingold confused. Feingold is a "he", but only in the strictly technical anatomical sense."
My error.
However, in this case, I do believe that they are both androgynous, interchangeable pieces parts. As such, "it" would be more appropriate for both.
36 posted on
09/12/2006 8:46:14 AM PDT by
roaddog727
(Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
To: Disambiguator
You said -- "I think you have Feinstein and Feingold confused. Feingold is a "he", but only in the strictly technical anatomical sense."
Yep, I think I did. But, they're both "stuck on stupid" -- nontheless.
Regards,
Star Traveler
To: Disambiguator
Well he IS a pecker but I'm not sure if he has one anymore. I'd bet dollars to donuts that he has no ballz though.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson