Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FREEPER EXCLUSIVE: TED KENNEDY'S LETTER TO PENDLETON 8 FAMILY: NO HELP FOR YOU!!
a little bird . . . | 09/21/2006 | RaceBannon

Posted on 09/21/2006 5:06:01 PM PDT by RaceBannon

Earlier, I posted an article proclaiming Ted Kennedy's response to one of the families of the 7 Marines and Corpsman known as the Pendleton 8.

This letter is printed with the full permission of the family.

I have finally received a copy of the letter and it is posted below.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: delahunt; kennedy; passthescotch; pendleton8; swimmer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Notice the wording of Kennedy. Due to his membership on the Judiciary committee, he states he is unable to help the family of one of the accused Marines who lives in his home state of Massachusetts.

In simple layman's terms, he recused himself because it would be a conflict of interest to help that family while he serves in his government position other than Senator.

That is one of the worst insults. A powerful Senator who refuses to care for one of his own while claiming that Americans are tortuing terrorists, he refuses to help an Americna Marine who is being railroaded into jail possibly, and Senator Ted Kennedy refuses to help.

Oh, he tried, he forwarded the name of the famly to a legal assistance firm in Boston. This firm responded that they would love to help, but were not specialists in Military law.

THAT is an insult of all insults, Ted Kennedy is a U.S. Navy veteran himself, from a military family with 2 other brothers serving in WWII, and Kennedy sends the information to a firm that he HAD TO KNOW didn't handle military law???

Who does Ted kennedy think he is fooling??

Not me. Nor is he fooling the family of Sgt Hutchins of Plymouth Massachusetts.

1 posted on 09/21/2006 5:06:02 PM PDT by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; Arkan67; pabianice; Lady Jag; UpAndComing; South Shore Mike; C210N; ...

Here is the actual letter


2 posted on 09/21/2006 5:07:02 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

I don't see a connection or a conflict with the judiciary committee and a military court. Does anyone else?


3 posted on 09/21/2006 5:08:24 PM PDT by jdsteel ('nuff said (old Marvel Comics reference....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Will you pass this to Rush, FNC or a MSM that might take this up?
4 posted on 09/21/2006 5:08:55 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Dear Senator, I was caught cheating at Harvard, could you talk to your pals at the Globe about covering it up? Sincerely, You


5 posted on 09/21/2006 5:09:17 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Republican, atheist, pro-life, anti-illegal, book-reading no-goodnik!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

I would blank out the recipient's last name...and repost. Too easy for nuts jobs to find the actual address.


6 posted on 09/21/2006 5:09:26 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel
I don't see a connection or a conflict with the judiciary committee and a military court. Does anyone else?

I do. A military court is subject to judicial oversight, just like a civilian one.

7 posted on 09/21/2006 5:09:45 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Teddy is busy dont bother him....


8 posted on 09/21/2006 5:10:46 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran; All

feel free, I tried, too, many will see it here!


9 posted on 09/21/2006 5:13:03 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

What would you have him do? It would be inappropriate for Kennedy, or any other member of Congress, to interfere in an ongoing military investigation and possible court matial.


10 posted on 09/21/2006 5:13:07 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

guess all his hobnobbing with NARAL/ACLU/AFL-CIO/MoveOn, etc isn't a conflict with his posiiton on the Judiciary Committee ?


11 posted on 09/21/2006 5:13:11 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

If it were someone named Muhammed, he would intervene.
This bloated scumbag always makes me ask.....What the hell is wrong with those Massholes and the reps. they select??
They will never learn and so many suffer their stupidity.


12 posted on 09/21/2006 5:14:15 PM PDT by JerseyDvl ("If you attack Americans, we'll defend your right to do it."- The Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Shouldn't that be "As an United States Senator..."?

13 posted on 09/21/2006 5:14:59 PM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
14 posted on 09/21/2006 5:15:31 PM PDT by AdvisorB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

"What would you have him do?"

Ted should raise the Massachusetts Guard, rescue the boys from California, repatriate them to Massachusetts, and issue Senatorial pardons.

If not that, advise questioner to see a lawyer, which he did.


15 posted on 09/21/2006 5:16:59 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Since when did ANY of the Kennedy's NOT use their POLITICAL positions in legal matters?

This is RICH! JUST RICH!

Not to mention OUTRAGEOUS!


16 posted on 09/21/2006 5:17:09 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (STEVE KING /JOHN BOLTON FOR '08...Ann picks King...I pick Bolton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
he states he is unable to help the family of one of the accused Marines who lives in his home state of Massachusetts.

I doubt he ever saw it.

17 posted on 09/21/2006 5:17:12 PM PDT by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Kennedy speak for "4-Q"


18 posted on 09/21/2006 5:17:48 PM PDT by stm (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

I just figured out your tagline, it took a minute. DOH!!!


19 posted on 09/21/2006 5:19:45 PM PDT by stm (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
I do. A military court is subject to judicial oversight, just like a civilian one.

There is oversight. The men can have civilian counsel and they will be assigned a military counsel as well. Should these men be convicted in a general court martial then their case will be appealed automatically to the Navy Court of Criminal Appeal. If that court upholds the sentence then they can appeal further to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. If that court upholds the lower court rulings then they still have a chance to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Other than that what do you want done?

20 posted on 09/21/2006 5:19:48 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson