Posted on 09/23/2006 8:37:08 PM PDT by STARWISE
FOTFLOL! Same here --- how in the heck are WE supposed to know about the MORNING shows? LOL
Keep in mind that he killed more Waco children than terrorists.
Either one of them, we hope and pray!
I actually hope King Billy Jeff I keeps pointing his finger and showing the dark, angry side of himself. It'll be a major turnoff and a reminder to anyone who would even remotely be pondering a vote for Hillary, the smartest woman, for the White House. To have these two back in power would be the end of the end.
After watching the video again...and again...and again...
I realized that the whole Clinton response was shtick..a scripted, pre-planned act to generate exactly the response it did with their base.
No matter what questions Chris Wallace would have asked, he would have gotten the same response: angry, incensed, belligerant.
Reading the posts on left wing blog sites, what seems to us to be an alternate reality is the reaction these lefties have to a raging, vicious, paranoid Slick. They love him. Slick knew this, and geared his remarks to ginning up his, and Hillary's base.
DU:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/
DAILY KOS:
http://www.dailykos.com/
HUFFINGTON POST:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
You can try and shift the focus to a criticism of GW but it won't fly. This is about many missed opportunities by the Clintons to nab OBL, and they failed miserably.
Bush can be criticized for leaving in place the intelligence people that the Clintons had placed. Bush left it to Tenet to track OBL and AQ while he was trying to get a handle on the power levers of his presidency. He was snowed under by a hostile obstructionist Senate, a growing recession, and a lingering election fiasco, so naturally he would defer to Tenet. But yes he could stand criticism of playing too nice with the Clinton appointees and position holders that were allowed to stay in place.
But history will judge the Clintons much more harshly because contrary to the perjurious ex-President's claim of having tried to get OBL (with a compromised cruise missile attack), he was able to get OBL on several occasions and refused to do so.
You treated terrorism as a LAW ENFORCEMENT problem.. You sent the FBI instead of the military..as you can see it didnt work out too good !
But I WILL be taping the 6:00 PM. EDT FNC show. :-)
"Watch where you put your finger, Billy-Boy!"
Slick Willie is a Switch Hitter Willie when the well is dry for the hetrosexual conquests....I almost feel sorry for Wallace...almost
Tomorrow is antique auction day --- I just might be up early enough to watch the 9:00AM broadcast.
Watching this reminded me of a Hillar-ious clip I saw on youtube...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b96l8boZ_Rs
President Bush didn't treat 9/11 as a local POLICE PROBLEM; but, that's EXACTLY how Clinton treated the '93 bombing of the WTC.
During Clinton's eight years, al Qaeda attacked the WTC, our troops in Somalis, two American embassies in Africa, and blew a hole in the USS COLE. Clinton IGNORED all of that as well as OBL's declaration of war on the USA in 1996. And you call all of that "inept"?
Besides trying to get his presidency up and running, after having be severely hampered and delayed by the Clinonista horde, what, exactly, did President Bush have to deal with in his first eight months and just what, specifically from OBL and/or al Qaeda?
I hope you find a lot of great stuff! :-)
I am buying for my daughter. I have her list....
What's she want? :-)
FREEPERS forget NOTHING! :-)
Marble top tables and a lovely bride's trunk from 1850.
It comes on at 8:00am MDT on local FOX (WNYW-NY) and at 4:00pm MDT on FNC here.
Poor memories can be fatal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.