Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Plan Post-Election Change to Terrorist Alert Levels (vanity)

Posted on 09/24/2006 10:09:32 PM PDT by stockstrader

DEMOCRAT TERRORIST ALERT LEVELS:

1. 'Cut and Run'
2. 'Run and Hide'
3. 'Appease and Capitulate'
4. 'Duck and Cover''
5. 'Surrender and Beg' (Highest alert level)

The democrats are currently campaigning on the promise of changing the color-coded terrorist alert levels to the numerical ones that they strongly prefer listed above (listed from lowest, #1, to highest, #5).

They guarantee implementation of 'Alert level ONE', immediately upon winning control of the congress—-to be followed shortly thereafter by increasing the alert levels to #2, or higher--as soon as the situation warrants.

The DNC promises that these changes are long overdue, much more realistic, immediately achievable, and will not alienate and make more enemies the way that the current system does.


TOPICS: Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: democrats; elections; liberals; wot

1 posted on 09/24/2006 10:09:33 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

The only thing that Democrats fight for is to protect the fallacious 'legacy' of Bill Clinton. Its their 'camelot', and true or not, its all they've got.


2 posted on 09/24/2006 10:11:55 PM PDT by bpjam (Hezbollah, Hamas, Al Qaida - The Religion of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

I would say "LOL" except that this is much closer to the truth, than comfortable.


3 posted on 09/24/2006 10:13:50 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDYes, ER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

It'd be funny if it wasn't true...


4 posted on 09/24/2006 10:13:57 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (What man still doesn't know about God's creation is still enough to fill a universe...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

5 posted on 09/24/2006 10:21:09 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
Yep. That does it. I gotta vote Rat now! Wow. Changing the code from colors to numbers. What a sea change. That aught to make us so safe that...'scuse me, gotta go barf
6 posted on 09/24/2006 10:24:22 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Rumsfeld Use of Word 'Appease' Irks Dems

Sept. 18, 2006

In a speech to the American Legion Convention in Salt Lake City, Secretary Rumsfeld asked “Can we truly afford to believe that somehow, some way, vicious extremists can be appeased?” Inasmuch as the term “appeasement” is widely associated with unsuccessful pre-World War II efforts to deter Adolf Hitler from starting a war, Democratic critics of President Bush’s handling of the war on terror were quick to take offense.

“I never said ‘appease,’” protested Representative John Murtha (D-Penn). “I said we should assuage the fears of the Muslims by pulling our troops out of their countries.”

“Mollify is the term I use,” said Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisc). “I am no appeaser. I am a ‘mollifier.’”

“At first, I was for placating our adversaries,” said Senator John Kerry (D-Mass). “Later I switched to favor propitiation. But now I agree with Senator Feinberg. I think we should mollify them. Parenthetically, if I may interject, they would most likely have been placated, propitiated and/or mollified by now if I had been elected president in 2004. But never, ever would I appease them. Rumsfeld is slandering me.”

“I am no appeaser,” said Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass). “Getting bombed has always struck me as the better option. Rumsfeld needs to apologize and resign.”

“This is almost as bad as the ‘cut-run-surrender’ smear the Republicans have been trying to lay on us,” Howard Dean, Democratic National Committee Chairman, complained. “We never said that. Our position is that the U.S. should disengage, flee and yield. And we aren’t waving a white flag. It’s ‘cream.’”

Thus far, Rumsfeld has declined to apologize, resign, or respond to the Democrats’ complaints. “How can I respond?” Rumsfeld asked. “Their position is incoherent. Appease, mollify, placate, whatever—it’s all the same thing.”

The Democrats’ stance received an endorsement from Iran. "The United States is too weak to prevail over the holy forces of Islam," Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said during a meeting with a visiting Syrian foreign ministry official. “The American people should heed the advice of leaders such as Senator Kerry and Congressman Murtha. It is the only way they can save their necks from the avenging sword of righteous jihad. We are prepared to be mollified, placated or propitiated—or whatever the infidels choose to call it.”

In related news, Iran has also suggested that U.S. troops leave Iraq. “The American occupiers must leave Iraq,” government spokesman Gholam-Hossein Elham said. “Their goals have been achieved. Saddam has been deposed. The weapons of mass destruction threat has been ended. A constitution has been completed. A new government has been elected. The Americans have won. They can go home now.”

read more...

http://www.azconservative.org/Column_Archives.htm


7 posted on 09/24/2006 11:17:48 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

So another words they have been getting their ideas from France.


8 posted on 09/24/2006 11:18:47 PM PDT by YdontUleaveLibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Oh come on! If we had anything to worry about from terrorism, we'd still be being attacked. No attacks; no worries! Get with it. (sarcasm)


9 posted on 09/24/2006 11:23:45 PM PDT by raftguide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

LOL


10 posted on 09/25/2006 4:47:17 AM PDT by tkathy (Einstein: Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Considering the Democats will NOT win the House or Senate, who cares what they think about Colors.


11 posted on 09/25/2006 5:19:15 AM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
These show a shocking similarity to the French threat levels:

1.Run

2.Hide

3.Surrender

4.Collaborate

12 posted on 09/25/2006 5:52:13 AM PDT by Comus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

6. Bend over and enjoy it(Barney Frank)


13 posted on 09/25/2006 11:01:28 AM PDT by rfp1234 (I've had it up to my keyster with these leaks!!! - - - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson