Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Smart Shooter?
Popular Science ^ | September 2006 | Patrick Di Justo

Posted on 09/25/2006 11:42:27 AM PDT by Dr. Zzyzx

A Smart Shooter? Scientists debut a computerized pistol engineered to recognize the grip of its owner

By Patrick Di Justo

Armed with $2 million in federal grants, researchers at the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) are close to perfecting the first commercially viable "smart gun." The prototype pistol, unveiled last month, is designed to recognize specific people's grips. When seized by an unauthorized hand—say, that of a child or a criminal—the gun locks its shooting mechanism. The gun relies on Dynamic Grip Recognition, a biometric technology embedded in its handle. Sensors and microprocessors analyze the complex interplay of bones and muscles involved in pulling the trigger, all in a fraction of a second. "The way you hold a gun, curl your fingers, contract your hand muscles as you pull the trigger—all of those measurements are unique," says Donald Sebastian, vice president for research and development at NJIT.

Gun-safety advocates hail the device as a way to significantly reduce the estimated 29,000 firearm deaths in the U.S. each year, although some gun-rights advocates worry that the technology could prove more error-prone than traditional guns. Sebastian says the NJIT prototype currently has a failure rate of 1 in 100 trigger pulls, but his team aims to improve that rate to 1 in 10,000—the Pentagon's standard for military weapons—by increasing the number of grip sensors from 32 to "hundreds" and further refining the pattern-recognition software. If all goes well, Sebastian expects a commercial version by 2008.

Educating the Smart Gun Users will probably Program the NJIT gun at a local police station's firing range. During the registration process, the owner will test-fire the weapon 10 times. Each trigger pull will activate the pressure sensors embedded in the gun's handle. Microprocessors will analyze the data and create a permanent profile of the user's grip.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; mcgreevey; newjersey; nj; njit; whatexit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
Photo of gun at site of original article.
1 posted on 09/25/2006 11:42:28 AM PDT by Dr. Zzyzx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
Here ya go!


2 posted on 09/25/2006 11:44:29 AM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

So what tiny fraction of those 29,000 deaths, the majority of which are gang and drug related murders, would be prevented by this?


3 posted on 09/25/2006 11:45:15 AM PDT by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

4 posted on 09/25/2006 11:47:07 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

Great.

Bad guy enters my home and kills me. My wife can't use my gun to kill him. Lovely.

Of course.... there's both pistols and long guns on *both* sides of the bed, so it's a moot point.


5 posted on 09/25/2006 11:47:25 AM PDT by Terabitten (Deus Vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

no batteries = no boom??

sounds retarded to me..you can still pistol whip the snot out of someone with it...


My S&W 5906 will not fire when in an "unauthorized hand"... it's called a "mag disconnect" if it comes to a fist fight the mag release gets bumped and the mag comes out... then it's click click click.... no go. Oops whatch out for my ASP baton across your wrist...


6 posted on 09/25/2006 11:47:35 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

This is bad news and a complete waste of our tax dollars.


7 posted on 09/25/2006 11:48:04 AM PDT by Southern Partisan ("Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less." ----R. E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
Or you could just teach children gun safety and shoot criminals before they get your gun.
8 posted on 09/25/2006 11:48:13 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
Just Perfect. The key design feature in any gun should be simplicity - so that they go bang everytime. It's bad enough that most guns come with built in key locks (unnecessary mechanical complexity) but this is taking it to a whole new level. I'll be curious to see the recognition failure rate once this is in production. I'm sure Ruger will be the first firm to adopt it, followed by Colt.
9 posted on 09/25/2006 11:48:17 AM PDT by Radio_Silence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
"The way you hold a gun, curl your fingers, contract your hand muscles as you pull the trigger—all of those measurements are unique," says Donald Sebastian, vice president for research and development at NJIT.

Donald should test it first pesonally in Iraq.

10 posted on 09/25/2006 11:48:36 AM PDT by beltfed308 (Nanny Statists are Ameba's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

So, injured or wounded, it just might not recognize your grip. Then the really deep doo-doo starts. No thanks.


11 posted on 09/25/2006 11:48:43 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

If this technology is so great, then require every police officer in America to use it. Not going to happen? I didn't think so. If it isn't good enough for them, it isn't good enough for the rest of us either.


12 posted on 09/25/2006 11:49:45 AM PDT by nralife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
The way you hold your gun
The way you grip the stock
The memory of all that
No they can't take that away from me


13 posted on 09/25/2006 11:53:01 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx; harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Hey, nifty idea. I've read lots of science fiction, too.

Tell you what -- deploy these for use with the Secret Service, FBI, DEA, ATF, the bodyguards of all federal and state politicians, as well as lots of large municipal police forces and sheriffs departments. After five years, if the concept proves valid, then perhaps they could be considered for private, although not mandatory, sale.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

14 posted on 09/25/2006 11:53:22 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nralife

"equire every police officer in America to use it"

Exactly. A dumb idea that needs to be put down quick.


15 posted on 09/25/2006 11:53:44 AM PDT by Leg Olam ("There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell them." Louis Armstrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
"So, injured or wounded, it just might not recognize your grip. Then the really deep doo-doo starts. No thanks."

Excellent point!

What about firing weak handed? If they add the circuitry similar to a car's, that adjusts the seats and mirrors for multiple drivers, the thing will be too big to handle.

Bang every time I pull the trigger, anything else is stooopid!
16 posted on 09/25/2006 11:54:06 AM PDT by petro45acp (SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG! ("On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" by Dave Grossman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

The way I grip and fire a gun at the range is very different than the way I would grip and fire a gun in an emergency. Practice, practice, practice can minimize the difference, but certainly not eliminate it.

Given that a lot of people rely on the simplest gun practical in order to ensure reliablity, who is going to want to be stuck with a weapon that might not respond due to a software inadequacy?

Talk about your Blue Screen of Deaths!


17 posted on 09/25/2006 11:54:29 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx

Nyet.


18 posted on 09/25/2006 11:54:55 AM PDT by Disambiguator (Don't mess with Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
Requiring this little gizmo on all handguns would effectively price them out of most people's reach. Which is exactly where the limousine elite gun grabbers want them.

It would also make a lucrative business opportunity for a shade tree engineer.

19 posted on 09/25/2006 11:56:46 AM PDT by magslinger (If at first you don't succeed, squeeze, squeeze again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Zzyzx
Smart gun technology was initially advanced as a means to protect LEO's from getting shot with their own guns in the event of a take away during a struggle. The interesting thing is that in every piece of legislation crafted that required the development of this technology, the police are exempt from having to adopt these weapons as their official sidearms.
I won't hold my breath waiting for the NJ State Police to field test these babies.
20 posted on 09/25/2006 11:59:27 AM PDT by Malone LaVeigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson