THE ABOVE MASS MURDER OF THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT AMERICANS WAS THE INHERITANCE/LEGACY OF 8 YEARS UNDER THE CLINTOONS.
Posted on 09/27/2006 6:25:42 AM PDT by jdm
.
CLINTON refused 3 free offers from the Sudan in 1995, 1996 and 2000 to give us OSAMA bin LADEN on a silver platter. This per MONSOOR IJAZ who personally arranged these deals, as he publically stated on the FoX News Channel ...the DAY after 9/11.
The 9/11 Commission refused to have MONSOOR IJAZ testify before it publically about this under oath. Only in closed session, not under oath, around the time SANDY BERGER stole those secret 9/11 documents from National Archives, or planted some false ones.
I just learned this weekend that the 9/11 Commission made a conscious decision NOT to address what happened leading up to 9/11 during the 1990's.
No wonder HILLARY said yesterday that she wants Democrats to get back control of Congress and the White House .."to implement all the recomendations of the 9/11 Commission Report"..?
.
..and O'Reilly started coming to Clinton's defense...
...I never remember Newt saying one word about this being premeditated....
The tone as I remember was Clinton blew it...(no pun intended)
I know, I'm sure other FReepers saw this interview...(Monday night) and can validate this.
From http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709142/posts
Fool Me Once Bill Clinton – But Don’t Wag Your Finger at Me Again
Excerpt
Clinton then went on to promote Clarke’s book, not once but several times, ostensibly to “prove” to the audience that what Clarke has to say is the gospel truth.
Truth? George W. Bush looks at results! And from Clarke, there were none! In the entire eight years he served in the Clinton administration, Afghanistan was not deloused of the Taliban, Iraq was not liberated from decades of brutal tyranny, Libya never capitulated to U.S. demands to abandon its weapons of mass destruction, Pakistan was never our ally, and Iran and Syria were never afraid of being the next target in our urgent war on terrorism.
Significantly, in the earliest days of the Bush administration, Clarke wrote: “The Bush administration decided…mid-January (2001) to… vigorously pursue the existing (Clinton) policy, including all of the lethal covert action findings…to initiate a process to look at those issues which had been on the table for a couple of years and get them decided…” And, Clarke said, in the spring before 9/11 “… to increase CIA resources, for example, for covert action, five-fold, to go after al Qaeda.”
Wow, Monday night. The clinton spin story wasn't fully out by then. Yet another reason that Newt needs to exit Stage Left and quickly.
If YOU can find that kind of response, why cant the Republicans? I'm getting sick and tired of the Republicans just sitting on their hands,,,or putting their heads in the sand!!
So far, only Condi, has responded. Unbelievable, absolutely unbelievable!!!
What in the heck is the matter with the Party?? Clinton and the democrats sure would have responded when he was in office! If they can't even respond to Hillary, they deserve to lose to her.
I think the reason the pubbies are being quite is because the POTUS said yesterday that he is to busy to reply to something like pointing fingers....
He said this during the press conference with Afghanistan leader...
AND I think the pubbies think the clinton spin machine will spin the crap themselves and will do a good job of ruining their chances.
I sure would let the Wallace/Clinton speech speak for itself....
But it's absolutely ridiculous that NO ONE has replied to Hillary the way that the Freeper, A.Hun, did!!!
Why in the world is SHE getting a FREE-PASS now too?? Are the Republicans afraid to take her on too? Are they THAT helpless?
That's outrageous!
THE ABOVE MASS MURDER OF THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT AMERICANS WAS THE INHERITANCE/LEGACY OF 8 YEARS UNDER THE CLINTOONS.
""I'm certain that if my husband and his national security team had been shown a classified report entitled 'Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States,' he would have taken it more seriously than history suggests it was taken by our current president and his national security team," she said.""
So if I understand this correctly, not once in eight years did Clinton's security team do anything. Ah... I see, nuance. The report had to say Bin Laden and be classified.
And if this is the case, Bin Ladens Fatwa to kill Americans went unnoticed by Clinton's security team. For that statement alone, Hillary and her impeached., disbarred president for a husband should be put in jail.
GWB is not going to get into the fray...however, as you mentioned, COndi came out forcefully.
Kit Bond has been at the forefront of taking on the Dems, and I believe you will see Repubs refuting this stuff all over the place.
At least I hope so...talk about a target rich environment!
The evidence states otherwise. We were attacked continually throughout the eight years of x42's presidency and he didn't do anything worth noting against the threat!
I can understand your frustration, but as it was explained to me:
What would you want a Republican to say??? Don't you think Bill said just about everything there was to say????
Do I agree with the arguement??? Some of it, but not all of it....my first line of response would be unlady like...lol...so I thought well maybe this person is right...maybe some diginity would be better...
But I wonder....what would be refute to the slime one????
The second refute would be JUST PLAIN COMMON SENSE--8 years vs. LESS THAN 8 months.
A third refure would be what Condi just did--saying that there was NO comprehensive that Slick claims he had.
Since Slick has been saying that he 'TRIED' so hard, and was 'OBSESSED'--another refure (and the BEST ONE AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED) would be for other Republicans to continually and PUBLICLY ask Slick (and even Hillary now since she has entered the fray) to again explain why he turned down Bin Laden THREE times from Sudan!!
I agree with you...there is alot to refute, and if it were me, I would be on every tv station and radio talk show refuting the slime master and hag, but it isn't me, so all we can do is post the facts and hope it gets out....
Right???
Thank God for FreeRepublic and the internet! I guess the only other thing we could do is call our Congressmen and Senators and tell them that their 'silence' is just deafening!!
Then ask them WHY they are giving the democrats and especially Hillary (since she's not only a senator, but a likely Pres candidate) a FREE PASS--since the democrats always respond immediately (James Carville comes to mind with the 'immediate' so-called 'truth squads) to anything that could possibly damage them politically.
Well if you think this was staged, I sure hope he stages a lot more of these. They are sure great for our side.
I think he truly believes it helps him. And with most of the people that give him or his wife money, it probably does. Everything, and I mean everything he does, is to benefit him politically. Nothing more, nothing less. When he gets old that may change, but I highly doubt it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.