Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. scientists win Nobel for "gene silencing"
Reuters UK ^ | Mon Oct 2, 2006 | Sarah Edmonds and Patrick Lannin

Posted on 10/02/2006 10:37:15 AM PDT by A. Pole

STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Americans Andrew Fire and Craig Mello won the 2006 Nobel prize for medicine on Monday for their discovery of how to switch off genes, a potential road to new treatments for diseases from AIDS to blindness and cancer.

[...]

Through experiments with worms, the two showed that a double strand of ribonucleic acid, or RNA, the genetic messenger of the cell, can "silence" targeted genes in a process known as RNA interference (RNAi).

[...]

(Excerpt) Read more at today.reuters.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dna; evolution; genes; rna; science

1 posted on 10/02/2006 10:37:16 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

Gee, I thought those great Muslim Universities would have won....

Oh, wait...

They only slice heads.


2 posted on 10/02/2006 10:38:22 AM PDT by OpusatFR ( ALEA IACTA EST. We have just crossed the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninenot; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; FITZ; arete; ...
This is another step toward expanding our understanding of evolution mechanisms. As I said many times, if the scientific progress continues we will be freed from the crude and false dogma that random mutations combined with blind selections can account for the complexity of life.

Add this recent discovery to the others like interspecies sharing of genes/reverse transcription and the inheritance of acquired traits will become more evident. Some day Lamarck might be rehabilitated.

"We then went back and intentionally missed the germ line and showed that we could get interference that would, in fact, spread throughout the animal. This was remarkably potent interference using very small amounts of RNA. We could dilute the RNA tremendously and still have an effect.

The other thing that was really remarkable was that you could have the interference effect skip a generation and affect the next generation."

(RNA Interviews)

3 posted on 10/02/2006 10:46:14 AM PDT by A. Pole ("Truth at first is ridiculed, then it is violently opposed and then it is accepted as self evident.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

No one silences me! And I'm sick of being blamed for everything too. "Gene causes cancer".


4 posted on 10/02/2006 10:58:00 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

So, does this mean that the "gay gene" could be switched off?


5 posted on 10/02/2006 12:17:15 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Or could it be switched ON?


6 posted on 10/02/2006 3:24:40 PM PDT by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955

By watching "The View" once too often, perhaps?


7 posted on 10/02/2006 3:56:48 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson