Skip to comments.
Pelosi Statement on Speaker’s Comments Regarding Foley Matter
House Democratic Leader ^
Posted on 10/02/2006 12:48:57 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
shessh.........
To: Sub-Driver
Democrats should be under oath also, nancy-girl.
2
posted on
10/02/2006 12:49:45 PM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: Sub-Driver
Hypocrite, thy name is Pelosi.
3
posted on
10/02/2006 12:49:50 PM PDT
by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: Sub-Driver
4
posted on
10/02/2006 12:50:01 PM PDT
by
hawkaw
To: Sub-Driver
This needs a "barf" alert!
5
posted on
10/02/2006 12:50:51 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
( The kinder we are to terrorists, the harsher we are to their potential victims.)
To: Sub-Driver
When it comes to Pelosi and the Dummiecrats....the crap always floats to the top.
To: Sub-Driver
Doubt it was the Republican leaders who knew of this for six months, Nanny. YOUR team knew about it for a long time and kept their mouths shut. So much for caring for the children.
7
posted on
10/02/2006 12:51:39 PM PDT
by
madison10
To: Sub-Driver
Hastert deserve this- he should have gone after Pelosi and the Democrats about William Jefferson. Instead, they played nice and made Bush back off.......
To: Sub-Driver
Did she even read Hastert's statement or, if that's too hard, didn't someone read it to her?
9
posted on
10/02/2006 12:51:56 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
To: Sub-Driver
if the kid's over the age of consent (and I think he was) then this is NOT pedophelia - merely homsexual recruitment. if Pelosi has a problem with homosexual recruitment, let her come out and say so.
10
posted on
10/02/2006 12:52:56 PM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: Bigh4u2
"Hypocrite, thy name is Pelosi."
I do hope the GOP is working to expose the democrats, they know who they are.
Its time to fight fire with fire.
Pelosi is a nut case. We have to do anything we can to be sure she is never in line for Commander in Chief.
To: camle
Is Foley even being accused of *doing stuff* with the kid, or is all of this over a bunch of emails?
To: Sub-Driver
shesh is right, Pelosi methinks you do protest TOO much, it seems you guys will be burned terribly when it comes to putting this fire out.
I believe the dhimmis knew far longer than the Republican leadership and in much greater detail about this.
13
posted on
10/02/2006 12:57:47 PM PDT
by
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
To: Gordongekko909
AFAIK it is all about the e-mails. someone will correct me if i'm wrong.
but it is homosexuality, NOT pedophelia which is at work here. if the kid is over the age of consent, then he is not, technically, a "child" as pelosi seems to indicate.
many 16yo's resent being called a "child".
14
posted on
10/02/2006 12:57:59 PM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
To: aft_lizard
Now she wants the GOP leadership under oath. What did they know, & when did they know it?
Nancy, be careful what you wish for.
15
posted on
10/02/2006 1:01:31 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
( The kinder we are to terrorists, the harsher we are to their potential victims.)
To: Sub-Driver
Wasn't Gary Condit a friend of Pelosi's?
16
posted on
10/02/2006 1:02:32 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
To: Gordongekko909
Is Foley even being accused of *doing stuff* with the kid, or is all of this over a bunch of emails?I don't think there was physical "stuff." At least not with those two particular young men. So what we have is a case where some internet communications were used to out a guy. We all know how accurate internet/fax/copy machine communications are.
(PS I'm not saying it didn't happen, but I want the internet stuff authenicated, if possible. The story isn't gelling right)
To: camle
Hmm... well, I'm pretty sure that the page was a high schooler. And it appears that the age of consent in DC is 16, and the page was probably at least that old. I can't imagine 15-year-old pages running around Capitol Hill.
To: Sub-Driver
Republican Leaders must be investigated by the Ethics Committee and immediately questioned under oath.Fine by me. Just as long as the 'Rats are right there along with them.
And to Heck with both parties.
19
posted on
10/02/2006 1:06:44 PM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Sub-Driver
It's not even the e-mails; it's IMs with an extremely nebulous chain of custody. (Perhaps marinated for a few years in the fishtank in Leader Pelosi's office.) BTW, the dialogue is nothing that hasn't been seen or heard on "South Park" at 9:30PM.
AFAIK There is no DNA. There is no blue dress.
(As opposed to the Democrats in similar circumstances, where there was DNA exchanged between the parties.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson