Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Statement on Speaker’s Comments Regarding Foley Matter
House Democratic Leader ^

Posted on 10/02/2006 12:48:57 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: stratman1969

Savage is gonna have a blast with this today.


41 posted on 10/02/2006 1:29:33 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

I don't know.


42 posted on 10/02/2006 1:30:25 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

"Hey Botox B*tch, which of you DemonKats was hiding this information on Foley for release just now for your party's maximum political benefit ???"


43 posted on 10/02/2006 1:31:36 PM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
...Mr. Foley’s abhorrent behavior for six months to a year and failed to protect the children in their trust

Nancy Pelosi, are you now going to go back to your San Francisco district and champion the cause of gay adults grooming teenagers for affairs?

-PJ

44 posted on 10/02/2006 1:33:20 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Heh... no, it's password-protected. There isn't any evidence of actual criminal activity in there; it's mostly petty blackmail stuff.


45 posted on 10/02/2006 1:34:00 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (Mark 5:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Anyone know how to forward this to Hannity?


46 posted on 10/02/2006 1:35:13 PM PDT by OldFriend (Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? President Karzai 9/26/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Let me guess.

Pelosi is saying this is protected freedom of speech so what's all the fuss about.


47 posted on 10/02/2006 1:35:46 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Nancy Pelosi, how could democrats sit on instant messages for THREE YEARS in order to gain tactical advantage?

Democrats had proof about a predator and DID NOTHING.


48 posted on 10/02/2006 1:37:43 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

She is LYING. I watched the Hastert announcement, live. He said they knew about the emails, which were creepy if one read into them. He said they knew NOTHING about the IMs, whcih were sexually explicit, until Friday. IMO, like I've said the past few days, I think the Dems knew about this before Friday. It appears the emails were to a different boy than the disusting IMs. I am glad Hastert is saying what he's saying. SOMEONE knew about these IMs, and kept them a secret for political reasons. I trust Hastert, and its not just because he has a (R) after his name.


49 posted on 10/02/2006 1:39:56 PM PDT by PghBaldy (What did Sandy Burglar steal from the archives? Why has he been treated with kid gloves?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Pelosi has no moral authority to make any accusations, being a leader of the party that seeks to corrupt children's minds -- and lives. Abortion, homosexual promotion and adoption, sex-ed, anti-faith, and on and on. Whatever the Republican's failure in this matter -- and may all the guilty receive their just punishment -- the Democrats have absolutely no room to talk. They are the same people who pushed to have a repeat child molester, Limon, get a lesser sentence for victimizing an institutionalized 14-year-old cuz they think homsexuality is so normal and cool. That victim was 2 years younger than this victim. Both incidents are terrible. But the left has no room to talk.


50 posted on 10/02/2006 1:40:56 PM PDT by King Black Robe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909
This is true...

CNN had Paul Begala on a few minutes ago. He said: "Anyone who sends an email to my kid, they are going to deal with the law firm of "Smith and Wesson", OK? It ain't gonna go to no Page Board, it's gonna go to my 12 gage".

So Paul Begala advocates taking the law into his own hands? He would have blown Foley away?

sw

51 posted on 10/02/2006 1:45:55 PM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I will not be surprised if very soon we hear the old song and dance about Rep hypocrisy. The funny thing is, it isn't true. Reps have standards, and the guy resigned, is being investigated by all levels of govt. I am SO GLAD Hastert is fighting back against the SMEARS against his good name.
52 posted on 10/02/2006 1:46:24 PM PDT by PghBaldy (What did Sandy Burglar steal from the archives? Why has he been treated with kid gloves?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spectre

The Forehead would only do such a thing if the person sending the email to his kid were to the right of, say, John McCain. I think he'd be a bit more "understanding" and "open-minded" if his kid came out of the closet to him and started playing cyber-footsie with some leftie pillow-biter.


53 posted on 10/02/2006 1:48:49 PM PDT by Gordongekko909 (Mark 5:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Republican Democrat Leaders admitted to knowing about Mr. Foley’s Studd's abhorrent behavior for six months to a year twenty years and failed to protect the children in their trust. Republican Democrat Leaders must be investigated by the Ethics Committee and immediately questioned under oath.”

....there - fixed her obvious spelling mistakes.

54 posted on 10/02/2006 1:51:32 PM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fabriclady
"Hypocrite, thy name is Pelosi."

She thinks that it's OK for somebody to bring a 15 year old girl across a state for an abortion without their parents permission yet, she has a problem with an old queen trolling for action and says the Repubs dont care about the children?

I do hope the GOP is working to expose the democrats, they know who they are. Its time to fight fire with fire.

We can only hope but, unfortunately, they believe in taking the high road.

55 posted on 10/02/2006 2:04:20 PM PDT by capydick (Not to know is bad; not to wish to know is worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Pelosi is a hypocrite who's every word and action is politically motivated.

She is one of the most hypocritical Catholics on the planet.

Why am I not surprised at anything she says...
56 posted on 10/02/2006 2:05:19 PM PDT by detch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
Nancy Pelosi, campaign expenditures (2005-06): http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/expendetail.asp?CID=N00007360&cycle=2006&name=ACLU+Foundation NANCY PELOSI (D-CA) Expenditures 2005-2006 Cycle Sort by Name Sort by Amount Sort by Date Sort by Description Top Overall Expenditures Recipient Amount Date Description ACLU Foundation, Oakland, CA $300 1/12/2005 Donation ____________________________Wonder if Bill O'Reilly would notice the hypocrisy of this woman?
57 posted on 10/02/2006 2:06:20 PM PDT by PghBaldy (What did Sandy Burglar steal from the archives? Why has he been treated with kid gloves?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
Democrats should be under oath also, nancy-girl.

Most democrats wouldn't think twice about lying under oath.

58 posted on 10/02/2006 2:08:38 PM PDT by MSM Hater (Shame on Senators DeRino and VRinovich!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

I think he's the one who lied and said pages were warned about Foley. THEN< when other pages disputed this, he backtracked & apologized. I think the Dems got a lot of inexperienced people to help with their dirty work (smearing the House leadership), and some may have gotten in over their heads.


59 posted on 10/02/2006 2:22:52 PM PDT by PghBaldy (What did Sandy Burglar steal from the archives? Why has he been treated with kid gloves?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Click on the link now. Funny error, which I have never seen before...


60 posted on 10/02/2006 2:26:03 PM PDT by PghBaldy (What did Sandy Burglar steal from the archives? Why has he been treated with kid gloves?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson