Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Crooked Mexican elites showboating again.
1 posted on 10/05/2006 2:22:15 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster

In that case, the U.S. should refer the continuous Mexican invasion to the United Nations Insecurity Council as it constitutes a violation of American sovereignty.

Oh wait, that would require John Bolton to be elected President first.

I can wait 2 years. Meantime, build the damn fence!


2 posted on 10/05/2006 2:25:06 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

This figures.


3 posted on 10/05/2006 2:25:21 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Hmmmm....

Iran develops nuclear weapons to threaten the world.

North Korea develops and threatens to test nuclear weapons to threaten the world.

The United States builds a fence.

Any bets on which issue will get a unanimous vote on the UN Security Council?


4 posted on 10/05/2006 2:28:01 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Stop the "tyranny of the 'offended' " -- say what you mean and stand by it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
He said the fences would hurt the bilateral relations. "Just the idea of a wall, a fence ... is an insult to good neighbors."

Based upon this reaction it must be a good idea!

5 posted on 10/05/2006 2:28:46 AM PDT by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

OH NO! NOT A REFERRAL TO THE UN! WE'RE DOOMED!

Jeez, there it is! The "letter of severe dissappointment" from Kofi. You read it...I'm not strong enough.


6 posted on 10/05/2006 2:33:34 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
"He said the fences would hurt the bilateral relations. "Just the idea of a wall, a fence ... is an insult to good neighbors.""

He meant to say, "Ay caramba! We won't be able to dump our poor off on another country!"


7 posted on 10/05/2006 2:34:15 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
He said the fences would hurt the bilateral relations. "Just the idea of a wall, a fence ... is an insult to good neighbors."

No one in Mexico should be insulted.

8 posted on 10/05/2006 2:34:17 AM PDT by Razz Barry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

OOOOOOOOoooh! The United Nations! We're quaking in our boots!

We don't need no steeenking UN approval!


9 posted on 10/05/2006 2:35:42 AM PDT by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"The outgoing Mexican President Vicente Fox called the fence plan "shameful," while President-elect Felipe Calderon said the fences were not the solution to illegal immigration."

Hey Vicente:


10 posted on 10/05/2006 2:37:48 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Well....we could solve the whole problem and de-fund the UN of US Taxpayer dollars and kick the UN to Mexico....


11 posted on 10/05/2006 2:38:36 AM PDT by GLH3IL (Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

"..new fencing along the U.S.- Mexico border was an "offense," Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Ernesto Derbez"

The offenders just love to cry, 'offense' ..btw Derbez, a fence is DEFENSIVE FROM OFFENSE!


13 posted on 10/05/2006 2:45:21 AM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I almost wish Obrador had been elected. At least he would have been more openly, overtly anti-American than these mealy-mouthed crooks talking about "good neighbors" .
15 posted on 10/05/2006 2:47:42 AM PDT by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
President-elect Felipe Calderon said the fences were not the solution to illegal immigration.

And he has no solution to offer...

18 posted on 10/05/2006 3:12:39 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Mexico doubts border fence will happen
  Posted by Red Steel
On News/Activism 10/05/2006 12:58:20 AM CDT · 20 replies · 308+ views


cnn International ^ | October 4, 2006
MEXICO CITY, Mexico (AP) -- A spokesman for Mexican President Vincente Fox on Wednesday said the United States will likely never build 700 miles of new fencing along the border dividing the two nations. The fence received final approval in the United States last week. But Fox's spokesman Ruben Aguilar said the U.S. Congress is unlikely to approve enough funding to finish the project. "There is no money to build it, so it won't be built," Aguilar told reporters. "Even though the wall was approved, there is no funding." No one knows how much the 700-mile (1,125-kilometer) fence will cost,...
Cornyn: 700 miles of border fence won't happen Senator says doesn't have funds.
  Posted by axes_of_weezles
On News/Activism 10/04/2006 10:19:08 PM CDT · 72 replies · 822+ views


The Austin American Statesman ^ | 4 October 2006 | eunice moscoso
Cornyn: 700 miles of border fence won't happen Senator says plan isn't practical, doesn't have the necessary funds. By Eunice Moscoso WASHINGTON BUREAU Wednesday, October 04, 2006 WASHINGTON — Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican and key liaison to the White House on immigration, said Tuesday that 700 miles of fencing approved by Congress for the United States' southern border will probably not be built because of a lack of money and other practical considerations. "It's one thing to authorize. It's another thing to actually appropriate the money and do it," he said.Cornyn predicted that some fencing would be built...
U.S. fence ends immigration dream of Mexico's Fox
  Posted by VU4G10
On News/Activism 09/30/2006 10:56:37 PM CDT · 81 replies · 1,456+ views


washingtonpost ^ | September 30, 2006 | Alistair Bell
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexican President Vicente Fox retires in November with his dream shattered of a U.S. immigration overhaul that would allow millions more Mexicans to work legally north of the border. Fox was once warmly described by President Bush as an "amigo," and his main foreign-policy objective was persuading U.S. lawmakers to soften immigration laws.

19 posted on 10/05/2006 3:13:08 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"Just the idea of a wall, a fence ... is an insult to good neighbors."

Good fences make good neighbors.

Anyway, it's a good thing we've got John Bolton at the UN. He can tell them to stuff it where the sun doesn't shine.

21 posted on 10/05/2006 3:19:07 AM PDT by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

can't stress enough how much dead rotting bodies indicate that crossing would not be a good idea, a bullet cost very little


22 posted on 10/05/2006 3:25:00 AM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I keep hearing "Mexican government says this... Mexican government say that..."

Whoever the hell is in the "Mexican government" ain't no friend of the American people.


29 posted on 10/05/2006 3:30:08 AM PDT by djf (There is no such thing as "moderate muslims". They are all "silent supporters!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
There will be legal ports of entry along the fence for the the good Mexicans to cross thru and allow Americans to cross over to get their prescriptions filled.
30 posted on 10/05/2006 3:32:13 AM PDT by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Since when does the UN have any say regarding matters like this?

Defund them, and send those crooks to N. Korea.


33 posted on 10/05/2006 3:40:23 AM PDT by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Mexico must have neglected to read Article 2, paragraph 4 of the UN Charter:

4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

34 posted on 10/05/2006 3:48:07 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson