Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Foley Investigation(Michael Barone)
U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT ^ | October 06, 2006 | Michael Barone

Posted on 10/07/2006 6:53:38 AM PDT by kellynla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: BurtSB

Doesn't that need some explanation?


21 posted on 10/07/2006 7:52:00 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This represents the next step of the investigation in my opinion

Somehow I don't believe this 'next step' will take place until after the election, in which case, it won't matter one iota politically. In addition it will get scant attention from the DBM!!

22 posted on 10/07/2006 7:52:57 AM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Selective outrage at its finest.

Just part of the plan!!!

23 posted on 10/07/2006 7:53:53 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Dems are attempting the equivalent of a nuclear IED timed to go off in time to create a regime change in the House. The drive-by media loves to report the carnage.

Under the protection of CFR, the Republican response may be crippled. If the Dems are successful in taking over the House, this is the dirtiest dirty trick in modern times.

24 posted on 10/07/2006 7:57:05 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
Thread on the second item :

Conservatives Accuse Watchdog Group[CREW] of 'Christianophobia'

25 posted on 10/07/2006 8:03:12 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I see "Foley" couldn't even spell "you're" correctly?


26 posted on 10/07/2006 8:04:27 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I had hoped Michael would have some reassuring words on how he thinks this will not hurt Republicans at the ballot box but he does not seem to do that. I wonder what his projections are now. A few weeks ago he thought they would maintain their majorities but by reduced margins.

In any case the big media/Democrat lie about the GOP covering up for pedophiles continues. The local rag paper had a cartoon by Nick Anderson, I think that's the name. Shows a Repub elephant getting hit by a brick that says "pedophilia is illegal." Duh. Foley was no pedophile, as far as we know.


27 posted on 10/07/2006 8:06:44 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Here is a link to a thread about Pelosi's page.

Pelosi Page

Is there a connection?

Should Pelosi be made to resign too?

28 posted on 10/07/2006 8:07:26 AM PDT by TruthConquers (Delenda est publius schola)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
But is it ethical to withhold information when its earlier disclosure might serve to protect young people from harassment?

That's one issue. The other issue -- the one that has to be addressed in the next couple of weeks -- is the dishonesty of withholding the key information while accusing opponents of a coverup. If we can get the public to understand this, the whole Foley thing will boomerang.

29 posted on 10/07/2006 8:11:35 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
And .. the stories of a book deal is plenty of motivation for these young people to try to get the "goods" on Foley

from August 2004 www.pagealumni entry Robin Katsaras entry indicates she still needs to complete interviews of additional congressional pages but has draft done for 4 of 15 chapters of the project that will definitely get published sometime.

Christopher Katsaras, her son, was sponsored by Nancy Pelosi. I viewed his web page on My Space, he is a third year student at Georgetown, which includes his Page term of service.

30 posted on 10/07/2006 8:12:57 AM PDT by proud2beconservativeinNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I think we're going to be surprised at the outcome of this.


31 posted on 10/07/2006 8:13:39 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (If I had a nut allergy, I'd be outta here. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
In many jurisdictions it the specifically requires anyone who has knowledge of crimes against children, or suspicion of such matters, to report it the authorities. I would think that anyone who knew of the sexually explicit IM's would fall under that law. Perhaps they knew all along the IM's had not been sent to anyone who was either currently a page or under the 18, but knew if they presented the information with the proper spin everyone would jump to the conclusion that Foley had been engaging in overtly illegal behavior. Looks to me like Foley was pretty careful to not run afoul of the letter, if not the intent, of the law. Foley certainly has no to blame but himself for the pickle he's in, and a lot of people have every right to be very angry with him for engaging in behavior that while strictly legal would reflect poorly indeed on the House.

The very nature of the problems they were trying to handle regarding Foley made it an sure lose-lose situation. I can think of no way they could have done it that wouldn't have left them open to criticism by one or more of the parties involved.
32 posted on 10/07/2006 8:15:19 AM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I am very serious about the your/you're spelling error in those documents. I wonder if anyone else has correspondence from Foley that might show if that is a typical error for him to make.


33 posted on 10/07/2006 8:18:41 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I find in really funny watching this. With 20-20 hind site the Always Angry tell us what should of been done.

Sorry but rumor and innuendo is not actionable. The Leaderhsip did look into the emails. The emails in themselves are not actionable. LIKE it or not there IS a certain amount of risk in life. You cannot go arrest someone because you are uncomfortable with something they did. You actually have to have SOME proof of something. The Emails are indicative of a problem but they had no proof to work from.

People need to keep in the fore front of their minds the difference between IMS and emails. NO one knew beyond ABC News, Foley and the 18 year old knew about the IMS until 2 weeks ago

This Foley crap is nothing but meaningless nonsense and noise. He resigned. He is under investigation. He will be prosecuted. Meanwhile the REAL important stuff is not being talked about so the Junk Media drama queens can hyperventilate about a complete NON issue and divert attention off the Democrats complete lack of anything that even looks like a sane idea of a plan for our future.

You tax bill, the War on Terrorism, the Border, your kids future, NSA bill pending in front of Congress, Judges, Spending, Jobs and the Economy, ALL the real issues that the next Congress will have to deal with will STILL be here and need a resolution a month from now when NO one even remembers Foley's name. Voters are going to be thinking about that not the crap in the Junk News media.

IF the Democrat Noise machine was the all powerful Vote outcome determinate people fear, John Kerry would of won in 2004. Conservative who spend too much time near the Junk Media machine get sucked into the game. This is important to the media, no one else.
34 posted on 10/07/2006 8:21:07 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All
The CREW Emails - Many Discrepencies!
Important Updates Below
Remember, If these are doctored e-mails then this is a big deal.

*****************************************AN EXCERPT *********************************

CREW has posted the emails it sent to the FBI (which are redacted like the FBI claims) and there are interesting tidbits for the timeline. These email refer to the 2005 contacts with the Page from Louisianna whose family has asked ther media to stay away.

First off, the emails between the Page and the House Staffer were sent on August 31, 2005! Yes folks, last year. Supposedly this is from the Page to an unknown Staffer (democrat?) who was the intermediary for passing the emails to the news media. So we know the Congressional staffer held these for a year and never told the FBI or House leadership.

Second, the Fax was made on May 29, 2006. This would imply the Fax to CREW was almost a year later than the tip to the staffer. But CREW also held onto these for 2 months until they provided them to the FBI on July 21. Obviously they did not rush these to the FBI like they claimed.

35 posted on 10/07/2006 8:21:17 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I've heard about the August 31,'05 date before and it doesn't make sense to me. Wasn't that only a day after Katrina hit? I don't remember but it just seems too close to the event for Foley to be emailing the kid. I was under the impression the emails were later.


36 posted on 10/07/2006 8:28:49 AM PDT by NEPA (You say redneck like its a bad thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BurtSB

"Contact Joe Negron office in Stuart FL

Manager - Sherry 772-349-7878
Martin Co Repub party office - 772-286-0615

Negron website will be up by monday !"

When his website is up, please start a thread with the the specifics re donating. Please ping me and others who are outraged with this latest attempt to electronically coup an election by the homosexual driven rat party.

Besides donating to Irey, I will donate to his election fund.

If I was rich like $oreA$$, I would be offering $100,000 rewards for anyone coming forth with information that documented and identified homosexual predators on the staff of Pelosi, Frank, Boxer, Finestein and other rats in congress. Then, I would do the same for Rat Governors and key state legislators. Next I would do the same for CREW and the other fake non Profits financed by George $oreA$$. The final offer would include the elites who control the MSM, write for the MSM and appear on tv lying about our guys and gals.

The rats will be sorry that they ever started this bs.


37 posted on 10/07/2006 8:29:39 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

If Rove is the evil genius everyone seems to think he is, he better have a plan of action ready before the election.


38 posted on 10/07/2006 8:31:18 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NEPA
Lots of questions still.....

****************************

From the link at post #35:

***************************************

Update: I should also note another problem. The only Foley email to the Page with a date visible is the first contact on July 29, 2005 - before Katrina obviously. And about Katrina. Katrina hit land on August 29th. These emails with the Page and the Staffer are on August 30th and 31st? The district this Page is from is the 5th District of LA, which is the upper east half of the LA “boot” top. But my recollection was massive power problems at this time. So was the Page in Louisianna? Why are the dates all blacked out the on the Foley emails? Do they not jive with the first email’s date of 8/31/05?

39 posted on 10/07/2006 8:33:28 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
My recollection from when this all broke is that Foley's first contact with the LA boy was to see how the kid came through Katrina. My memory could be faulty.

Do we have a reliable time line for the emails or have they been altered to the point of making it too difficult to pin down?

Also, for the IMs, am I correct in my understanding that the contact we are certain of is that of Jordan Edmund and he was 18 at the time? The other allegations are unsubstantiated and may or may not involve minors.

40 posted on 10/07/2006 8:43:00 AM PDT by NEPA (You say redneck like its a bad thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson