Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Schwarzenegger should free aging inmate (87 y.o.)
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 10/18/06 | AP

Posted on 10/18/2006 9:48:53 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger lacks legal grounds to deny parole to a feeble inmate who has been behind bars since 1989 for killing the wife of a Los Angeles County man who bought his restaurant and then refused to pay, an appeals court ruled Tuesday.

Schwarzenegger overruled a recommendation from the California Board of Parole Hearings last year when he refused to approve the release of Wen Lee, 87. Calling Lee's crime "atrocious," the governor said at the time that Lee did not accept responsibility for the second-degree murder of Tuai Li-Chin and the attempted murder of her husband, Johnny Soong.

But the Los Angeles-based 2nd District Court of Appeal said that Lee should be freed from prison because the state had not shown he still was a danger to society. The court noted that Lee has diabetes and high blood pressure among other infirmities and would probably be deported to his native China if he were paroled.

"We find no evidence that Lee is likely to commit another crime or that his release would unreasonably endanger the public," said Justice Laurence Rubin in the 3-0 decision.

Nathan Barankin, a spokesman for California's attorney general, said state's lawyers would consult the governor's office before deciding whether to appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court. The high court has said previously that a governor can veto a recommendation from the parole board to free an inmate with a sentence if there is a sound reason for doing so.

Lee pleaded guilty to the murder and attempted murder charges in 1989 and was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole. According to court papers, he shot Tuai Li-Chin accidentally during a meeting with her and her husband, who had bought Lee's restaurant and then refused to pay the money Lee intended to use to fund his retirement.

Lee went to the meeting planning to kill Soong and kill himself. Soong was hit by two bullets and one struck his wife.

Lee's lawyer, Roger Hanson, said the ruling could set a helpful precedent for other cases involving elderly or sick inmates.

"It shows that certain prisoners who have done a lot of time and are infirm and pose no risk to society should be paroled," he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: aging; court; inmate; schwarzenegger; stealthjudges; wenlee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 10/18/2006 9:48:56 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Let him rot


2 posted on 10/18/2006 9:52:10 AM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"But the Los Angeles-based 2nd District Court of Appeal said that Lee should be freed from prison because the state had not shown he still was a danger to society."

He's in prison because he killed someone, not because he's a danger to society. Leave him in there.


3 posted on 10/18/2006 9:53:47 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Around here this is not a question anymore. Virginia simply abolished parole.

You do the crime; you do the time.

4 posted on 10/18/2006 9:56:14 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is why we need the death penalty, so that these creeps won't be released when the leftists get back into power.


5 posted on 10/18/2006 9:58:08 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (Extreme Leftism: fascism, communism, nazism. Take your pick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Somebody's not understanding the meaning of "life in prison."


6 posted on 10/18/2006 10:02:05 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

well, if he's truly sorry and his victim comes back to life, then we can set him free.

until then, throw away the key.


7 posted on 10/18/2006 10:06:45 AM PDT by Zeppelin (You've been Zarqed !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"We find no evidence that Lee is likely to commit another crime or that his release would unreasonably endanger the public,"

This is irrelevant. He is a convicted murderer. He should serve his sentence until it's end.

8 posted on 10/18/2006 10:08:08 AM PDT by Mrs Ivan (English, and damned proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Euthanasia?


9 posted on 10/18/2006 10:10:23 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger lacks legal grounds to deny parole

Well, well. The Governor lacks legal grounds to make up his own mind on who deserves parole? Laughable.

10 posted on 10/18/2006 10:11:19 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Isn't it actually better for him to stay in prison? If he is so sick and infirm, how is he going to get medical treatment if he's on his own and destitute? The article says he would "probably" be deported to China, but does anyone really believe that? Wouldn't it be better to just keep him in prison where the state is already paying for his keep, rather than let him out and then have him take away health care from others in an already-strained medical system?

-PJ

11 posted on 10/18/2006 10:16:15 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
But the Los Angeles-based 2nd District Court of Appeal said that Lee should be freed from prison because the state had not shown he still was a danger to society.

That's not the point. He's in prison as punishment for his crime, not just because he may be a danger to society.

12 posted on 10/18/2006 10:20:29 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod (Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged

Like california jury will ever hand out the death penalty here in california. Even if they do, it' likely wont survive appeal.


13 posted on 10/18/2006 10:24:59 AM PDT by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"We find no evidence that Lee is likely to commit another crime or that his release would unreasonably endanger the public," said Justice Laurence Rubin in the 3-0 decision.

What kind of evidence would they have while he's in prison? They wouldn't know for sure until they let him loose and he tries to kill someone else.

14 posted on 10/18/2006 10:29:47 AM PDT by DejaJude (Admiral Clark said, "Our mantra today is life, liberty and the pursuit of those who threaten it!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
its a shame the wife was involved....and that is a crime

BUT

I can remember a few times being screwed in deals... I had thoughts, and if thoughts could kill, they would have.

Go back 150 years to the opening of the west....and Mr. X reneges on his deal to give Mr. Y money for the property that was taken and being used by Mr. X. In a town lets say like Deadwood, Mr Y would have had the right and the duty to fill him with lead.

Now I aint saying its right, and I already said that the innocent bystander part of the deal was a crime....But there is no honesty in business dealings any more and the handshake means nothing.

15 posted on 10/18/2006 10:36:51 AM PDT by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Heh, I must just have a different take on this than all of you. As I see it, the dead woman and her husband were thieves who fleeced a 70 year old man out of his restauraunt and retirement. This isn't a guy who planned on relying on uncle sam to take care of him for the rest of his life, he built a business, gained enough equity to retire on, and then tried to sell it. Sadly for him, his business was purchased by unscrupulous people who took his work and then refused to pay for it, leaving him penniless.

Hell, I'd have shot them myself. Let the old guy go, he's done enough time.
16 posted on 10/18/2006 10:37:55 AM PDT by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Courts that think they know better than the Governor/legislature are the real threat to society.


17 posted on 10/18/2006 10:40:03 AM PDT by vamoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion
Let the old guy go, he's done enough time.

If the victims were your parents, I suspect you might see it differently.
18 posted on 10/18/2006 10:55:41 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
If the victims were your parents, I suspect you might see it differently.

If my parents were cold hearted enough to screw a 70 year old man out of his life's business and the retirement he'd worked hard for, you'd be surprised at how little my views would change. Would I grieve for them? Sure. But I still wouldn't blame the old guy. These people were creeps who preyed on an old man, and one of them paid the ultimate price for it. I feel about as much sympathy for them as I do for car thieves and burglars who get shot by property owners.

Still, the guy committed a crime, and it was proper that he be sent to jail for it. Given the nature of the crime the victim perpetrated against HIM, however, I think we need to be lenient with this one. Let him go.
19 posted on 10/18/2006 11:09:49 AM PDT by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion

I'll tell you what's scary to me.....I think exactly like you on this matter and that is scary!


20 posted on 10/18/2006 11:18:11 AM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson