1 posted on
10/19/2006 6:33:26 PM PDT by
blam
To: blam
Think Dear Leader is even capable of listening to reason?
2 posted on
10/19/2006 6:34:47 PM PDT by
lesser_satan
(EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
To: blam
Gee,I wonder what the Chinese might be telling Kim Mentally Ill *privately*.
3 posted on
10/19/2006 6:38:13 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
To: blam
Awwwww, comon Kimmy... You're not going to let those dog eaters in China push you around, are you?
5 posted on
10/19/2006 6:40:00 PM PDT by
Brilliant
To: blam
China delivered a blunt message to North Korea yesterday when it told its leader, Kim Jong-il, that he must not proceed with a second nuclear weapons test.
FINALLY!
To: blam
10 posted on
10/19/2006 6:44:39 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: blam
I hope this is accurate. This is the only out I see at this point. Kim will never respond to what we do short of war and he definately will not be moved by that stupid debating society called the UN. But China has the power to cut Kim off at the knees.
15 posted on
10/19/2006 6:52:42 PM PDT by
CougarGA7
(If I retire at 55 and live to my father's age I will have to work for 5 years after I'm dead.)
To: blam
China did not confirm what the message said, but American officials said they believed it to be a strongly worded warning.
It'll be OK, as long as the message states they strenuously object.
20 posted on
10/19/2006 7:00:59 PM PDT by
edpc
(Violence is ALWAYS a solution. Maybe not the right one....but a solution nonetheless)
To: blam
Looks like "the worst secretary of state in American history, Condi Rice" (according to Michael Savage) is making some progress in her trip to NE asia.
21 posted on
10/19/2006 7:01:09 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: blam
Hugo Chavez will offer to help for "humanitarian" reasons.
23 posted on
10/19/2006 7:02:11 PM PDT by
denydenydeny
("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
To: blam
They should let Kim 'mentally" Ill test and then they should let us run a few test. We need to test our accuracy ...
I say if he wants nukes, we should air deliver him a few.
Better get Kim before he gets us.
That's what Ray Lewis, Genghis Khan, and George Washington (see the Hessians) would do.
Sack them before they sack us.
26 posted on
10/19/2006 7:07:09 PM PDT by
do the dhue
(If you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem.)
To: blam
I will wait and see if master Clinton says anything or if Bill Richardson will take to the airwaves and say Mr. Il don't do it.
To: blam
Some years ago I had speculated that the only way to get China's attention is the prospect of a re-armed Japan. I suspect that the recent shift in the Japanese political situation has affected diplomacy (i.e. Nothing will get China's attention quicker than a re-armed Japan--along with a revised Constitution).
To: blam
While this might be a good warning, does anyone really believe that it will have any effect on Kim? The man is obviously insane and seems to be begging for someone to wage war on his country. There is no way possible to reason with someone so irrational. It is a sad reflection on the people of North Korea that there is not a single person with enough courage to get rid of him.
32 posted on
10/19/2006 7:14:49 PM PDT by
Lorraine
To: blam
The little ahole can't hear.
35 posted on
10/19/2006 7:20:40 PM PDT by
b4its2late
(I'm not insensitive, I just don't care.)
To: blam
I have something I want to ask L'il Kim. Hey L'il Kim, remember back when North Korea invaded South Korea? And do you remember that when the South Koreans called for help they got it? My question is this:
"If China invades you, who are you going to call?"
37 posted on
10/19/2006 7:28:13 PM PDT by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: blam
This is a slam dunk for Condi and the US.
By now Condi has explained the following to Chinese authorities:
Are you having trouble controlling your rogue state North Korea?
What a coincidence! We are also having trouble controlling our rogue democracies.
It looks like Japan may also prolif.
Who knows rogue South Korea may also prolif.
It looks like Taiwan also has some interests in this area. And as you know, it is very hard to control these rogue states. END OF COMMUNICATION
Rest assured, China has gotten the message and Kim Jong Il's days are numbered. I would not rule out Chinese assasination. Cutting of the oil is probably the mildest of solutions.
39 posted on
10/19/2006 7:39:38 PM PDT by
lonestar67
(Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
To: blam
Kimmy boy better listen up.
Anybody think the Chinese would be slightly perturbed if a radioactive cloud of Plutonium heads north across the border after one of Kim's high school shop class nukes?
45 posted on
10/19/2006 8:03:45 PM PDT by
djf
(I'm not ISLAMOPHOBIC, just BOMBOPHOBIC!! Whether that's the same is up to Islam!!!)
To: blam
Interesting development! Kim can embarrass the Chinese by heeding their warning, make himself appear to be their puppet, lose a little face in order to make them lose face.
Of course if he doesn't take heed, they would lose more face and---he could lose more than face.
To: blam
Communist China is using rare logic. Peking realizes that the American market for their products must remain strong. North Korea is the bull in the China shop (no pun intended).
The news media focuses on the giant square in North Korea's capital showing a parade of thousands of goose-stepping soldiers and a few dozen rocket-launchers. I'm not impressed.
The capital of the country is it. There are no other cities that come anywhere near it in size and modern infrastructure. There are only five cities with central sewer systems in the entire country.
Who is the greatest danger to America, North Korea or terrorists? Answer: Liberals.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
