Soon, he'll be a well-behaved, (Sha'ria) law-abiding citizen.
Posted on 10/23/2006 1:55:42 PM PDT by rajuchor
Chicago Teen Sentenced to "Sensitivity Training" from CAIR Eighteen year-old David Huffman says he “tapped” a Muslim woman on the head, nearly dislodging her headscarf, as a “prank.” He was charged with battery, and pleaded guilty.
But instead of fining or sentencing him to jail, the judge ordered him to undergo “sensitivity training” from the foremost radical Islamic front group in the United States, at the notorious Bridgeview Mosque: ‘Prank’ gets teen lesson in tolerance from CAIR. (Hat tip: Jim C.)
David Huffman told police it was just a prank gone wrong: On April 22, at a McDonald’s in Tinley Park, he tapped a Muslim woman on the head, nearly pulling off her headscarf.
The woman, a young mother with her children, didn’t see it as harmless. She was scared and embarrassed; her faith had been attacked. She told police, and they called it battery.
But in a surprising twist, a Cook County circuit judge did not fine or jail Huffman, who pleaded guilty. He was instead ordered to undergo sensitivity training at the downtown Chicago office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights organization.
During the past three months, Huffman, 18, has spent 40 hours listening to and talking with Muslims across Chicagoland. He has completed required tasks that seemed ripped from reality television: watching Muslim youths play basketball, attending a 9/11 event and visiting area mosques, which Huffman called “synagogues” at the beginning of his training.
But what exactly did David Huffman learn?
When Huffman first arrived Aug. 4 at the Muslim civil rights organization’s office, his hands were shaking from nervousness, and he appeared as though he’d rather have been anywhere else. He was late, for starters. He arrived with his shoes untied and a patchy stubble, looking more like he had just stumbled out of bed than spent the better part of an hour commuting from Tinley Park.
“I’d rather not talk about it,” Huffman said of the April incident, soon after arriving. “I want to forget it.”
He eventually told his version of the events. He said he knew he was wrong, but he was confused why the woman had become so upset.
“I understood immediately after I did it. But even after I apologized, she was still so angry,” he said. “I didn’t understand that.”
Explaining that to him would be the responsibility of Veronica Zapata, the organization’s sensitivity training coordinator.
The judge has essentially ordered the kid to undergo religious indoctrination, and the media are fine with it.
Imagine the reaction if he had, say, vandalized a Jesus bumpersticker and the judge had ordered him to 40 hours of Baptist Sunday school.
The judge should be removed, and jailed, for an egregious violation of the First Amendment.
Hey kid, think of all the other burkhas you can tap!
I would've taken the jail time and retained my dignity.
She's a member of the Religion of Perpetual Rage.
He should convert then marry several moslem women who he can then treat like dogs.
Exactly right!
Don't touch a head with an Afro, or you'll need to spend 40 hours with the Black Panthers...
Soon, he'll be a well-behaved, (Sha'ria) law-abiding citizen.
Oh, I'm not so sure I've got a problem with this. Some punk smacks a woman in the head and then claims "It was a joke" when the cops pick him up? How many times have I heard "It was just a joke" when some kid in my Troop smacks someone or damages their property? I don't blame her for being scared. Let the kid suffer consequences for being stupid.
"Chicago Teen Sentenced to "Sensitivity Training" from CAIR" In other words, conversion proceedings.
Now you how bad the US justice system stinks.
Touching someone without permission is battery. I'm not so sure I agree with the sentence though.
|
Probably told him they would kill him and his family if he spoke disparagingly about the religion of hate.
I woder if he packed a bag lunch of ham sandwiches and pork rinds when he attended those events?
Actually, that's not an example of Sharia. This is the commemoration of when the forces of the differing branches of Islam (Shiite and Sunni) met in battle back in the 8th century. The Shiites believe that Muhammed's son-in-law was his lawful successor, and the Sunnis believe that one of Muhammed's father-in-laws was the rightful successor. These are Shiite Moslems mourning the fact that on this day they lost the battle for supremacy in Islam, and bloodying themselves in commemoration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.