Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Live Thread Friday Oct 27, 2006
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | 10-27-2006 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 10/27/2006 8:56:11 AM PDT by MNJohnnie

http://beccycole.com/albums/videos/poster_girl.shtml

Great Video. The Aussies get it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1726911/posts

Another Vietnam Asharq Al-Awsat ^ | 10/27/06 | Amir Taheri

Posted on 10/27/2006 8:21:42 AM CDT by Valin

Even before the US-led coalition had fired its first shot in the war that saved Iraq from Saddam Hussein there were some who predicted that the exercise would become “another Vietnam.”

The “another Vietnam” chorus included radical American intellectuals such as Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky and Sean Penn along with such figures on both the extreme right and the extreme left in Europe as Jean-Marie Le Pen, George Galloway and Harold Pinter. Since then, the prediction that Iraq was becoming or had already become “another Vietnam” has hit the headlines every three or four months.

The “another Vietnam” chorus is at its loudest whenever there is an upsurge in terrorist insurgency or sectarian violence in Iraq and at times when the US is holding an election.

It is, therefore, not surprising that October should have witnessed the return of the “another Vietnam” chorus at its loudest.

October has witnessed the worst violence in Iraq in 18 months. The joint efforts of the US forces and the new Iraqi army to end sectarian killings and terrorist attacks in Baghdad have failed. There has also been a series of defeatist declarations by a number of US and British politicians and military figures. Add to all that the fact that the US is headed for a crucial mid-term election early next month, and October becomes the ideal month for an upsurge in “another Vietnam” predictions.

The problem, however, is that because we are never told what the phrase “another Vietnam” actually means, the analogy may be misleading.

To start with the US and its allies in Vietnam were defending an un-elected and corrupt regime in Saigon against its enemies in both the south and North Vietnam. In Iraq, however, the US-led coalition is on the side of an elected government that represents virtually the entire Iraqi nation. There is no equivalent of the Hanoi regime in Iraq to offer the Iraqis an alternative vision and a flag under which to fight the government in Baghdad. The Al Qaeda figures in Iraq and the remnants of the Saddamite clan could hardly be compared to Hochi Minh and his associates who had won their credentials during decades of struggle against French colonialism.

In Vietnam, the US and its Western allies had some 600,000 troops committed to the war. In Iraq that number is around 150,000.

The US task force in Vietnam was a conscript army while the one in Iraq is an entirely voluntary one. In Vietnam the US lost an average of 25 men each day. In Iraq the figure is two a day.

In Vietnam, apart from the north that was under Communist rule, the Vietcong controlled large chunks of territory both in the Mekong delta and close to the Laotian and Cambodian borders. In Iraq, however, Al Qaeda and the Saddamites control no territory.

As far as treasure is concerned, the Vietnam War was nine times costlier for the US in comparable dollars than the Iraq operation has been.

In Vietnam, Hanoi and the Vietcong received support from the Soviet Union and China. In Iraq, support for opponents of the democratic system comes from Iran and Syria.

Also unlike the era of Vietnam, there is no grass-root movement in the US in sympathy with either Al Qaeda or the Saddamites; Not even the most determined anti-Bush figures in the US are prepared to openly side with Saddam Hussein and Abu-Ayyub al-Masri.

There is one other major reason why Iraq will not be “another Vietnam.” That reason is George W Bush, possibly the most stubborn US leader since President Harry S Truman. Bush is not a cut-and-run type, especially at a time that he enters the second half of his final term in office and must be thinking of his place in history.

Having said all that Iraq may yet become “another Vietnam” in only one sense. The Americans may still decide to snatch defeat from the jaws of military victory just as they did in Vietnam. There are many in the US political and cultural elite who want Iraq to fail with an almost pathological ardour solely to get at George W Bush and his supposed cabal of “neoncons”. A Democrat controlled Congress could cut the budget for the US troops in Iraq, forcing their withdrawal.

But even if there is a new Congress controlled by the Democrats it is not at all certain that it would cut the troops’ budget and send that last helicopter to get the last Americans out of Baghdad. Apart from a lunatic fringe, no one in the Democrat Party is advocating a cut-and-run policy in Iraq.

This is because they know that Iraqis not another Vietnam. In Iraq, the US and its allies have achieved all their political objectives that included the dismantling of Saddam Hussein’s machinery of war and repression and the restoration of power to the Iraqi people. In Vietnam, however, the US failed to dismantle the Communist-Vietcong machinery of war and repression, and certainly did not restore power to the people even in the southern half of the country

A precipitous US withdrawal from Iraq is certain to complicate matters for the newly created democratic system.

But it would not mean a seizure of power by Al Qaeda and the Saddamites. The terrorists and the insurgents could continue killing people and causing mayhem for many more years just as their counterparts did in Algeria, Egypt and Turkey among others. But one thing is certain: Al Qaeda and Saddamites will never rule in Baghdad.

If the Iraqis wish to end the coalition’s military presence they have an opportunity to do so at the end of this year when the UN mandate under which the US-led forces are in Iraq comes to an end. But if the Iraqi parliament decides to extend the US-led coalition’s mandate, that decision should be respected and supported.

When it invaded Iraq, the US-led coalition entered into a moral contract with the Iraqi people. Under that contract the coalition to destroy the Saddamite tyranny and transfer power to the people of Iraq. In exchange, the Iraqi people were required to create a pluralist system based on power sharing among all the communities. The Iraqis have laid the foundations of precisely such a system. The US-led coalition must help defend this new system against its enemies until new Iraq is in a position to protect itself.

The best judgment at present is that new Iraq will need the coalition’s support for another 18 months or so. What is important is that, despite the violence and numerous social and economic problems, the new pluralist system in Iraq is deepening its roots, while a new political culture is taking shape. In other words there is something worth preserving, something worth fighting for. While new tactics may be needed to adapt to new conditions on the ground, especially in dealing with a highly protean insurgency, the strategy in Iraq remains as valid as it was four years ago. This is a strategy of creating an Iraq that belongs to all Iraqis and will never again be dominated by a single clan, let alone a brutal despot


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elrushbo; majoritykeeper; rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 661-662 next last
To: RoseofTexas

181 posted on 10/27/2006 9:42:39 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

That woman is his wife.


182 posted on 10/27/2006 9:42:53 AM PDT by A Citizen Reporter (Go Cards! Go Cards! Go Cards! Beat the TAR out of Detroit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: All

183 posted on 10/27/2006 9:42:59 AM PDT by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Cheapskate

"Who is the woman in the middle? She's pretty sharp lookin!"

That's Webb's wife.


184 posted on 10/27/2006 9:43:08 AM PDT by GottaLuvAkitas1 (Ronald Reagan is the TRUE "Father Of Our Country".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Go Rush Go!


185 posted on 10/27/2006 9:43:11 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade (Newt/ Rick Santorum 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

Did you hear those Dean clips on Levin last night?


186 posted on 10/27/2006 9:43:13 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: UKRaddell
Perhaps Tony should declare himself PM for life. For all his domestic mistakes, he is one guy I can rely on not to cut and run.

Yes, Tony deserves Americans' gratitude forever.

187 posted on 10/27/2006 9:43:46 AM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
James Webb celebrates his victory with former representative Leslie L. Byrne, left, and his wife, Hong Le Webb.
188 posted on 10/27/2006 9:43:56 AM PDT by A Citizen Reporter (Go Cards! Go Cards! Go Cards! Beat the TAR out of Detroit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

Yup it looks as if the Dummies have themselves a tarbaby.

Can I say tarbaby?


189 posted on 10/27/2006 9:44:13 AM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Hey all!

Here's today's Dilbert:


190 posted on 10/27/2006 9:44:18 AM PDT by Sensei Ern (http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy - For a good time visit www.laurelbaptisttemple.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
That woman is his wife.

She looks quite a bit younger than him.

191 posted on 10/27/2006 9:44:26 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Bwaahahaa


192 posted on 10/27/2006 9:44:39 AM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Bawhahahahha....Can you fix it to have Pelosi, Ried, Webb and the VOMIT FROM HELL hiltery faces on the characters bodies?


193 posted on 10/27/2006 9:44:48 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade

I agree with Rush--The Dems love telling Repubs whom to throw out--and then getting Rinos to agree---Sorry, not going to happen


194 posted on 10/27/2006 9:44:51 AM PDT by Neverforget01 (Republicans resign; Democrats run for reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC
Macaca.

Banana.

– Something to Die For: "Fogarty . . . watch[ed] a naked young stripper do the splits over a banana. She stood back up, her face smiling proudly and her round breasts glistening from a spotlight in the dim bar, and left the banana on the bar, cut in four equal sections by the muscles of her vagina."

William Morrow and Company, Inc., NY 1991, 1st Ed. (hardcover), p. 36.
Quote is from para. 29, Chap. 2 “The South China Sea,”, Section 2

OKaaaaaaaaaay then. Man, this guy is creepy.

Someone tell me, what was so bad about the Foley thing again?

195 posted on 10/27/2006 9:45:00 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: All

"Hey DUmmies...MERRY FITZMAS!"

196 posted on 10/27/2006 9:45:09 AM PDT by RasterMaster (Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: GottaLuvAkitas1

Wow!


197 posted on 10/27/2006 9:45:34 AM PDT by Cheapskate ( Preserve your freedom! ! Slap down the NANNY STATE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
I just freaked out at the sight of a Card Catalog that I received for the "HOLIDAY" so I had to send the following email to some poor soul who probably has nothing to do with the making of the catalog.

I just received your Catalog for the HOLIDAY CARDS.

I WAS WONDERING WHAT HOLIDAY IS IT EXACTLY?


CAN WE SAY CHRISTMAS?

DO YOU HAVE ANY CHRISTMAS CARDS OR HAS THE HATE GOD CROWD DISAPPROVE OF ANY CARDS THAT SPECIFY THE CHRISTMAS SEASON.

NEEDLESS TO SAY YOUR CATALOGUE IS IN THE GARBAGE!


MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM THIS CHRISTIAN.
198 posted on 10/27/2006 9:45:34 AM PDT by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Have to listen again....I missed some of the show.


199 posted on 10/27/2006 9:45:41 AM PDT by RasterMaster (Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Sensei Ern

I love Dilbert!


200 posted on 10/27/2006 9:45:58 AM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 661-662 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson