Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sageb1; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; Quix; Mr. Silverback; Caleb1411; logos
Your post zeroed in on the essence of it all ... Dawkins assumes his own status as godhood and thus moral responsibility which begins and ends with himself. From such an arrogant position it is near impossible to even comprehend his own error in reasoning, yet the error is blatant. Dawkins may have free will as his own god, but no one else may have free will if their choices obstruct his will. Truth is, only with a God of the creation in which we are creatures may we each have free will since we answer ultimately to the highest authority ... which is not Richard Dawkins, not any government, not any whim of nature or even the natural destruction of that which is matter in nature, for the soul is more than the matter in the mechanism and the spirit is more than the soul of the mechanism. Someone might want to ask Dawkins by what standard Stalin was evil or bad ... alas, Richard will obfuscate the obvious even from his own mind because he is unable to be free to be loved by his creator since he holds himself to be god to himself.
140 posted on 11/12/2006 9:19:57 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Well said, MHGinTN! Very well said indeed. Thank you!
142 posted on 11/12/2006 12:02:24 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN

Your post zeroed in on the essence of it all ... Dawkins assumes his own status as godhood and thus moral responsibility which begins and ends with himself. From such an arrogant position it is near impossible to even comprehend his own error in reasoning, yet the error is blatant. Dawkins may have free will as his own god, but no one else may have free will if their choices obstruct his will. Truth is, only with a God of the creation in which we are creatures may we each have free will since we answer ultimately to the highest authority ... which is not Richard Dawkins, not any government, not any whim of nature or even the natural destruction of that which is matter in nature, for the soul is more than the matter in the mechanism and the spirit is more than the soul of the mechanism. Someone might want to ask Dawkins by what standard Stalin was evil or bad ... alas, Richard will obfuscate the obvious even from his own mind because he is unable to be free to be loved by his creator since he holds himself to be god to himself.

= = =

Excellent points.

Thanks.


143 posted on 11/12/2006 12:43:23 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson