Skip to comments.
First liver grown from stem cells offers hope for transplant patients
The Scotsman ^
| 10-31-06
| WestVirginiaRebel
Posted on 10/30/2006 4:39:17 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel
AN ARTIFICIAL liver has been grown for the first time from stem cells, it emerged last night.
The breakthrough by British scientists is considered the vital first step towards creating a fully artificial liver that could be used to tackle ever-growing waiting lists for transplants within as little as ten years.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.scotsman.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: adultstemcells; chianti; cordblood; faverbeans; liver; medicalbreakthroughs; science; stemcellresearch; stemcells; tpl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-60 next last
Wow. Science marches on...
To: WestVirginiaRebel
2
posted on
10/30/2006 4:41:22 PM PST
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
3
posted on
10/30/2006 4:41:49 PM PST
by
Mrs.Z
To: WestVirginiaRebel
If it is your stem cells, how come it's artificial?
4
posted on
10/30/2006 4:41:58 PM PST
by
CindyDawg
To: WestVirginiaRebel
A team based at Newcastle University grew the miniature liver, using stem cells taken from umbilical cords.Adult stem cells. Not gonna satisfy the utilitarians, gotta have dead embryos to make them happy.
Paging Michael J Fox, Paging Claire McCaskill, Paging Ben Cardin etc, etc..
5
posted on
10/30/2006 4:43:16 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
(PUNCH foley for Joe Negron!)
To: Mrs.Z
Embryonic or adult?
Neither. According to the article the stem cells were taken from umbilical cords.
6
posted on
10/30/2006 4:44:25 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
7
posted on
10/30/2006 4:44:48 PM PST
by
Fawn
To: WestVirginiaRebel
To: WestVirginiaRebel
9
posted on
10/30/2006 4:46:58 PM PST
by
Finalapproach29er
(Dems will impeach Bush if given a chance.)
To: Mrs.Z
Umbilical cord stem cells. That is ADULT stem cells.
"Adult" stem cells would more appropriately be called "Mature" stem cells. They are fully formed, and come from many different sources, including umbilical cord blood.
10
posted on
10/30/2006 4:47:53 PM PST
by
Prov3456
To: Man50D; maica
Neither. According to the article the stem cells were taken from umbilical cords.I think that "adult" means everything beyond the embryonic stage. In that case, unbilibal cord cells are certainly adult. The information industry certainly doesn't want us to be clear on this issue.
To: Mrs.Z
Got to be adult...lots of tumors with the Embryonic stem cells.
12
posted on
10/30/2006 4:50:00 PM PST
by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: Freee-dame
Just so. There is no moral problem with making use of the umbilical cord or placenta after birth.
13
posted on
10/30/2006 4:50:45 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: jwalsh07
14
posted on
10/30/2006 4:52:13 PM PST
by
visualops
(artlife.us)
15
posted on
10/30/2006 4:55:34 PM PST
by
clyde asbury
(I less than 3 you.)
To: Man50D
" Neither. According to the article the stem cells were taken from umbilical cords."
I don't know about this. I believe umbilical cells would be considered adult stem cells. I base this on the fact that rejection can occur if you use the umbilical cells in another person. Thats why people save (at some expense) the umbilical cells from their children.
16
posted on
10/30/2006 4:56:01 PM PST
by
babygene
To: Dubya
Are you kidding?!? This is HORRIBLE news!! We'll never be rid of the Kennedys if they do this!!
17
posted on
10/30/2006 4:58:29 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
To: Redcloak
To: Redcloak; All
I have to wonder-did they also add fava beans and a nice bottle of Chianti?
19
posted on
10/30/2006 5:03:11 PM PST
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Maybe it's just because tomorrow is Halloween, but I had a vision of "FrankenTeddy" pop into my oddyknocky when I read that article. I'm still a bit shaken up by the experience.
20
posted on
10/30/2006 5:04:46 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
To: Redcloak
Great! No more of this stuff:
Part V: Live Organ Transplants
[Mr Brown answers the door of his home to find two men dressed in white labcoats.]
Labcoat #1: Hello. Uh
can we have your liver?
Mr Brown: What?
Labcoat #1: Your liver. It's a large, uh
glandular organ in your abdomen.
[Mr Brown just stares at the labcoated men.]
Labcoat #1: You know, it's, uh
it's reddish-brown; it's sort of, uh
Mr Brown: Yeah, y-yeah, I know what it is, but
I'm using it! I
[The labcoated men push into the house. The second man holds Mr Brown against the wall.]
Labcoat #2: Go on, sir! Don't muck us up, now!
[The first labcoated man searches him and pulls out a card.]
Labcoat #1: Hel-lo! What's this, then?
Mr Brown: A liver donor's card.
Labcoat #1: Need we say more?
Labcoat #2: No!
Mr Brown: Listen! I can't give it to you now. It says, 'in the event of death'. Uh. Oh! Ah. Ah. Eh.
Labcoat #1: No one who has ever had their liver taken out by us has survived.
Mr Brown: Agh.
Labcoat #2: Just lie there, sir. It won't take a minute.
[The Labcoats used dangerous stuff and broke Mr Brown's liver.]
Mr. Brown: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh!
Labcoat #1: Zip it up.
Man in Pink: [singing]
So, remember when you're feeling very small and insecure,
How amazingly unlikely is your birth!
And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space,
'Cause there's bugger-all down here on planet Earth.
21
posted on
10/30/2006 5:15:20 PM PST
by
rfp1234
(I've had it up to my keyster with these leaks!!! - - - Ronald Reagan)
To: Freee-dame
"I think that "adult" means everything beyond the embryonic stage. In that case, unbilibal cord cells are certainly adult. The information industry certainly doesn't want us to be clear on this issue."
That's what I understood Rush to say today.
22
posted on
10/30/2006 5:15:59 PM PST
by
Let's Roll
( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
To: Prov3456
Mostly correct. The stem cells in the umbilical cord are present in the jelly, and are properly titled Mesenchymal stem cells. These are classified as adult cells.
The difference is actually in the level of differentiation. Embryonic stem cells are completely undifferentiated, meaning they can potentially be grown into any sort of cell present in the body. "Adult" stem cells are already partially differentiated, limiting the types of cells they can be transformed into. Mesenchymal stem cells, for example, can be transformed into bone, cartilage, muscle, fat, or neurons. It can also be turned into a couple of internal organs (like the pancreas or liver). You can't turn them into stomach, lung, hair, eye, or any other cells outside of their original differentiation, however, because the DNA data needed for those transformations have already been lost
To: jwalsh07
Adult stem cells. Not gonna satisfy the utilitarians, gotta have dead embryos to make them happy.
Well, if they read just a bit further into the article, THIS should make them "happy":
Earlier this month, it emerged that Scotland will become the first place in Europe to sell useable human stem cells. A £2 million centre will market the cells to researchers attempting to find cures and treatments for diseases such as Parkinson's, diabetes and leukaemia.
The Roslin Cells Centre in Midlothian will produce human stem-cell "lines" from donated eggs and embryos to be sold worldwide on a non-profit basis. They will go to universities, the NHS and commercial concerns for testing and developing new drugs.
The joint project is a partnership between the Roslin Institute - which created Dolly the sheep - Edinburgh University and the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service.
24
posted on
10/30/2006 5:31:23 PM PST
by
Zetman
(I believe the children are the next generation.)
To: Zetman
It undoubtedly will. Interesting that folks are now marketing the parts of human beings in Europe.
25
posted on
10/30/2006 5:34:32 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
(PUNCH foley for Joe Negron!)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
What a wonderful process invention .... does this mean 40 more years of Ted "The swimmer" Kennedy in the Senate though? A new liver for him and he might never go away.
26
posted on
10/30/2006 5:34:44 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(To liberals: Dead enemies need no political or diplomatic solutions.)
To: Redcloak
27
posted on
10/30/2006 5:51:01 PM PST
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: WestVirginiaRebel
Just yesterday on Fox news Chuck Schummer said that scientists have said that embryonic stem cells offer the best hope for medical research. He failed to mention that so far nothing has been accomplished with embryonic stem cells.
Why is the left so hell-bent on destroying innocent human life? Schummer acted as though adult stem cells aren't an option and embryonic would save the world. They accuse conservatives of fear-mongering, yet it's perfectly okay for the libs to offer false hope.
To: MoralSense; Mjaye; The Game Hen; Chesterbelloc; Petes Sandy Girl; MarMema; From many - one.; ...
30
posted on
10/30/2006 6:13:16 PM PST
by
Born Conservative
(Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
To: Mrs.Z
The article said cord blood stem cells were used.
Doubtless they'll try to get the same technique to work with adult stem cells, since auto-donation removes the need for anti-rejection drugs.
31
posted on
10/30/2006 6:19:56 PM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: WestVirginiaRebel; AntiGuv; Coleus; neverdem
non-embryonic stem cell ping. (from umbilical cords, so adult seems off).
To: WestVirginiaRebel
There is little religious opposition to the use of adult (or non-embryonic) stem cells. And umbilical cord blood stem cells do count as adult?
To: Jedi Master Pikachu; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; ...
34
posted on
10/30/2006 6:47:46 PM PST
by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
"Last year, Prof McGuckin, while working at London's Kingston University, announced he had obtained stem cells from babies' umbilical cord blood, which appeared to be very similar to human embryonic stem cells, and used them to grow liver tissue. "
Yes, UMBILICAL CORD BLOOD is promising and making progress - NOT EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS!
35
posted on
10/30/2006 6:56:43 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
This breakthrough is with ADULT STEM CELLS.
36
posted on
10/30/2006 6:57:28 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: Viracocha
"...dismantling a days-old zygote for stem cells..." You tread upon the slippery slope.
At what point do you choose to draw your line?
That is the danger of your way of thinking.
To: WestVirginiaRebel
If this is successful for a liver, I wonder why it can't work for a kidney.
My daughter's kidneys are failing, perhaps there is some hope.
Even so, I stand firmly against any embryonic stem cell research...
To: Viracocha
Be gentle folks, Why?
it's my first post.
In which you advocate the deliberate killing of embryonic people ... and display a rather odd understanding of embryology and a gross ignorance of the state of proven ADULT stem-cell based therapy.
But that's OK ... if you manage not to get zotted, you might learn something. Eventually, for example, the Keeper of the Adult Stem Cell Therapy list will post the long list of "SOUNDLY PROVEN" cures for disease that don't require killing people to get stem cells.
39
posted on
10/30/2006 7:24:55 PM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Repeal The 17th
I wonder why it can't work for a kidney. In theory, no reason not. In practice ... a kidney is a somewhat more complicated organ than a liver. I can understand why he tried growing liver first.
40
posted on
10/30/2006 7:27:53 PM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
A free and virtuous society, which America aspires to be, must reject practices that devalue and violate human life at any stage from conception until natural death. In defending the right to life, in law and through a vibrant culture of life, America can show a world the path to a truly humane future in which man remains the master, not the product of his technology.
REMARKS BY JOHN PAUL II to PRESIDENT BUSH
July 23, 2001
Pro-Life PING
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
41
posted on
10/30/2006 7:37:37 PM PST
by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: Freee-dame; Man50D; maica
Technically, the cells from umbilical cord blood are "fetal." However, most of us call them adult, since they are harvested at birth.
The better term for ethical stem cells is "non-embryonic" stem cells --- even better: non-destructive.
42
posted on
10/30/2006 8:01:03 PM PST
by
hocndoc
(http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
These must be ADUKT STem Cells because GOD would NEVER allow his PURE gift of life to be destroyed to have some sinner healed of some disease.
To: Arthalion
The only cells that are "undifferentiated" are in the zygote, the single cell embryo, up to about the 8 to 10 cell stage. After that, the cells are at least differentiated to become trophoblast or epiblast - the placenta or body cells.
DNA doesn't become "lost." Genes are turned on and off.
44
posted on
10/30/2006 8:05:20 PM PST
by
hocndoc
(http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
To: shield
Embryonic Cells have ONLY produced TUMORS!!
To: Viracocha
Well, you goofed up on your first post.I suggest you do more research before your second.
The human embryo can only make human proteins - which are different enough that there's a whole lot of fuss over "human embryonic stem cells."
46
posted on
10/30/2006 8:07:56 PM PST
by
hocndoc
(http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
To: WestVirginiaRebel
Now all they have to do is clone favre beans and we can have a Red Dragon dinner party.
47
posted on
10/30/2006 8:12:36 PM PST
by
Thickman
(++)
To: Man50D; Freee-dame; babygene
"Neither. According to the article the stem cells were taken from umbilical cords."
I don't know which it is...but I think the term I've heard applied to stem
cells taken from umbilical cord blood was called "embryonic
stem cells".
I don't know if that's technically correct, but I know that some of
the "evangelists" for the use of embryonic stem cells from clones...HATE
the idea of using stem cells from stored umbilical cord blood.
Their minions at The Los Angeles Times ran a hit-piece on banking of
umbilical cord blood; the article also gave the name/address of a
lawyer trying to drum up a class-action lawsuit against the umbilical cord blood banks.
It was nothing more than a bald-faced attempt to drive all competitors to
ESCs (from clones) from the field.
48
posted on
10/30/2006 8:17:53 PM PST
by
VOA
To: Jedi Master Pikachu; Coleus; Peach; airborne; Asphalt; Dr. Scarpetta; I'm ALL Right!; ...
49
posted on
10/30/2006 9:59:31 PM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: Freee-dame
Non-embryonic
50
posted on
10/30/2006 10:15:06 PM PST
by
Lexinom
(www.VoteYesForLife.com -- Pray.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson