Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Senator Ted) Kennedy Offered to Help Soviets Thwart U.S. Policies, KGB Papers Show
Cybercast News Service ^ | November 2, 2006 | Kevin Mooney

Posted on 11/02/2006 9:51:17 AM PST by Clintonfatigued

While Soviet troops occupied Afghanistan in 1980, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) worked in close concert with high level Kremlin officials to alter the direction of U.S. policy, according to documents made available through a KGB defector.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Russia; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 1980; america; andropov; armsrace; brezhnev; carter; cccp; coldwar; coldwar2; communist; edwardkennedy; evilempire; fatredted; foreignpolicy; gorbachev; kennedy; kgb; kgbdocuments; putin; reagan; russia; senatorkennedy; senatortunney; sovietunion; subversion; swimmer; tedkennedy; thedrunkswimmah; theswimmer; traitor; treason; tunney; unitedstates; usa; ussr; vladimirputin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: Clintonfatigued

Kennedy's Venona cables.


21 posted on 11/02/2006 9:58:22 AM PST by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camas

Rush has to be notified about this to get on it. Perhaps you can give his show a call.

(I'm on my lunch break and don't have time)


22 posted on 11/02/2006 9:58:54 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (Nihilism is at the heart of Islamic culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The Great One Mark Levin broke this story last week.


23 posted on 11/02/2006 9:59:54 AM PST by Long Island Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

This is news???

You mean we didn't know this already????

All this means is that there's a piece of paper that claims to prove that which we already knew.


24 posted on 11/02/2006 10:01:06 AM PST by Wombat101 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Tired of Taxes; DaveLoneRanger; Republicanprofessor; Txsleuth; Texasforever; ...

Everybody who has a ping list, regardless of its topic, should ping this article.


25 posted on 11/02/2006 10:01:14 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (Nihilism is at the heart of Islamic culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thatcher
Kennedy Offered to Help Soviets Thwart U.S. Policies, KGB Papers Show
By Kevin Mooney
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
November 02, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - While Soviet troops occupied Afghanistan in 1980, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) worked in close concert with high level Kremlin officials to alter the direction of U.S. policy, according to documents made available through a KGB defector.

Details concerning Kennedy's correspondence with KGB agents are included in the writings of the late Vasiliy Mitrokhin who defected to Britain in 1992. The Mitrokhin papers highlight a meeting that took place at the behest of Kennedy between former Sen. John Tunney (D-Calif.) and KGB agents in Moscow on March 5, 1980.

The exchange of information between Tunney and the KGB is included as part of a report Mitrokhin filed with the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington D.C. The former KGB man continued to work with British intelligence until the time of his death.

Noted Cold War author and researcher Herbert Romerstein told Cybercast News Service Mitrokhin was a "highly credible source" with vast knowledge of the now-closed KGB archives.

Prior to his defection, Mitrokhin made meticulous copies of KGB documents by hand, explained Romerstein, who headed the U.S. government's Office to Counter Soviet Disinformation and Active Measures during the 1980s.

The KGB defector smuggled out six cases of notes that formed the basis of his reporting.

The KGB files Mitrokhin retrieved indicate that Kennedy fixed the blame for heightened international tensions on the Carter White House, not on the Kremlin. Kennedy at the time was challenging incumbent Carter for the Democratic nomination for president.

Tunney told his KGB counterparts that Kennedy was impressed by the foreign policy statements made by then General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev. Kennedy saw in Brezhnev a leader who was firmly committed to the policy of "détente," the report said.

But, in Kennedy's estimation, the Carter administration had assumed an overly belligerent posture toward the Soviet Union after the invasion of Afghanistan, Mitrokhin wrote.

In Kennedy's view, "the atmosphere of tension and hostility towards the whole Soviet people was being fuelled by Carter" as well as by some key advisors, the Pentagon and the U.S. military industrial complex, the Mitrokhin report states.

Throughout the meeting Tunney remained focused on the separation between Kennedy's proposals and the official stance of the Carter White House. While official U.S. policy called for the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan, Kennedy avoided "touching the question of the legality of the presence of Soviet troops," Mitrokhin reported.

Instead, Kennedy relayed through his envoy, Tunney, his support for a withdrawal of Soviet forces that would be coupled with policy directives that "guaranteed non-interference" by competing foreign powers in the internal affairs of Afghanistan.

Since there was intense disagreement between Kennedy and the administration on policy toward the Soviets, Tunney told the KGB that the Massachusetts senator had concluded "it was his duty to take action himself, which could force the Carter administration to act to de-escalate the crisis," Mitrokhin wrote.

In 1980 Kennedy lost to Carter in the Democratic primary, and the incumbent in turn lost to Ronald Reagan in the general election.

As was previously reported by the Cybercast News Service Kennedy also subsequently made overtures to Soviet officials aimed at thwarting Reagan's military buildup in the 1980s.

Kennedy had offered to help the Soviets organize a public relations campaign in the U.S. that would dilute support for Reagan's policies. Once again, it was Tunney who traveled to Moscow on Kennedy's behalf to relay the senator's proposals.

The particulars of Kennedy's proposals are discussed in a letter dated May 14, 1983, that was sent from the head of the KGB to Yuri Andropov, who was then general secretary. Romerstein acquired a copy of the letter from a contact in Moscow who had access to the Kremlin archives.

"The letter speaks to the degree of opposition and the lack of understanding liberals like Kennedy had toward Reagan's policies," said Lee Edwards, a distinguished fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

"Reagan knew we had to build up our armed forces before we could apply pressure to the Soviets." The notion of fighting to win the Cold War was an alien concept to liberals like Kennedy, Edwards added, because they had grown accustomed to the policies of containment.

A copy of the letter is reproduced in a new book entitled "The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism." The author, Paul Kengor is a professor of political science at Grove City College.

The pattern of behavior should concern members of both political parties, Kengor said, because it shows Kennedy was willing to work against American foreign policy, regardless of who occupied the White House.

In his book, Kengor points out that Tunney acknowledged making 15 separate trips to the Soviet Union where he acted as an intermediary not only for Kennedy but for other U.S. senators.

'Clear violation'

Charles Dunn, dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University, told Cybercast News Service Kennedy's activities were in "clear violation of the U.S. Constitution and at the expense of presidential authority."

The secret overtures to the KGB during the Reagan years were particularly insidious, Dunn said, because Tunney and Kennedy were working to undermine what ultimately proved to be a very successful policy that brought an end to the Cold War.

"If another country gets the idea that it can deal outside of official channels then that undermines presidential leadership," he said.

For his part, Romerstein said that Kennedy, and other senators, may have violated the Logan Act, which has been on the books since 1799, but is rarely enforced. The law prohibits American citizens from engaging in private diplomacy with a foreign government with the intention of influencing public policy.

At the same time, however, Romerstein cautions against viewing Kennedy as an agent for the Soviets. Instead, he said, it is appropriate to label him a "collaborationist" who sought out Soviet contacts to advance his own interests, not theirs.

When Kennedy spoke highly of Soviet leaders like Brezhnev and Andropov, he may have been "pretending," in an attempt to curry favor, Romerstein said.

"He [Kennedy] was no more loyal to the Soviets than he was to the United States.," Romerstein said.

Kennedy's office was contacted but declined to comment on the communication the senator had with the KGB, as reported in the Mitrokhin papers.

 

26 posted on 11/02/2006 10:01:58 AM PST by antonia (Build the Wall Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Now, someone explain to me why this isn't treason?

If somone can expalin it, share it with me. I don't understand either...

27 posted on 11/02/2006 10:02:28 AM PST by GOPJ (MSM's so busy kissing democrat butt that they miss big stories. Come up for air guys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Why you big fat traitorous bastard

28 posted on 11/02/2006 10:03:22 AM PST by Vaquero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Island Pete

It came out last week as prelude to the book, out this week!


29 posted on 11/02/2006 10:03:30 AM PST by Solamente (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

What ar4e ping lists and what do they do? Just curious? (I'm technologically challenged)


30 posted on 11/02/2006 10:03:53 AM PST by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; johnny7; george76; Brilliant; Torie; honolulugal; mariabush; bigfootbob; NormsRevenge; ...

"Now, someone explain to me why this isn't treason?"

Good question.


31 posted on 11/02/2006 10:04:22 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (Nihilism is at the heart of Islamic culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

They're lists of people interested in a particular topic. A certain poster keeps the name, and sends articles related to that topic.


32 posted on 11/02/2006 10:05:07 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (Nihilism is at the heart of Islamic culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Fat Red Ted...


33 posted on 11/02/2006 10:05:21 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Mashed potatoes, gravy, and cranberry sauce! Wooooooo-oooooooo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

I wouldn't care if the story was ever covered by MSM, but cannot understand why it has not been raised within the Senate itself.


34 posted on 11/02/2006 10:06:55 AM PST by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; ...

PING!

The Drunk Swimmah subverts foreign policy...


35 posted on 11/02/2006 10:06:58 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Mashed potatoes, gravy, and cranberry sauce! Wooooooo-oooooooo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
36 posted on 11/02/2006 10:07:58 AM PST by EX52D (Life is a stage, and we are merely players...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets

I submitted to Drudge, but the more the merrier


37 posted on 11/02/2006 10:08:02 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

There once was a Senator from Mass
Who was looking to hide some of his past
We lucked out and found it
Hoped the MSM would rebound it
Instead they just took a pass


38 posted on 11/02/2006 10:09:13 AM PST by badpacifist (I want you, I need you. But there ain't no way I'm ever gonna love you. So don't be sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Already done...


39 posted on 11/02/2006 10:10:08 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Mashed potatoes, gravy, and cranberry sauce! Wooooooo-oooooooo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: beaelysium
Ted Kennedy: Iraq war's Jane Fonda (Great Read!)
WorldNetDaily ^ | 2/12/05 | Peter Parisi

Posted on 02/12/2005 7:40:07 PM PST by wagglebee

The votes have been cast – if not yet fully counted – and Sen. Edward M. Kennedy owes the brave people of Iraq a profound apology. Some 8 million Iraqis on Jan. 30 defied terrorists' threats of violence and death to cast their ballots for a more hopeful future than Mr. Kennedy was willing to grant them. In so doing, Iraqis, who hadn't voted in free elections in a half-century, gave the lie to the Massachusetts Democrat's nakedly partisan rant three days before the balloting that the war that made the voting possible was "a colossal failure, a continuing quagmire." In fact, although about three dozen people – minus the eight suicide bombers – died in election-related violence, the terrorists' vow to wreak maximum havoc nationwide to minimize the turnout and thereby render the vote illegitimate was what was the true "colossal failure."

Indeed, Iraqi voters gave the collective finger, a purple dye-stained finger, to the thugs and assassins – and to Mr. Kennedy, whose diatribe at Johns Hopkins' School of Advanced International Studies Jan. 27 gave demagoguery a bad name. For Mr. Kennedy to characterize the Iraq war as "Bush's Vietnam" in advance of the balloting served only to give propaganda aid and comfort to terror mastermind Abu Musab Zarqawi and his henchmen. But beyond that, it grossly misrepresents the Vietnam War – specifically, the U.S. conduct of the war and the lessons thereof.  more

 


40 posted on 11/02/2006 10:10:23 AM PST by antonia (Build the Wall Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson