Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stealth jet quietly slips into history
Toronto Star ^ | Thu. Nov. 2, 2006 | Bill Taylor

Posted on 11/02/2006 4:16:00 PM PST by NucSubs

Stealth jet quietly slips into history F-117A fighter retired after 25 years Cutting-edge design cloaked in mystery Nov. 2, 2006. 12:54 PM BILL TAYLOR FEATURE WRITER

Almost as furtively as it flew above war zones from Bosnia to Baghdad, America's F-117A Nighthawk stealth fighter has retired from active duty.

The years had snuck up on it. Though it remained cutting-edge contemporary in many people's minds, the Nighthawk had hit the quarter-century mark. At a discreet "Silver Stealth" ceremony at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico this week, some of the people who built, serviced and flew the plane marked the end of its 25-year career.

Much of the F-117A's innermost workings remain top-secret but it was outstripped by newer, even more space-age technology. All that remained was its public image. Its successor, the F-22 Raptor, appeared on the last day of the Canadian International Air Show in Toronto in September, its first foray outside the United States. The Raptor looks more like a conventional jet than the F-117A and didn't cause much excitement, other than among hard-core aviation buffs. When the Nighthawk made its Toronto debut in 1993, as it whispered over Ontario Place the crowd went crazy, pointing and yelling, "Stealth! Stealth!"


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: f117; f117a; history; military; nighthawk; stealthfighter; stealthjet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: taildragger
Let us hope they don't destroy the tooling on the C-17, like Boeing did on the 717 (DC-9 w/ P & W 2500's.

Oh they will. It is SOP to do that when an aircraft goes out of production. It is likely they've already destroyed the tools & dies for the 757.

41 posted on 11/02/2006 5:14:01 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Somebody here keeps bringing this up to which I say, so what.

Among the most important reasons to get rid of that equipment is that Iran couldn't benefit by still having it around.

Any new lines of the Tomcat would include improvements to the original and later models. The plane would use plenty of composites making most of the existing production equipment useless. Modifications would probably cost more than new rigs and tools.


42 posted on 11/02/2006 5:15:14 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
The first two dictionaries I looked at said 'snuck' was OK.

"snuck" is correct grammar:
["done snuck up on youse" is not :) ]

4 results for: snuck
sneak /snik/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[sneek] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation verb, sneaked or snuck, sneak¡Eing, noun
¡Vverb (used without object)
1. to go in a stealthy or furtive manner; slink; skulk.
2. to act in a furtive or underhand way.
3. British Informal. to tattle; inform.

43 posted on 11/02/2006 5:16:02 PM PST by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs

waaaahhhh


44 posted on 11/02/2006 5:16:33 PM PST by Chili Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I heard there was an F22 test result where they could drop bombs on target from outside the range of any SAM known to the military.


45 posted on 11/02/2006 5:17:15 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
J145,

Say it isn't so. I have been in aerospace were an engine in the fleet that still needs parts the tooling remains. But to destroy the tooling for such a bird when G_d forbid we would ever need massive amounts of them and soon, would leave us high and dry.

46 posted on 11/02/2006 5:18:47 PM PST by taildragger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Am I 100% certain they will? No.

Would I bet money that they're going to destroy the equipment? Oh yes.

47 posted on 11/02/2006 5:21:35 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Besides being high maintenance, all it does is drop two bombs and go home. It is a very specialized aircraft.


48 posted on 11/02/2006 5:21:44 PM PST by MediaMole (9/11 - We have already forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
They are going to live in the desert wrapped in plastic waiting for the day when they may be needed again. They join about 50 B-1B's and hundreds of other aircraft. Also, since the F-117 was built with many parts from other planes (the landing gear is F-16 as i recall) the older ones will become parts supplies.
49 posted on 11/02/2006 5:22:30 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs; All

You should have mentioned this is an excerpt from the article. There is more at the link.


50 posted on 11/02/2006 5:24:14 PM PST by faq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs
America's F-117A Nighthawk stealth fighter has retired from active duty.

Was the F-117A really a fighter? I had only ever heard of it filling more of a ground attack role. Did it have any air-to-air weaponry and did it ever engage an enemy aircraft?

51 posted on 11/02/2006 5:24:19 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs
Image hosted by Photobucket.com ultimate cruise missile...
52 posted on 11/02/2006 5:29:01 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Babu

How do you pronounce ÂÂÂÂÂÂ


53 posted on 11/02/2006 5:31:08 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs

How do you know a super secret radar invisible plane is not being still used?


54 posted on 11/02/2006 5:32:57 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
SNUCK

SNEAKED

In American English “snuck” has become increasingly common as the past tense of “sneak.” This is one of many cases in which people’s humorously self-conscious use of dialect has influenced others to adopt it as standard and it is now often seen even in sophisticated writing in the U.S. But it is safer to use the traditional form: “sneaked.”

55 posted on 11/02/2006 5:34:24 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Ah, thanks for the info!!


56 posted on 11/02/2006 5:40:51 PM PST by Enchante (There are 3 kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and the Drive-By Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: drsbb
What I wouldn't have given to get shot off a carrier in a Tomcat, but that chance is gone (as if there was much of a chance anyway).

My roommate at the navy Department Head School was an F-14 back seater. I ran across him during a Med cruise a couple year later and he got me onto an S-3 for a cat shot and an arrested landing. Not quite the same thing but quite a rush all the same.

57 posted on 11/02/2006 5:46:30 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

It's Urdu that snuck in there, and sorry I can't pronouce urdu. :)


58 posted on 11/02/2006 6:06:37 PM PST by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus
Was the F-117A really a fighter?

I remember reading it was called a 'fighter' to make it sexier. I guess the hotshot pilots and brass think fighters > bombers.

59 posted on 11/02/2006 6:09:17 PM PST by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Enchante; Rokke; Pukin Dog

The U.S. is retiring fighters more advanced than other nations can field. That's a multi-generational technological superiority.

And yes, the F-117 should be given to Israel, Taiwan, and Japan...all of whom can afford to maintain them if desired, or fly them until they are unsafe if not.

They would also make a nice friendship gift to India.


60 posted on 11/02/2006 6:16:24 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson