U.S. Democrats ask Bush to hold summit on Iraq

Reuters ^ | November 8 2006 | Thomas Ferraro

[Dems_R_Losers]

WIth all due respect - I wouldn't bet on that.

Oh, I would. George W. is not like his father and Karl Rove is no John Sununu. Bush is not running for reelection and he is not going to hand over one smidgen of decision making on war policy to the Democrats. He is not going to play politics with our troops on the battlefield or with the safety of the homeland.

They can investigate all they want. Their crazy wing thinks there is all sorts of horrible stuff to uncover about Bush's Pentagon and CIA. There isn't. It's all trash generated by disgruntled people like Larry Johnson and Joe Wilson. Bush will call their bluff and the people will revolt just like they did to the Republicans when they impeached Clinton.

[DarthVader]

Overeach.

[dforest]

Why did I just get a security alert on this site. Seeing it as today, I would not be surprised! Woner what Rod Serling would say?

[OpusatFR]

Amerwika's Nanny is on the job!

[Cicero]

When the Democrats triumphantly say, "Come talk with us," as if they are now in charge of the country, Bush's proper response is, "I'm delighted to hear that you've finally agreed to talk with me!"

[Cobra64]

Flashbacks to Iran/Contra nonsense.

I never understood that "controversy" anyway. What does taking 53 Americans hostage for 444 days and the Shah being deposed have to do with "Contra?"

I was too young to know what all that was about.

[kinghorse]

Uh I presume this is the image that is causing my machine to go crazy with warnings about getting a security certificate issued from a dot gov server? Anyone else getting hijacked viewing this thread? What is going on here?

[day10]

I certainly hope you are correct.

[The Blitherer]

Actually, I'm not really against putting the Admin's reasons for going to war on trial. We've got tons of documentation now on the threat Saddam posed. Also, it would hopefully shine a spotlight on the lies the MSM has been feeding us about the war.

[Gay State Conservative]

The solution to all this would have been to appoint Lieberman to Defense.

[Loyolas Mattman]

Sure about that? Sure looked like it today.

[Mad Dawgg]

"BTW, where are all of those indictments of CIA leakers we were supposed to have scene?"

Those are casualties of the gangland killing of the Republican majority last night at around 9pm Eastern time!

[kinghorse]

hseep.dhs.gov

what is the reason someone is trying to trace a box location? Wow. It's a bad day but not bad enough to start tracing people.

[LYSandra]

What Happened to her comments on civility?????????????????!!! I'm going to have high or higher blood pressure before this is all over!!

[Boston Blackie]

[Jacquerie]

Why is a bipartisan summit on the state of the Iraq war a bad idea?

Right away, Pelosi is looking for cover. They have no ideas to better prosecute the war. Where have they been these past 3.5 years? At every opportunity the rats have hobbled our war making capability. A so-called summit would imply the rats give a rip about victory and elevate a demented marxist to the level of a good man, our President.

[Cobra64]

Yup. And there are more than a few FReepers cheering the b!tch on.

Name one.

[day10]

Don't know - it's annoying.

[dforest]

SHE< IT will never be civil.

[Last Laugh]

Obviously there have been a few problems with the current approach

Because the current approach was to keep the United Nations, Eurotwits and US Socialists like pelosi happy!

Bush needs to take the time before they swear these idiots in, to bomb the living Hell -o out of several major arab cities and muslim strongholds.

Then Bush can say with pride: There! Take that! WOT problem solved. Impeach me now.