Posted on 11/10/2006 3:00:44 PM PST by RussP
I actually liked Michael Savage at one time, but now I am embarrassed for him every time I hear him (which is not often). The guy has become a clueless loon.
To show off his "independence," he refused to endorse Republicans. Fantastic, Michael! Then the day after the election it finally occurred to him that a Democratic Congress is now empowered to work with Bush on his amnesty program for illegal immigrants!
What kind of moron could not figure that out *before* the election?
Thanks a lot, Michael, for sitting on your hands and doing nothing when it counted most to help stop illegal immigration. You're a true patriot, but not a very bright one!
Michael calls Rush Limbaugh a shill for the Republicans, but Rush figured out *before* the election that (1) Bush is not on the ballot, and (2) if the Republicans don't win Congress, the Democrats will. In other words, Rush passed politics 101 a long time ago, but Michael never did.
I happened to be listening yesterday when a caller tried to point this out to him. How did Michael reply? He couldn't argue rationally, so he resorted to his usual 3rd-grade-level name calling and telling the guy to change his underwear. I kid you not.
Ironically, Michael wrote a book calling liberalism a mental illness, but Michael clearly has a mental illness of his own. He has become some kind of deranged, angry clown.
You expected something else from that liberal poseur?
Apparently I wasn't pinged to them!
Go listen to your GOP cheerleader for 3 hours a day, I don't care.
Savage, Liberalism and Michael Weiner are a mental disorder.
Also, what about the judges? I amost puked the other day when (after the election) Savage gave us his (admittedly entertaining) "communist feminist lesbian judges from hell" tirade. Well thanks alot Savage for undermining the Republicans so that now we have the Demoncrat Senators from hell running the judiciary committees.
Decent judges were the one thing we were getting from Bush and the Republicans. And now, thanks in large part to b-strds like Savage and Buchanan, the radical left is again empowered to resume stacking the federal bench with their agents.
"Yesterday he thrashed Pelosi 90% of the time. She's not GOP."
Hey, wonderful. Two days after the friggin' election he starts trashing Pelosi. Before the election, when he could have helped stop her from becoming Speaker, he sat on his hands.
Why don't you read it to the ilk herd right here on FR.
You, too?!
Well that worked out great didn't it.
He thrashed Pelosi before the election.
3 hours a day... that's all we ask...
Hannity is such a p***y..
Savage and his listeners to know how much power you think he has.
The fact that a whole thread has been dedicated to Savage bashing.
Savage does not set policy. He give his opinion on policy.
Maybe the GOP should have secured the borders, cut the out of control spending, policed the curruption. Thought a little more about nominating Harriet Miers and the Dubia Ports Deal.
Maybe if the Bush Justice department has punihed the law breaking Clintonista's like Sandy Burglar instead of siccing the dogs on Curt Weldon, 3 weeks before the election... we would all be celebrating.
Although I'm sure he would be flattered, he does not have the power you seem to give him.
ok, just call me some names, that will help. ok, maybe cheerleaded wasn't a word, but the meaning is clear. savage wouldn't have turned the election had he done more cheerleading (better?) for the GOP before the election.
I love the guy but he has a screw loose.
If Bush got rid of Rumsfeld months ago as Savage was calling for, we'd have the Senate.
You think all of the conservatives who didn't vote would have shown up to vote if Rumsfeld had been fired before the election? No - Rumsfeld had little, if anything, to do with disaffected conservatives.
Trust me, I am not pinged to them either, but I find them on my own. Next one I come across, (always by accident) I will ping you. :)
Typical Savage logic. The point is not whether Savage (or anyone else) could have single-handedly changed the outcome of the election. The point is that he did not even try because he wanted to congratulate himself for being "independent." If Savage had a clue he would know that politics is a team sport.
"You Weiner-bots would walk right off the cliff if he told you too."
using your logic, all savage listeners voted republican, because savage said "I want everyone to vote republican" prior to the election. =)
That guy's nuts! Grab 'em!
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.