Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani 'Unacceptable' for President, Conservatives Say
CNSNews ^ | November 15, 2006 | Randy Hall

Posted on 11/15/2006 7:30:55 AM PST by 300magnum

Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani enjoys "a lot of good will" from Republicans from his handling of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but his stance on social issues like abortion and gun control make him an unacceptable candidate in the 2008 presidential election, according to conservative analysts.

Giuliani, who announced Monday that he has filed papers to form an exploratory committee as the first step towards a White House run, is "absolutely unacceptable under any circumstances" as a presidential candidate, Colleen Parro, executive director of the Republican National Coalition for Life, told Cybercast News Service.

"The core values of the Republican Party with respect to life issues -- which is where our main concern is -- and the issues of the homosexual movement, etc., cause his candidacy for the nomination to just be dead in the water," she said.

Giuliani has described himself as "pro-choice" and said he would not support a ban on partial-birth abortions. He promoted gun control programs and civil unions for same-sex partners during his two terms as New York City mayor.

While serving in that post, Giuliani saw his private life become a regular subject of media scrutiny, especially in 2000, when he announced at a press conference that he was seeking a separation from his second wife without first telling her of his decision.

"Despite Giuliani's charm and his obvious leadership abilities, as far as social and cultural issues are concerned, not only his personal life but his public views make him unacceptable," Parro said.

Supporters of a Giuliani bid launched a group a year ago called Draft Rudy Giuliani for President.

Co-founder Nicholas Tyszka said in a statement this week that, "with the current climate [of divisiveness] in Washington," Giuliani would be an excellent nominee, as "he has such a broad base of appeal, even cutting across political lines."

The group, whose other co-founder is veteran Republican political consultant Allen Fore, said that "America needs and wants this great man to lead our nation."

"Named Time Magazine's 'Person of the Year' in 2001, Rudy Giuliani has been a proven leader during one of the toughest periods in American history," the organization's website states.

"Giuliani exemplifies leadership, courage and compassion," it says. "Rudy Giuliani has dedicated his professional life to serving the United States, including assistant attorney general in the U.S. Justice Department under President Reagan and as the crime-fighting U.S. attorney in the state of New York.

"He has an unrivaled record of honesty and integrity, always putting the people's interest above politics," the website continues. "His service as mayor of New York City, particularly after the devastating terrorist attacks against our country on September 11, 2001, made him America's mayor. Now it's time to make him America's president."

Although forming an exploratory committee does not guarantee that an individual will run for president, Giuliani's announcement Monday drew a quick response from the Democratic National Committee:

"It's unclear whether or not Rudy Giuliani will be able to just 'explain away' the fact that he's consistently taken positions that are completely opposite to the conservative Republican base on issues they hold near and dear," said DNC Communications Director Karen Finney in a press statement.

"Throughout his career, Giuliani has tried to paint himself as a moderate, but now that he's vying for his party's nomination, will he undergo an extreme makeover in an attempt to cozy up to the far right?" Finney asked.

The DNC also issued a speedy response after Sen. John McCain made a similar announcement on Sunday.

Brian Darling, director of Senate relations for the conservative Heritage Foundation, told Cybercast News Service that "it's going to be virtually impossible for Giuliani to woo voters who put the Second Amendment and family values as their top issues."

However, Giuliani "clearly has a lot of good will with Republicans, and his goal should be to shore up his conservative credentials on the issues of federal spending and anti-terrorism," Darling said.

Since he was mayor of New York City during 9/11, Giuliani "can trumpet anti-terrorism as one of his major policies. But he also needs to talk about limiting the federal government and restricting out-of-control federal spending so he can shore up support among conservatives who care about pocketbook issues," Darling said.

While acknowledging that Giuliani is "a presumptive front-runner" for the GOP presidential nomination in 2008, Darling said the former mayor is enjoying good poll numbers "merely because he has high name recognition."

Strong approval figures don't guarantee victories when the party's primaries begin, Darling noted.

"Just ask [early 2004 Democratic front-runner] Howard Dean about that," he said.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: giuliani; hellohillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-268 next last
To: areafiftyone

Not only are they out in force, they are swinging from the vines--- ;-).


61 posted on 11/15/2006 7:59:57 AM PST by Tarheel (The checkered kaffiyeh--the swastika of the 21st century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

The Real Rudy Giuliani:

Read more about Giuliani's liberal positions here and here.

Some people want Republicans to ignore his liberalism on almost every issue and, as a distraction, they try to pretend that Rudy is fiscally conservative. Again, his record shows that he isn't fiscally conservative either:

According to an article in The Nation from 2002:

It's now apparent that Giuliani purchased the city's good times partially with borrowed money and left his successor, Mike Bloomberg, holding a bag of debt. New York City went from a $3 billion budget surplus in 1998 to a $4.5 billion deficit after Giuliani left office. This mismanagement of prosperity is a big part of his legacy. Giuliani left the city's finances in a mess...

Here are some things Giuliani did as Mayor that were NOT anywhere near being fiscally conservative:

According to the article from The Nation:

During the 1960s Giuliani was a self-described "Robert Kennedy Democrat." He identified with RFK as a liberal Catholic prosecutor. He volunteered for RFK's 1968 presidential campaign while he was a student at NYU Law School. Giuliani also voted for George McGovern in 1972. During the liberal 1960s, he was a liberal.

But in 1975 Giuliani switched his party registration from Democrat to Independent when he got a job in Gerald Ford's Justice Department, according to his mentor Harold "Ace" Tyler.

On December 8, 1980, Giuliani changed his registration from Independent to Republican. This was one month after Ronald Reagan's election, and just as he was applying for a top job in the Justice Department.

So, to sum that up:

He's a liberal. He's not even in the same building as conservative. He's only a Republican because...and this comes from his own mother, Helen Giuliani:

"He only became a Republican after he began to get all these jobs from them. He's definitely not a conservative Republican. He thinks he is, but he isn't..."

And as John Hawkins put it in an excellent article in Human Events:

Despite all of his charisma and the wonderful leadership he showed after 9/11, Rudy Giuliani is not a Reagan Republican. To the contrary, Giuliani is another Christie Todd Whitman, another Arlen Specter, another Olympia Snowe. He's a throwback to the "bad old days" before Reagan, when the GOP was run by moderate Country Club Republicans who considered conservatives to be extremists. Trying to revive that failed strategy again is likely to lead to a Democratic President in 2008 and numerous setbacks for the Republican Party.


62 posted on 11/15/2006 7:59:59 AM PST by Spiff (Death before Dhimmitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum
I will only vote for a man who walks with the Lord, and Giuliani's position on abortion and gay rights eliminates him.

A vote for Hillary or Giuliani would be forsaking the Lord IMHO.
63 posted on 11/15/2006 8:00:02 AM PST by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Enjoy Hillary.

Compliments of the RNC.

64 posted on 11/15/2006 8:00:31 AM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Wombat101
The party is doomed if Bush signs an Amnesty of any sort because it will set off a tremendous migration from the south many times larger than we have seen thus far of instant Democrat voters. Otherwise the Republican Party will certainly be hurt by adopting the policies of the far left of the Democrat party. Why vote for a closet Democrat when you can vote for the real thing? Or why bother to vote when both candidates are Democrats, with one of them calling himself a Republican so he can run. Rudy might well make a good AJ or SecDef. Your bitterness at the unfairness of it all (a true Democrat trait, that Unfairness plaint)will not alter reality, Giuliani will not get the Christian vote or the vote of people who value the 2nd Amendment and non insane social arrangements.
65 posted on 11/15/2006 8:00:37 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Halls

It's a wasted vote.

I often don't like the Republican nominee but I vote for them.

A vote for a non-electable Repub is a vote for Hillary. Don't moan and cry when she wins ... it's your fault.


66 posted on 11/15/2006 8:01:00 AM PST by BunnySlippers (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

"Yeah, like Clinton. Womanizing is bad enough but divorce and redivorce is anathema to a LARGE segment of the Republican base and to most of the Conservative base."

...except for Reagan.


67 posted on 11/15/2006 8:01:30 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

"In some cases, I think we just have to accept that some candidates are unacceptable to a lot of folks on the right."

True. But does this mean they shouldn't get a fair hearing and be subject to gratuitous trashing? This is supposed to be America, and there's supposed to be the free exchange of ideas. We creep closer to theocracy every day in this country, despite what Bill O'Reilly says.

"You may not like to hear it, but Rudy is going to cause more division and anger within our party..."

I see, so unity is good, but only if it's under a regime of strict moral and political ideology, arbitrarily applied by the self-righteous, self-appointed hall monitors of the religious right? Hmmm. that sounds an awful lot like totalitarianism to me.


68 posted on 11/15/2006 8:01:38 AM PST by Wombat101 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Wombat101

sorry I couldn't help it. ;-)


69 posted on 11/15/2006 8:02:18 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum
I know if he has what it takes to win the support of a skeptical party. We shall see.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

70 posted on 11/15/2006 8:02:32 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

oh please, I will vote for whatever Republican candidate we have, but in the primarys I will not vote for Rudy and I doubt highly he will be the our Republican candidate!


71 posted on 11/15/2006 8:02:34 AM PST by Halls (God, please grant me the serenity to accept what I can not change....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum
Rudy will win the GOP nomination and the general election with a new coalition.

I predict this coalition will dominate US politics for several decades.

72 posted on 11/15/2006 8:02:40 AM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Mrs. Clinton will. RG is the one candidate the Republicans could run that would Guarantee Clinton redux.


73 posted on 11/15/2006 8:02:41 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum
..Rudy --no

The battle for the soul of the Republican Party has begun...

74 posted on 11/15/2006 8:02:55 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Long time no see. Hope all is well with you and yours.

I'm starting to think, that by the time '08 rolls around, there will be no choice for anyone who loves liberty. Can it be that there are so few Americans remaining that have even an inkling of what the Founders intended?

Yeah, I guess Ben Franklin was right.

Regards

75 posted on 11/15/2006 8:02:58 AM PST by Tinman (Yankee by birth, Texan by Choice..."Support the Troops" shouldn't be just a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

I'm with you on that.


76 posted on 11/15/2006 8:03:08 AM PST by Rakkasan1 ((Illegal immigrants are just undocumented friends you haven't met yet!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tarheel

ROFLMAO!!


77 posted on 11/15/2006 8:03:30 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308

Compliments of stay-at-home voters. You don't get your way to take your marbles and go home.

I often don't like the nominee ... but I vote for them.

Don't moan when Hillary wins. You caused it to happen.


78 posted on 11/15/2006 8:03:38 AM PST by BunnySlippers (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: KeyesPlease

Should conservatives be put in a position of having to vote for a liberal Republican to simply stop Hillary then the Pubbies will have a serious turnout problem.
-------
The good news is we have the potential candidates pretty well pegged right now...history and facts will not change. I don't think America can afford ANOTHER liberal Republican --- certainly not a hard Marxist, like Clinton, in the White House (my worst nightmare).


79 posted on 11/15/2006 8:04:06 AM PST by EagleUSA (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 300magnum

"make him an unacceptable candidate in the 2008 presidential election, according to conservative analysts"

Here, here.

Totally unacceptable.

We need a conservative for a change.


80 posted on 11/15/2006 8:04:15 AM PST by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-268 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson