[ConservativeDude]

Depressing, isn't it?

Well, Newt is sort of hinting that Romney is the candidate of the right.

Without question, Romney is positioning himself as pro life and pro marriage (ie, not trying to promote the gay agenda).

Problem is, he was both pro gay and pro abortion as a candidate against Kennedy way back when, and also as a candidate for governor. To my knowledge he did nothing to promote homosexuality or abortion as governor, so, maybe he was a bit more conservative all along....In any event, he is saying all the right things (on those 2 issues, at least) right now.

But it is pretty sad that the best candidate of moral issues for evangelicals and orthodox Catholics is the formerly pro gay, pro choice Mormon governor of Massachusetts. Wow.

[SAJ]

Romney is at minimum a fellow traveler for the radical homosexuals. He had a chance to seize the bully pulpit here, and not only blew it, he dynamited it.

Not to mention, of course, his personal shepherding of the latest MA ''assault-weapons'' bill through the MA leg.

I don't give a warm damn about Mormonism, one way or the other. My aunt's Mormon, so who cares? But pro-abort gungrabbers who will not take a stand against the radical homos when the opportunity presents itself...need not apply.

Giuliani, McCain, Romney? None of the above. Unless Hitlery runs, in which case I will hold my nose firmly and try to vote for Rudy. Never McLame, under any circumstance; I'd sooner vote for Putin.

[Daveinyork]

Where does Romney, or all the candidates, stand on reducing government?