Posted on 11/27/2006 12:53:00 PM PST by Keyes2000mt
Felicia Benamon, in writing her weekly internet syndicated column declared, "No sooner had the 2006 Mid-Term elections ended, Democrat and Republican Presidential hopefuls lined up to announce their intentions of running for President in 2008. And so, the race is on. But we are barely over the last election and are looking to another? The politicking never ends! I need a break already!"
She expresses the thoughts of many Americans. She is nonetheless wrong. If her advice is followed, the results will be another unsatisfactory election with conservatives dazed by the speed at which the Republican nomination went to a Romney, a McCain, or a Giuliani. Edmund Burke intoned that, "Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom." While there's understandable weariness with campaign ads and constants politics, conservatives need to get over it and fast before another presidential nominating process slips away.
You have a very short window in which to pay attention to the Presidential campaign. It was not too long ago that candidates could wait until late the year before the election to announce their candidacy. Bill Clinton didn't announce until November, 1991. The Presidential Primaries were a long process. Ronald Reagan didn't get his first primary win during his 1976 challenge to Gerald Ford until May.
Welcome to the 21st Century. We've compressed the Presidential primary schedule to a period that runs from mid January to mid March. It requires countless millions to run a successful campaign.
This is not empty speculation. It is fact. If you wait until early 2008 to begin paying attention, and you'll have waited too long. America's presidential candidates are already raising money and out campaigning in Iowa and New Hampshire. Political consultants are jockeying for positions, while party leaders in the various states hope to play kingmaker. They want the book deal, the political appointment, and the big rewards that come with backing a winning candidate.
What about protecting traditional values, reforming government, limiting the size and scope of government, and all those other issues conservatives care about? It's at the back of their mind. This is a horse race and they want to ride the winning horse to further their own careers. If conservatives don't pay attention, don't get involved, and don't begin a search for candidates worthy of their support, it will be too late when Conservatives decide to pay attention.
The only way grassroots conservatives affect this process is by getting involved early, sending off small donations to their favored candidates, and getting the word out for their favored candidates. The more complacent conservatives are, the less their influence will matter in 2008.
Enjoy Christmas and New Years, but if early next year, the level of interest from conservatives in the 2008 presidential elections doesn't begin to match up with the interest of career politicians and their aspiring sycophants, don't be surprised if we end up with a nominee who doesn't share our values and will take America down the wrong road.
"Giuliani's pro-abortion. Can't vote for that.'
Pro abortion and gun grabber. He doesn't stand a chance.
It ain't McCain, and it ain't Romney. they are both gutless as politicians, both are moderates. A moderate is a sell out, and has nothing good to throw into the hat. We need a hard core "I stand for something" conservative.
Should be ex-military, must be smart - school of higher education is not the key element here, must be a leader - must be able to withstand the heat of the kitchen, must have the wherewithal to tell the msm to shove every day and any day. his cabinet CANNOT contain butt kissers, or whimps. He must have a firm grip on every situation as well as a solid background into what he is strolling into. A President's life is no game, nor is the responsibility he wields.
SS
Where does Romney, or all the candidates, stand on reducing government?
I'm sure all of them would say generically that they are for "smaller government." Even GWB would say that. Not sure if any of them have a track record in actually making government smaller (though, begrudgingly, we have to acknowledge that McCain is good on earmark reform).
SEN. JOHN McCAIN: THE ULTIMATE "RHINESTONE HERO"
SEN. JOHN McCAIN: THE ULTIMATE "RHINESTONE HERO" Part II
U.S. Sen. John McCain is no War Hero
John McCain: The Manchurian Candidate
John McCain, you treasonous bastard, I challenge you or any of your traitorous cohorts...
McCain Is Booed by Labor Activists
McCain Rides to Kerry's Rescue: "John Kerry is Not Weak on Defense" (Today Show alert)
John McCain SCREAMS AT 9/11 FSA MEMBERS FOR OPPOSING HIS BILL TO GIVE AMNESTY FOR ILLEGALS
A number of articles on McCain. (some the same as above)
McCain/Soros by Rabbi Areyh Spero
Soros' "Reform" (an article about Soros‘ instrumental hand in McCain/Feingold)
bttt
In Giuliani's world, the Bill of Rights does not include a 2nd amendment
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.