Skip to comments.
Carleton University in Canada May Prohibit Pro-Life Groups on Campus
Life News ^
| 11/28/06
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 11/28/2006 4:52:36 PM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Her proposal would state that "no CUSA resources, space, recognition or funding be allocated for anti-choice purposes." Translation:
ONLY PRO-DEATH free speech is protected.
1
posted on
11/28/2006 4:52:39 PM PST
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback; narses; 8mmMauser
2
posted on
11/28/2006 4:53:42 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
3
posted on
11/28/2006 4:54:29 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: GMMAC; fanfan
4
posted on
11/28/2006 4:55:45 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: wagglebee
"no CUSA resources, space, recognition or funding be allocated for anti-choice purposes." I suppose the irony of that is lost on the 'Pro-choice' crowd.
5
posted on
11/28/2006 4:56:33 PM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(Note: Sell Diebold Stock.................NOW!!)
To: wagglebee
Her proposal would state that "no CUSA resources, space, recognition or funding be allocated for anti-choice purposes."
According to this wording, I guess unions would fall under this. This would also apply to other organizations that restrict the choices of its members.
6
posted on
11/28/2006 4:58:31 PM PST
by
Lord Basil
(Hate isn't a family value; it's a liberal one.)
"no CUSA resources, space, recognition or funding be allocated for anti-choice purposes."
According to this wording the student government would have to deny itself funding because they are denying students a choice of what to hear and what clubs will be funded.
To: fanfan; GMMAC; Clive
Urgent Canada ping...Action needed...
8
posted on
11/28/2006 5:05:26 PM PST
by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: wagglebee
Behold the tolerance, self-confidence and intellectual vigor of the Left.
9
posted on
11/28/2006 5:07:09 PM PST
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: wagglebee
I'm glad they've begun to label us as "anti-choice".
It means that, by the same token, we can refer to them as "anti-life".
10
posted on
11/28/2006 5:09:35 PM PST
by
Nasty McPhilthy
(Those who beat their swords into plow shears….will plow for those who don’t.)
To: wagglebee
11
posted on
11/28/2006 5:39:23 PM PST
by
GOP Poet
To: wagglebee; Alexander Rubin; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; ...
Thank you both for the ping.
Canada ping.
Please send me a FReepmail to get on or off this Canada ping list.
12
posted on
11/28/2006 5:47:33 PM PST
by
fanfan
("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
To: wagglebee
Hey Katy! Just kidding.
13
posted on
11/28/2006 6:14:30 PM PST
by
period end of story
(You're an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks, to collect a bill.)
To: wagglebee
Her proposal would state that "no CUSA resources, space, recognition or funding be allocated for anti-choice purposes." Since the student government is clearly anti-choice with respect to opinions on abortion, does this mean that the defund and ban themselves?
To: wagglebee
PRO LIFE PING!!!!!!
God please protect these helpless babies.
15
posted on
11/28/2006 6:55:15 PM PST
by
sweetiepiezer
(A CARD CARRYING MEMBER OF THE VRWC!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: wagglebee
The truly unbelievable thing is the feminists profess, even demand that they can make choices regarding "their own bodies", even when that means taking the life of another body, one that they should instinctively be protecting. Yet people cannot choose what behavior to practice. They can't decide on abstinence, or birth control, because humans have no choice as to whether to have sex or with whom..........or what gender??? I suppose they would tell us because of that, they must have abortions legal.
So much of the lefts views are contradictory on so many levels.
16
posted on
11/28/2006 6:56:39 PM PST
by
gidget7
(Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; AliVeritas; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; attagirl; Augie76; ...
Wow, their arguments must be so strong if they're trying to squalch dissent.ProLife Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
17
posted on
11/28/2006 10:13:03 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(We will need to crush the Iraq Study Group like we crushed Harriet Miers. Be ready.)
To: wagglebee
18
posted on
11/29/2006 5:08:54 AM PST
by
8mmMauser
("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest.")
To: wagglebee
Pray for Canada and for this nation.
I fear we are entering into a dark time.
19
posted on
11/29/2006 6:42:12 AM PST
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Mr. Silverback
Wow, their arguments must be so strong if they're trying to squalch dissent.Believe me, they weren't. I was at the debate that prompted the complaint.
The question that was debated was, "Should elective abortion be illegal?" The pro-life advocate, taking the affirmative, argued for the humanity of the unborn, and that if the Charter of Rights guarantees life as a human right, then it must extend to the unborn as well. When the rebuttal period came, the two women arguing the pro-abortion side complained that it was "unfair" that he had raised the argument from humanity (even though it had been agreed beforehand that no restrictions would be placed on the arguments used by either side). All they had was a circular argument, really: "Abortion should not be illegal because it's legal." (Duh.)
The pro-aborts got creamed because they weren't prepared to deal with the identity of the unborn.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson