Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq, Iran reach agreement on security
AP ^ | November 29, 2006 | Nasser Karimi

Posted on 11/29/2006 8:28:12 PM PST by freedomdefender

Iraq's president said Wednesday he had reached a security agreement with Iran, which the United States accuses of fueling the chaos in the war-torn country. Iran's president called on countries to stop backing "terrorists" in Iraq and for the Americans to withdraw.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tehran is believed to back some of the Shiite militias blamed in the vicious sectarian killings that have thrown the country into chaos. The United States has said the Iraqi government should press Iran to stop interfering in its affairs in a bid to calm the violence.

Presidents Jalal Talabani of Iraq and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran held talks Wednesday hours before U.S. President George W. Bush was due to meet with the Iraqi prime minister in Jordan in talks aimed at finding a solution to Iraq's spiraling bloodshed.

Talabani gave no details on the security agreement with Iran, and Ahmadinejad made no mention of any deal at a joint press conference in Tehran.

"We discussed in the fields of security, economy, oil and industry. Our agreement was complete," Talabani told reporters. "This visit was 100 percent successful. Its result will appear soon."

It was not clear if Talabani's comments reflected an agreement by Tehran to try to rein in Shiite militias. Most of the militias are run by political parties that are a powerful part of the coalition government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. He has resisted U.S. pressure to crack down on the militias.

Ahmadinejad repeated his calls for the United States to withdraw its forces from Iraq.

"I advise you to leave Iraq," he said, addressing the Americans. "Based on a timetable, transfer the responsibilities to Iraqi government. This will agree to your interests, too."

He urged countries to stop backing militants in Iraq, saying, "supporting terrorists is the ugliest act that they can do." He did not specify which countries he was referring to.

Ahmadinejad said "extremists should be dismissed (from the Iraqi government) no matter to which group and ethnicity they belong to. This is the only way to salvation."

"Enemies of Iraq are trying to create differences and extend hostility among the Iraqi people," he said.

The United States accuses Iran and its ally Syria of stirring up violence in Iraq. Tehran denies this, saying it seeks calm in its neighbor and that an end to the bloodshed can only come when U.S. forces withdraw.

Al-Maliki and Talabani both have longtime ties with Iran. The Iraqi president has been in Iran the past three days, meeting Ahmadinejad and the country's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Talabani and Ahmadinejad attended a ceremony for the signing of two memorandums of understanding for cooperation in education and industry.

Ahmadinejad vowed that Iran "will stand by its Iraqi brothers," saying "no one can divide nations of Iran and Iraq."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: ugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Williams
I think Bush long ago wimped out, he sidelined Cheney, tossed out Rumsfeld, the Neocons left. We now are into "finding a way out." Absolutely pathetic and ineffective.

A politically correct war can never be won. Political correctness guarantees a military loss.

21 posted on 11/29/2006 9:10:55 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Realists told you this would happen over three years ago....
Exactly. We took Iran's mortal enemy out of the picture for them. Why should we be surprised that Iran now has more time and resources for mischief? Realists think about balance of power and consequences.
22 posted on 11/29/2006 9:13:57 PM PST by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
And your forgot to mention the election of Hamas to power -- yet another shining example of democracy at work in the Arab/Islamic world.

Sharia law spreading in Great Britain -- 'Courts now operate in most larger cities' (London Telegraph )

"A gripping account of how Islamism is taking control of Britain's culture and institutions." -- National Review (book)

23 posted on 11/29/2006 9:16:55 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
There is no end to the gullibility of American and Western "accomodationists", particularly in our State Department. This will lead to World War.

It's a comin'...and it's coming soon.

24 posted on 11/29/2006 9:20:29 PM PST by TigersEye (Ego chatters on endlessly. Mind speaks in great silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 21stCenturyFreeThinker
Yes, and this never made sense unless Iraq was to be a strategic point from which we could attack, control, at least pressure Iran and to some extent Syria. Instead we see ourselves caught there trying to get out. Absolutely ridiculous.

Iran is about to get control of Iraq's oil regions, and we are going to be left (maybe) with the Sunnis and Kurds as the only hands to play against the Shia.

Didn't have to be this way if we used our position to go forward, instead of wimping out. I can't imagine we are going to attack the Iranian nukes if we run from Iraq and allow Iraq to become partnered with Iran.

25 posted on 11/29/2006 9:20:44 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender; melancholy
"Iran's president called on countries to stop backing terrorists in Iraq and for America to withdraw....Ahmadinejad, vowed that Iran will stand by its Iraqi brothers, saying 'no one can divide nations of Iran and Iraq.'"

We need to bomb the daylights out of Ahmadinejad and his Iran N-O-W!!!

Nancee

26 posted on 11/29/2006 9:21:10 PM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
... has a hand in all that has happened in Iraq.
Most of what Iran has had a hand in with regards to Iraq in the last 26 years is to gas them with chemical weapons and to recover from being gassed themselves. Iran fought a bitter and destructive war with Iraq through most of the 1980s. After that they had a tense standoff along their heavily armed border. Iran shed no tears over the fall of Sadam.
27 posted on 11/29/2006 9:22:23 PM PST by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 21stCenturyFreeThinker
Exactly. We took Iran's mortal enemy out of the picture for them.

If America had been of one mind we could have brought democracy to the middle east, but US politics and the quest for personal power was more important to the left. They couldn't see the bigger picture. They won their war, but brought even more chaos to the rest of the world because of it.

28 posted on 11/29/2006 9:22:58 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Iran has agreed to only use their specially manufactured shape charges on American forces. Bastards..


29 posted on 11/29/2006 9:28:47 PM PST by steel_resolve (Do you know what a bigot is? Someone winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Yes, and this never made sense unless Iraq was to be a strategic point from which we could attack, control, at least pressure Iran and to some extent Syria.
There was a time when I thought they knew something secret that made this ridiculous situation make sense. I'm starting to see they just weren't thinking about the consequences of starting this war.

Mistakes happen in war because of the unexpected. There's probably another word to use when the expected but unplanned for happens.
30 posted on 11/29/2006 9:40:25 PM PST by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Gosh, at least now Reuters, the AP, and others don't have to pay for reporters, they can outsource them.

Guys like the Green Helment guy in Lebanon, and others. Just think, these big media organizations can save lots of money just printing stuff from the Iranian Press Service, and the DNC.

And they wonder why the media is trusted less than politicians, and they are bleeding advertising dollars and readers (slap me in the face!!!!).


31 posted on 11/29/2006 9:41:03 PM PST by girlangler (Fish Fear Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
That sounds good, blame it on the Democrats. It's easy.

Leadership means selling your policies to the voters and managing the support and resources they give you. Support for this war was at best soft when it was started. Most American's just figured it was going to happen anyway and it was the patriotic thing to do to support it. The President has constantly had trouble getting his vision across.

I don't think blaming the Democrats tells the whole story. There's plenty of blame to spread around.
32 posted on 11/29/2006 9:50:44 PM PST by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

hmmnnn,ever notice how conveniently located this $h!thole sCab Iran is relative to afghanistan And iraq? AND theres a open ocean out the backside?

I think the scab will be coming off shortly....

some of the blame needs to vest with jimmy c. he shud a dealt it then but was afraid to stir the pot. NOW look whats in the tube!


33 posted on 11/29/2006 9:53:05 PM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Iran is about to get control of Iraq's oil regions, and we are going to be left (maybe) with the Sunnis and Kurds as the only hands to play against the Shia. Didn't have to be this way if we used our position to go forward, instead of wimping out. I can't imagine we are going to attack the Iranian nukes if we run from Iraq and allow Iraq to become partnered with Iran.

Talabani is a Kurd. I can't imagine him making any partition deals with Iran.

34 posted on 11/29/2006 10:02:17 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

The Israelis better start dusting off those nukes.
They're gonna need 'em soon.


35 posted on 11/29/2006 10:21:53 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender
I don't understand why we don't squash that little iranian cockroach!
36 posted on 11/29/2006 10:22:00 PM PST by vigilante2 (Thank You Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
They didn't know the American people would choose the cut and run democrats at the time. If America as a whole had stood securely behind them, things would be a lot different today.

Yep still about us isn't it? Wouldn't matter who was elected here in the US. The election in Iraq happened before the election here in the US. The die was cast not by action or inaction here in the US. It was cast when the Iraqi people flew their purple fingers in the air and elected a legislature who eventually chose Maliki as President. Exactly what we told you would happen. The Iraqi people chose who they felt would serve their interests, not ours. And their interests are more involved with religion. So you can thank the policy of 'spreading democracy' for turning Iraq into a theocratic state in the next generation

37 posted on 11/30/2006 4:50:44 AM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nancee
saying 'no one can divide nations of Iran and Iraq.'"

We need to bomb the daylights out of Ahmadinejad and his Iran N-O-W!!!

Indeed, that idiot is talking as if Iraq and Iran are one nation already!

38 posted on 11/30/2006 4:51:06 AM PST by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
Indeed, that idiot is talking as if Iraq and Iran are one nation already!

Well, now that Saddam is gone both nations are shiite now...

39 posted on 11/30/2006 5:02:40 AM PST by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
"Indeed, that idiot is talking as if Iraq and Iran are one nation already!"

It is as he wants it to be; as he wills it to be. How Rick Santorum had been the voice of one crying in the wilderness about this. Do we have the will and the time to stop this idiot from getting us first?

Nancee

40 posted on 11/30/2006 5:33:55 AM PST by Nancee ((Nancee Lynn Cheney))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson