Posted on 11/29/2006 8:28:12 PM PST by freedomdefender
Good. Glad that's all cleared up.
Twilight Zone material.
And to think our good soldiers gave their blood for this....a sell-out "leader" in Iraq. This is beyond comprehension.
hmmm, obviously we can't trust him, or expect much, but this is a positive development.
I agree. it makes me sick to my stomach.
Please explain why and how this is a "positive" development.
Good. Glad that's all cleared up.
I'm afraid we won't be turning Iran into anything. "Engagment" is now the watchword. Of course we have no carrot or stick to offer Iran to make them stop meddling in Iraq (especially if we pull out troops) but that hasn't stopped the liberals or "realists" from insisting we go to them, hat in hand.
Perhaps it's more of a "this can't be bad" development.
But, you have a guy that has traditionally publicly called for terrorism, now denouncing it. You have Iraq and Iran seeming to take some responsibility for the violence. While remote, you also have a possible way out for the US.
Ahmanutjob said: "supporting terrorists is the ugliest act that they can do."
Pot = Kettle = Black: Whow knew?
Iran will rule Iraq. The US can get out, but when the Iraqi killing starts, we'd better do nothing but watch. It's out of our hands once Iraq surrenders to Iran.
We did more than our fair share to set them up with a decent government after we took out Saddam for our own defense. If they surrender to a mad man, let them reap what they've sown.
I don't know what you're complaining about. This official was duly elected through the process undertaken by the people of Iraq (who gave his party control of their legislature). Don't you remember seeing picture after picture of their purple fingers? And the associated back slapping and hand claps from 'conservatives' around the world? What? You didn't expect them to actually fall in line with US interests once they started using that blessed democracy Bush kept talking about it did you? Woodrow would be proud.
Just hope y'all won't be too upset when a Persian superstate (or at least a very close tie between Iraq and Iran) starts to appear (give it 15-20 years)....Woohoo, can I get a cheer for 'spreading democracy'?
P.S. Realists told you this would happen over three years ago....
nuke nuke nuke nuke
As best I can tell there is no longer a WOT in the Middle East. We have now accepted Syria and Iran although they sponsor terrorism. We are not positioned to take out the Iranian nuke program.
I think Bush long ago wimped out, he sidelined Cheney, tossed out Rumsfeld, the Neocons left. We now are into "finding a way out." Absolutely pathetic and ineffective.
They didn't know the American people would choose the cut and run democrats at the time. If America as a whole had stood securely behind them, things would be a lot different today.
What would YOU do if those who were there to help you constantly discussed packing up and leaving? Would you still listen to them, or would you take the safest route to what ever peace you could find?
I want a real live test of MOAB.......may inspire the right kind of awe needed in that region.
Thing is, many American officials were genuinely surprised when it happened.
Live Thread: President Bush and Prime Minister Malaki Press Conference (2:30 A.M. EST)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.