Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat's Quran at Oath Plan Criticized
Newsmax ^ | Dec 2, 2006 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 12/03/2006 6:08:47 AM PST by senna

Keith Ellison, who will become the first Muslim member of Congress next month, has offended some conservatives with his plan to use the Quran during his ceremonial swearing-in.

The decision by Ellison, D-Minn., to use the Muslim holy book for the ceremony instead of the Bible triggered an angry column by Dennis Prager on the Web site Townhall.com this week.

Headlined, "America, Not Keith Ellison, decides what book a congressman takes his oath on," Prager argued that using the Quran for the ceremony "undermines American civilization."

"Insofar as a member of Congress taking an oath to serve America and uphold its values is concerned, America is interested in only one book, the Bible," he wrote. "If you are incapable of taking an oath on that book, don't serve in Congress."

Conservative bloggers have picked up the criticism and run with it.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: evil; infidels; quran; violet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Mr. Ellison, First I want to congratulate you on your victory but I want to know when will Muslims admit that the Quran that is sold and presented in the USA is not the true Quran you plan to use at your swearing in? The Quran I have read that is not the watered down version I am sure you will use is violet and nothing like what Muslims try to get Americans to think it is.

When will Muslims stand up and denouse that members of your religion are sworn to change non-Muslims or as your book puts it "Infidels" Is it not your mission to change non-Muslims into members of your religion? Or as this verbage from the REAL Quran puts it:

About Those Annoying Non-Believers (Infidels, Pagans, Jews, Christians, etc.)

Qur’an 9:123 “murder them and treat them harshly” Qur’an 3.28 Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of (the guardianship of) Allah, but you should guard yourselves against them, guarding carefully; and Allah makes you cautious of (retribution from) Himself; and to Allah is the eventual coming.

NOTE: By ‘guarding carefully’, a Muslim should deceive the infidel. Acting as a friend is fine as long as it is to benefit the Muslim and protect Islam.

Qur’an 3:56 “As for those disbelieving infidels, I will punish them with a terrible agony in this world and the next. They have no one to help or save them.”

The above is from your book and should be known to all Americans and that is but one passage. If you believe youer religion is so peaceful then stand up to those that hate and want to destroy all non-Muslims. That should where you start Sir not trying to get people to believe the Quran is a peaceful book when it clearly is not. This is America and we have for 238 years sworn in our representatives with the BIBLE...I ask you Sir if I was in a Muslim country and I was voted in as a representative of the people would I be able to use the HOLY BIBLE as the book I was sworn in with? Never because first of all I never would be voted in and because our country is so free we have elected YOU but you have already angered us by asking to use the Quran.

The double standard is glaring and all Americans should know the true nature of the Quran shouldn't they? If it is so peaceful why don't you read the passage I have provided as proof of this so called peaceful book. I did not say holy book because the BIBLE is the only holy book. I have to ask why you and 99.9% of all Muslims never tell the truth about the Quran there is a reason for that isn't there Mr. Ellison?

Why are not telling the truth when it is so apparaent that your book is violet and against everything the BIBLE stands for. My religion is peaceful and I can prove that by reading any part of it on a personal, you can not say the same Sir. So I implore you to tell the truth about the watered down Quran that is passed off as the true Quran , you should start your first as a representative in the USA by telling the truth about the Quran and tell all Americans about the true nature of your book.

If I had the power to stop you from using your book I would without hesitation but I can't but I will do everything I can to bring the truth to all Americans that the Quran is not what it is professed to be, that I can do and I will. I do congratulate you on your victory even though I know it will not be good for this country unless you tell the truth and starting the very first day at your swearing in using your BOOK is a negative even before you get started.

What message does this make to those that do not know the true nature of your so-called holy book? The American people need to know the true nature of the Quran and will.

1 posted on 12/03/2006 6:08:48 AM PST by senna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: senna

Unfortunately for this story no book of any sort is used at congressional swearings in. The new congresscritters stand, en mass, and raise their right hands.


2 posted on 12/03/2006 6:14:01 AM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: senna

The above is a letter I wrote to Mr Ellison about using the Quran at his swearing in. I think this totally against what our country stands for and he is starting out on a very negative note by requesting this change of not using the bible. Most Americans do not know that the version of the quran sold in the USA is a watered down version that leaves the violet and what I call evil parts of the quran. I want to know why muslims will not tell the truth about this. Our children are exposed to a watered down version that is not the TRUE quran but a version meant to deceive, is that what we would do with our Bible? No we would not because our holy and the only HOLY book is what it is. I implore everyone that agrees with me to write Mr Ellison to protest this action because if the table were turned we would niot be able to use the BIBLE in a swearing in any muslim country obviously we would never be voted in. He is clearly using our total freedom to go against the grain and I for one am totally opposed to it.


3 posted on 12/03/2006 6:16:01 AM PST by senna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.
Unfortunately for this story no book of any sort is used at congressional swearings in. The new congresscritters stand, en mass, and raise their right hands.

Oh, don't let the truth get in the way of a good rant....

4 posted on 12/03/2006 6:23:57 AM PST by highball (Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: senna

What real difference does it make what he takes his oath on?

He, like 99% of the rest of them will not honor it anyway.


5 posted on 12/03/2006 6:28:02 AM PST by DaiHuy (There is no problem so great it cannot be solved with the application of explosives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: senna
In the US all you have to do is "affirm" ~ no book of any kind is required in court or elsewhere that an oath is given.

If the guy wants to use a Koran, fine, but it'll put a bulge in his coat pocket the rest of the day and deform the threads making him look seedy before his time.

What's important is that we not allow the Quakers to require their member of Congress to also be a Quaker (hence the "no religious test" standard in the Constitution.)

6 posted on 12/03/2006 6:29:51 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DaiHuy

I, Loyal Citizen of the Republic, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.


7 posted on 12/03/2006 6:30:33 AM PST by DaiHuy (There is no problem so great it cannot be solved with the application of explosives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DaiHuy

Has Pelosi agreed to another private swearing in with the Koran?


8 posted on 12/03/2006 6:42:41 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DaiHuy

The Constitution and the Oath to defend it, and the Quran are at odds with each other. The Congressman from Minnesota will either be a very BAD Muslim deserving Islamic punishment or death, or a very BAD Congressman deserving punishment and removal.

Since our nation was founded by individuals who were Bible believing men, when the Constitution was written, it was written in light of the Scriptures, thus no conflict.

(If both documents interpreted correctly)


9 posted on 12/03/2006 6:50:14 AM PST by uptoolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: senna

Would any elected official be allowed to take their oath on the Torah in say, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, etc.?


10 posted on 12/03/2006 7:02:43 AM PST by Spok (What if the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: senna
I think it is a great idea if all democrats were required to swear their oath on the Koran. That's where they loyalty seems to be.
11 posted on 12/03/2006 7:08:47 AM PST by oldbrowser (This war isn't over until it's OVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This is what happens when people stay home. period.


This is what happens when people vote like zombies on such stealth names just because it has a D.


Get used to it folks, the religious books will be forbidden entirely in a few elections.

In fact I am surprised the ACLU has not sued on this yet. (they need those attorney fees)


12 posted on 12/03/2006 7:13:52 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: senna

Is this legal?


13 posted on 12/03/2006 7:15:50 AM PST by Mrs Ivan (English, and damned proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: senna

What's the problem? Since he is Muslim he can use the Bible and taq'qiyah. < sp? >


14 posted on 12/03/2006 7:16:56 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

bump


15 posted on 12/03/2006 7:17:46 AM PST by JessieHelmsJr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; WKB; hail to the chief; knighthawk; MinorityRepublican
I thought some of you might like this for your ping lists. I don't know if it would fit all of yours because I'm not familiar with all of them but IMO, this should be seen. This is America, not Saudi Arabia. This is what he's swearing on to be a representative of the people of the United States? It's outrageous.
16 posted on 12/03/2006 7:45:22 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: senna

Does anyone have a link to the "complete" Quran senna is talking about? I never knew until today that there's an expurgated version floating around for making nice-nice with Americans.


17 posted on 12/03/2006 7:47:14 AM PST by Silly (Still being... Silly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JessieHelmsJr

That is my point if I was in a Muslim country I wouldn't be allowed to use the BIBLE at a swearing "Getting elected would never happen anyway"

What bothers me is that he wants to go against the grain and this to me sets a very negative presendent. This our country and I am tired of the "We don't want to offend anyone" attitude...To go against what we have used for 238 years is not what the process is all about in my eyes.


18 posted on 12/03/2006 7:47:58 AM PST by senna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Silly
I never knew until today that there's an expurgated version floating around for making nice-nice with Americans.

Sure wouldn't surprise me since they are permitted by their religion/god/ whatever to lie to infidels if it furthers the cause of islam. That would include deceiving the world about what it really syas, too.

19 posted on 12/03/2006 7:49:08 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Yeah, I shouldn't have been surprised, but I was.

I will start searching Amazon to find this version. If I find something that looks like the ticket, I'll post it.


20 posted on 12/03/2006 7:50:38 AM PST by Silly (Still being... Silly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson