Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC: Bush seeks advice on Iraq policy ~ actually ,,,having consultations with State Department ...
BBC ^ | Monday, 11 December 2006, 19:40 GMT | BBC Staff

Posted on 12/11/2006 12:27:09 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Bush seeks advice on Iraq policy

President Bush

Mr Bush is to make a televised address on Iraq before Christmas

US President George W Bush has opened three days of intensive talks on Iraq, as he weighs possible policy changes.

Without mentioning Iran and Syria by name, Mr Bush said Iraq's neighbours also bore responsibility for helping foster Iraqi security and democracy.

His comments came after consultations with senior State Department officials.

The talks follow a recent report on US policy in Iraq that called for urgent action to stop "a slide towards chaos", including talks with Iran and Syria.

The high-level report by the Iraq Study Group (ISG) published last week said the current US strategy of staying the course was no longer viable.

The 142-page report included 79 recommendations.

It offered no hard timetable for a pullout of US forces, but said combat troops could withdraw by early 2008.

'Foundation for peace'

Following a State Department briefing on Monday, Mr Bush spoke of the responsibilities of neighbouring countries to help Iraqis, although he avoided mentioning Iran and Syria by name.

Iraq man examines house destroyed in US raid on Ramadi
US firepower has failed to end the insurgency in Iraq

"Success in Iraq will help protect the United States in the long run.

"We believe that most of the countries understand that a mainstream society, a society that is a functioning democracy is in their interests and it is up to us to help focus their attentions and focus their efforts on helping Iraqis succeed," he said.

He defined success in Iraq as "a country that governs, defends itself, that is a free society, that serves as an ally in this war on terror".

The BBC's James Coomarasamy in Washington says Mr Bush appeared to signal a subtle change in his language, referring to Iraq not as the central front in the war on terror, but as a component part, if an important one, of laying the foundation for peace.

Although the significance in policy terms is not immediately clear, the wording echoes that used by new Defence Secretary Robert Gates and suggests that the Bush administration may be about to recast the US mission in Iraq, our correspondent says.




TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqstudygroup; iraqsurrendergroup; surrendergroup

1 posted on 12/11/2006 12:27:14 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

"His comments came after consultations with senior State Department officials."

He really needs to stop consulting the enemy and turn instead to what Americans have been telling him...hehehehe


2 posted on 12/11/2006 12:30:52 PM PST by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Yeah, that'll help. "US firepower" hasn't ended the "insurgency" because it really hasn't been used. Thanks to the State Department, no doubt...


3 posted on 12/11/2006 12:39:38 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I heard on Fox that the stop at the State Dept first was perhaps 'symbolic' of changes in his approach.

I laughed.

He will continue to rely on his military advisors as he has from the beginning.

4 posted on 12/11/2006 12:45:20 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
He defined success in Iraq as "a country that governs, defends itself, that is a free society, that serves as an ally in this war on terror".

I no longer think this is possible.

5 posted on 12/11/2006 12:47:25 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Praise the Lord that our Commander in Chief and his troops aren't such pessimists.

They'll get the job done.

6 posted on 12/11/2006 12:51:24 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We should definitively "talk" with Syria and Iran.

Tell them to stop supporting terrorism or else get carpet bombed.

Give them a month to comply.

That should make the ISG happy...
7 posted on 12/11/2006 1:11:12 PM PST by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Agree 100%, and the polite gentleman that he is, the President will rebuff the State Department and the Iraq Surrender Group in his usual “gentleman” way.


8 posted on 12/11/2006 1:29:06 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Actually, Condi has thrown a huge wet blanket over Baker's urge to go hat in hand to the Syrians. It is noteworthy that Cheney went with Bush to the State Department to meet with Rice today. That was designed to show unity of approach. Methinks there is much more of a meeting of minds between Cheney and Rice than is generally supposed.

Next step: dealing with the Boy President.

Be Seeing You,

Chris


9 posted on 12/11/2006 1:32:05 PM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Some folks mistake his "gentleman" way for weakness or lack of resolve.

He will politely acknowledge their efforts and proceed to do the right thing anyway, undeterred.

10 posted on 12/11/2006 1:33:41 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: section9
dealing with the Boy President.

What does that mean?

11 posted on 12/11/2006 1:47:50 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: section9
Next step: dealing with the Boy President.

What do you mean Chris?

12 posted on 12/11/2006 1:52:01 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: section9

I'll third that..........what do you mean?


13 posted on 12/11/2006 1:53:12 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I think he means Assad.


14 posted on 12/11/2006 1:54:56 PM PST by AmishDude (I coined "Senator Ass" to describe Jim Webb. He may have already used it as a character in a novel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Listen very closely to the words of BenLurkin, post #7. By gosh, I think he has the answer.


15 posted on 12/11/2006 2:42:37 PM PST by Colonel PK (Say what you will, I don't have to agree with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson