For Jimmy Carter to say such a thing, he must now either be senile, an ignorant fool or completely amoral.
Posted on 12/21/2006 5:24:44 AM PST by cloud8
"Why won't Carter debate his book?"
My answer: He didn't really write it. I think he added a few lines and a few personal stories, but for the most part, it was researched and written by others. That's why he can't defend it.
Carter's presidential legacy is muted irrelevance, and he's desperate to leave some trace of his passing. The fact is, he's such a lightweight he couldn't leave a footprint in a snow storm.
"When a homo-infested commie rag like Slate calls your work moronic,you have to know the jig is up."
Either that or you are a conservative.
IIRC, he was also the one on the OJ Dream Team that threw the race card into the mix.
For Jimmy Carter to say such a thing, he must now either be senile, an ignorant fool or completely amoral.
I'm sure you two are right. It's almost certainly a ghost-written tome, based on a couple of interviews and phone confabs with Carter, his published speeches, and some ghost-writer input. He probably hasn't even read it.
ROFL!!!
LOL
****
There's a thought! Who would you most like to see debate Jimmah over his book??
Our Anne (Coulter) would be my top pick from a strict entertainment point.
For a serious debate, David Horowitz would be another really entertaining debater considering the subject matter...
For a Moderator, I'd settle for Rush...but for sheer entertainment value, we would need to have a good Producer for the the debates who can arrange for a wild rabbit to run across the stage every time Carter goes to open his peanut-hole to say anything...
Brang it on!!
> I have noticed that since 9/11, Dershowitz seems to have come to the realization that as a jew his, personal, neck is on the line now, thanks to the terrorists, and as a result he has changed his tune on a number of issues relating to national security.
Ed Koch appears to have come to this realization, too.
I was amazed at the severity of Dershowitz's tone, at the Boston Globe for publishing the piece, and that Larry King asked the old fool a tough question.
As for Carter, maybe, just maybe he'll get the point that his being a Nobelist ex-President does not entitle him to shoot his mouth off without being held accountable. I love that he is being denounced by all sides, but it would be too much to hope that the ridicule and jeers would drive him into retirement.
Aha! So Jimmie is also light in the loafers?
High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel, WOT
..................
Ralphie the alter ego of Jean Shepherd. The double dog dare Daisy air rifle kid.
But,...I bet my wife a kiss that someone would post a Kramden pic.
We both won. :~)
My impression is that to many Jews, liberalism is Torah, or their substitute for it.
He probably figures that, since he's not the original author of much of it, why bother debating.
Yeh, but I bet Alan voted for him. Twice.
Every head full of mush crumb cruncher has to defend his/her thesis....why not the former president of the United States?
Einstein had to defend his work, is Jimmy smarter than that?
But hold on....Jimmy lost a debate to a giant rabbit.
The Lord was watching over us.
****
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.