Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Democrats Become Part of the Problem? (Paul is a moron barf alert)
NewsMax.com ^ | Nov. 10, 2006 | Paul Craig Roberts

Posted on 12/21/2006 8:30:32 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot

It only took six years for Americans to comprehend George Bush and the Republican Party and to realize that the Republicans were not leading America in any promising directions.

Exit polls and interviews with voters across the country by CNN political analyst Bill Schneider show that the November 2006 election was a vote against both Bush and the war in Iraq. Schneider reports that voters did not even know the name of the Democrats for whom they voted. Voters said: "I am going to vote Democrat because I don't like Bush, I don't like the war. I want to make a statement."

I believe that voters recognized that the peril of one-party rule is that political accountability exists nowhere except at the ballot box. With the Republican built and programmed electronic voting machines, even accountability at the ballot box was disappearing. Americans realized that they had made a serious mistake giving power to one party, and they rectified it.

With Republican control of the legislative branch ended, Pentagon Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was immediately swept from power. With the troops, generals and the service newspapers calling for Rumsfeld's head, only the delusional warmonger, Vice President Richard Cheney, wanted to keep Rumsfeld in power.

It was a battle that Cheney lost. Cheney's defeat is an indication that reality has elbowed its way back into Republican consciousness, pushing hubris and delusion away from the control they have exercised over political power.

The lust for unbridled power proved to be too strong a temptation for normally cautious Republicans. The Republicans waved the flag and shouted, "Terrorist sympathizer," at every civil libertarian who attempted to defend the U.S. Constitution, the separation of powers, the Bill of Rights, the Geneva Conventions' proscriptions against torture and America's reputation from a Nazified U.S. Dept of Justice (sic) and a president who behaved - with the approval of Republicans - as if he were above the law. In violation of his oath of office, Bush used signing statements to negate laws passed by Congress -- not with a veto, but with his personal opinion. Bush thus elevated himself above the rule of law that has protected America from becoming a tyranny and made a mockery of the separation of powers that are a foundation of American liberty.

Americans may not have understood this as clearly as the Founding Fathers did, but the people recognized, however dimly, a problem and exercised corrective action. The question now is: What will the Democrats do?

The Democrats clearly have no mandate for their pet issues of gun control, homosexual marriage and higher taxes -- especially at a time when the average American is deeper in personal debt than at any other time in history and jobs are being offshored at a rapid rate, destroying the economic prospects of the American people.

After the years of illegal war and the overnight destruction of civil liberties that were 800 years in their creation, the United States stands at a watershed. If the legislation that has been put on the books permitting spying on Americans without a court warrant, legalizing torture and self-incrimination, and repealing habeas corpus and the right to an attorney remains on the books, the United States will be a police state regardless of which party is in power.

If the Democrats are to make a real difference, their first task is to repeal the Orwellian-named "PATRIOT Acts," the torture legislation, the detention without court evidence legislation, and the right to spy and invade privacy without court warrant legislation. The White House tyrant needs to be quickly told that one more "signing statement" and he will be impeached, convicted and turned over to the War Crimes Tribunal at the Hague.

The notion that Americans can be protected from "terror" by giving up the Bill of Rights is absurd. Democrats are complicit in this absurd notion. Many were intimidated into voting for police state legislation because they lacked the intestinal fortitude to call police state legislation by its own name. The legislation that has been passed during the Bush regime is far more dangerous to Americans than Muslim terrorists.

Indeed, the prime cause of Muslim terrorism is the U.S. interference in the internal affairs of Muslim countries and America's one-sided stance in favor of Israel in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. When Jimmy Carter was president, his even-handed approach made the United States respected throughout the Muslim world. Sept. 11, if it was actually an act of Muslim terrorism, was the direct consequence of U.S. one-sided meddling in Middle Eastern affairs.

When, and only when, the Democrats have erased the Bush administration's police state legislation from the books, thus restoring the Constitution, they should clear the air on two other issues of major importance. The Democrats must convene a commission of independent experts to investigate 9-11. The 9-11 commission report has too many problems and shortcomings to be believable.

Recent polls show that 36 percent of the American people do not believe the report. Such a deficient report is unacceptable. Sept. 11 became the excuse for the neoconservative Bush regime to launch illegal wars of aggression in the Middle East. The 9-11 commission report is nothing but a public relations justification for the "war on terror," which in truth is a war on American liberty. As long as politicians with a police state mentality can cling to the cover of the 9-11 commission report, the Bill of Rights will remain endangered.

The other issue is the blatant corruption in the Bush regime's contract practices. So many contracts are tainted with their connections to Republican power brokers, including Vice President Richard Cheney, that the taxpayers are being fleeced on the level of the Grant administration. Indictments and long prison sentences are in order.

This leaves the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Both are lost. Both invasions were illegal. Those responsible must be held accountable. The American prosecutors of the Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg emphasized, as Robert Jackson put it, that Germany's crime was not in losing the war but in starting it. Under the Nuremberg standard, to launch a war of aggression is a war crime. It is punishable with a death sentence.

As the wars are crimes, they must be stopped. Having overthrown a stable secular regime in Iraq, the United States and its craven allies have no recourse but to accept that Iraq will break into three states: In the north, the Kurds will unite with the Turkish Kurds, and Turkey will have to deal with the situation without U.S. interference. In the south, the Shiites will have an Islamic regime similar to the government in Iran, with whom the Iraqi Shiites will be allied. The Sunnis will be isolated in the middle without any oil.

The United States and Britain no longer have any role to play in the Middle East. As the King of Jordan predicted, there is now a Shiite crescent that runs from Iran through Iraq into Lebanon. This Shiite crescent is the most powerful force in the Middle East.

The Iraqi Sunnis can come to terms with Shiite power or be destroyed. The American puppet states of Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the oil emirates are faced with the instability that comes from being allied with the "hegemonic" West against their own people. It is up to their own wits whether they can make the transformation. The United States has neither the resources, the finances nor the credibility to intervene.

The Israelis have isolated themselves with their genocidal policies against the Palestinians. Intelligent Israelis are already sending their children out of the country. Israeli peace groups have thrown up their hands in the face of the persistent intransigence of the Israeli government and the disregard of common sense.

It remains to be seen if the Israelis can learn to care about anyone but their own kind. Israel can save itself if its political leaders will stop pushing Palestinians off of their own land by destroying their homes and orchards and murdering their children, thus turning more Palestinians into refugees. It would be easy for the economically talented Israelis to pull the Palestinians into prosperity, thereby ending the conflict. Are Israelis capable of the humane leadership required to create a place for themselves in the Middle East, or are they forever wed to Mao's dictum that "power comes out of the barrel of a gun"?

Republican rule in the 21st century has devastated American civil liberties and American prestige and leadership capability. Can Democrats restore American liberties and leadership, or will a lust for power corrupt them, too, and cause Democrats to retain the police state powers Bush has created?

If the Bush regime's police state legislation is still law in 2008, the Democrats will have failed.

COPYRIGHT 2006 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: assclown; paulcraigroberts; pcr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Someone, please, up his meds!!!
1 posted on 12/21/2006 8:30:35 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: monday

Check out this one.


2 posted on 12/21/2006 8:31:18 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Head case alert.


3 posted on 12/21/2006 8:34:27 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
I believe that voters recognized that the peril of one-party rule is that political accountability exists nowhere except at the ballot box

Wow...they win ONE ( & a midterm at that) election in a decade & everythings changed?

4 posted on 12/21/2006 8:34:39 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

C'mon, Toddster! It's Christmas! Give the fruitcake a break!


5 posted on 12/21/2006 8:56:53 AM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
With the Republican built and programmed electronic voting machines, even accountability at the ballot box was disappearing. Americans realized that they had made a serious mistake giving power to one party, and they rectified it.

...who did you say "rectified" those Republican voting machines?

6 posted on 12/21/2006 9:01:34 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Fake but Accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I remember in the days of The Conservative Chronicle that this guy used to be a good read on economic issues. I’ve never seen a rational person seem to go insane in print so thoroughly. If I were a family member of his, I would desperately be trying to get him to a neurologist. The extreme paranoia and delusions he obviously is suffering from may be medical. What, other than a tumor, could explain such dementia?


7 posted on 12/21/2006 9:16:18 AM PST by Minn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minn

Part of the problem THEY ARE THE PROBLEM


8 posted on 12/21/2006 9:23:53 AM PST by stickandpucknut (Go Dallas Stars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
"Exit polls and interviews with voters across the country "

Santa Clause would have the same poll numbers if he received the same press coverage.

9 posted on 12/21/2006 9:25:51 AM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stickandpucknut

Paul, Craig, and Roberts, apparently all three of the are looney tunes.

"When Jimmy Carter was president, his even-handed approach made the United States respected throughout the Muslim world"...Level 1

" Sept. 11, if it was actually an act of Muslim terrorism,"
...Level 2

" was the direct consequence of U.S. one-sided meddling in Middle Eastern affairs. "...Level 3, Oh yeah these guys need seperate floors in the Cuckoos nest.


10 posted on 12/21/2006 9:28:51 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Thank you for NOT excerpting this article.

Methinks Mr. Roberts needs a vacation.


11 posted on 12/21/2006 9:31:35 AM PST by upchuck (How to win the WOT? Simple: set our rules of engagement to at least match those of our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

People actually pay for this drivel. Where's mine I can write almost as incorrectly and untruthfully as this fool?


12 posted on 12/21/2006 9:33:13 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

OMG, this is a hoax, right?


13 posted on 12/21/2006 9:33:14 AM PST by McGavin999 (Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Don't you know Paul used to serve in the Reagan administration?


14 posted on 12/21/2006 9:49:33 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
When Jimmy Carter was president, his even-handed approach made the United States respected throughout the Muslim world.


It's a good thing that this is a printed article...nobody could say that with a straight face...or without getting struck by lightening.
15 posted on 12/21/2006 9:59:31 AM PST by crazyhorse691 (The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

What the hell do u mean IF it was muslims.STOP SMOKING CRACK


16 posted on 12/21/2006 10:20:26 AM PST by stickandpucknut (Go Dallas Stars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Paul Craig Roberts:
The lust for unbridled power proved to be too strong a temptation for normally cautious Republicans. The Republicans waved the flag and shouted, "Terrorist sympathizer," at every civil libertarian who attempted to defend the U.S. Constitution, the separation of powers, the Bill of Rights, the Geneva Conventions' proscriptions against torture and America's reputation from a Nazified U.S. Dept of Justice (sic) and a president who behaved - with the approval of Republicans - as if he were above the law. In violation of his oath of office, Bush used signing statements to negate laws passed by Congress -- not with a veto, but with his personal opinion. Bush thus elevated himself above the rule of law that has protected America from becoming a tyranny and made a mockery of the separation of powers that are a foundation of American liberty.




This guy is freakin loony toons (medical term). Someone better call the nuthouse - STAT!!

And please keep all sharp objects away from him.

(I wonder what his DU screen name is??)

17 posted on 12/21/2006 10:43:10 AM PST by Condor51 (Tagline Under Construction - Kindly Wear Your Hardhat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
...only the delusional warmonger, Vice President Richard Cheney...

I wish Pres Bush would resign today.... which of course, would leave "...the delusional warmonger, Vice President Richard Cheney" commander in chief.

This probably would drive the left over the edge...and

...it would be so much fun to watch.

18 posted on 12/21/2006 10:52:51 AM PST by B.O. Plenty (liberalism, abortions and islam are terminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stickandpucknut

You've been hit one to many times with a hockey puck.

The quotes mean I am quoting the article by PCRoberts lol.


19 posted on 12/21/2006 11:39:25 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

If this guy is a civil libertarian, why does he sound like a typical socialist Europe lover and Muslim appeaser?


20 posted on 12/21/2006 11:44:54 AM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson