Skip to comments.
Hillary Hires Evangelical Consultant
NewsMax ^
| Dec 26, 2006
| Staff
Posted on 12/26/2006 9:39:30 AM PST by jdm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-115 next last
To: jdm
Free advice - don't look at a cross, or try to hold a Bible without a glove
61
posted on
12/26/2006 10:43:37 AM PST
by
freedomlover
(Sorry, a tagline occurred. The tagline has been logged.)
To: LexBaird; All
Better beard than Gore
Whinier and more irritating voice.
Gore has bigger belly and bust.
Hillary has thicker thighs and lousier hair.
Gore is more single minded.
Hillary is colder. (due to Global warming, but NOT at her house)
Gore is taller.
Hillary can throw an outdoor party at Fort Marcy Park that has a more potent punch.
Gore can kiss longer.
Hillary says depends on the girl. Gore doesn't like snippy Hillary uses tin snips,........and has bigger HIPS!!!!
62
posted on
12/26/2006 10:44:15 AM PST
by
Gideon Reader
(ALL of my weapons are cleaned, my mags are loaded, and my music is very, VERY cool.)
To: jdm
Some one who is evangelical about consultancy?
Well, if you truly believe in it...
63
posted on
12/26/2006 10:44:20 AM PST
by
AmishDude
(It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
To: jdm
How close to the election will she begin to wear her cross necklace again?
I'm surprised that this necklace doesn't burn her skin.
64
posted on
12/26/2006 10:44:37 AM PST
by
bannie
To: bannie
I'm surprised that her skin does'nt burn the cross.
65
posted on
12/26/2006 10:47:41 AM PST
by
Gideon Reader
(ALL of my weapons are cleaned, my mags are loaded, and my music is very, VERY cool.)
To: CodeMasterPhilzar
She really shouldn't make it this easy to reject her as ever having a hope of being my choice for, well, anything...
LOL!! Thanks for making my point better and more succinctly than I.
66
posted on
12/26/2006 10:49:12 AM PST
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Gideon Reader
haha. Titanium?
67
posted on
12/26/2006 10:49:33 AM PST
by
bannie
To: silverleaf
Me thinks Natasha Fatale needs some purposeful face time with Rick Warren.
68
posted on
12/26/2006 10:52:39 AM PST
by
dgallo51
(DEMAND IMMEDIATE, OPEN INVESTIGATIONS OF U.S. COMPLICITY IN RWANDAN GENOCIDE!)
To: DustyMoment
This is a smart move by Hillary. It won't cost her any votes with her base and it will end up swinging from the GOP candidate. It won't be enough to swing a state like Georgia or Mississippi but it might in a state like Florida or Ohio. She only needs one of those two states and she's in.
To: jdm
Vanderslice herself didnt become an evangelical Christian until she attended Earlham College, a Quaker school in Indiana known for its adherence to pacifism. She acknowledges that she still struggles with common evangelical ideas about abortion, homosexuality, and the literal reading of Scripture, according to the Times.In other words, she doesn't believe in the Bible or in Biblical teachings. She is NOT an evangelical, but she sounds like the perfect Christian outreach person for Hillary. Unfortunately, they will be able to fool many people who get their views from the MSM.
70
posted on
12/26/2006 10:58:23 AM PST
by
DeweyCA
To: Graybeard58
No, I don't think it will work.
To: Zack Nguyen
A real Christian would not need a consultant on Christianity.
72
posted on
12/26/2006 11:00:16 AM PST
by
tenn2005
(Birth is merely an event; it is the path walked that becomes one's life.)
To: jdm
The sad thing is that you have to HIRE someone to help you. It should come naturally if it is genuine!
To: jdm
Attention Peggy Noonan:
Will you write a piece about Hillary declaring "too much God"? You know, like the one you wrote about President Bush?
74
posted on
12/26/2006 11:02:20 AM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: Liberty Valance
It is strainge to me that all the Rats who support abortion, the homosexual agenda, and same sex marriage are now claiming to be Christians who support abortion, the homosexual agenda and same sex marriage. Who do they think they are fooling by trying to have it both ways?
75
posted on
12/26/2006 11:05:51 AM PST
by
tenn2005
(Birth is merely an event; it is the path walked that becomes one's life.)
To: DustyMoment
"Why am I not surprised that she would have to hire a consultant on Christianity!!?? "Didn't she claim at one time (when Slick Willie was running) that she had Jewish roots?
76
posted on
12/26/2006 11:08:13 AM PST
by
albee
(The best thing you can do for the poor is.....not be one of them. - Eric Hoffer)
To: jdm
As Rush might phrase it. Hillary is training to be" A Phony baloney, plastic banana, good time rock and roll faux evangelical".
77
posted on
12/26/2006 11:08:45 AM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
( Kerry, Graham and Dodd. The three amigo's........ of the terrorists.)
To: JeffAtlanta
I agree about civil liberties and fiscal conservatism being the keys to success. Yeah the move to socialism has really hurt...but it's so seductive for politicians to promise people to help with their health care payments, help with paying for college, more money for social security, etc, etc. Compassionate Conservative I believe WAS a necessary strategery to win in 2000 during the last nanny-state "recession". Of course it grew out of control and turned into vote buying for various reasons (some good like funding the war, some shameful like set asides).
Abortion and gay marriage are two of the really big issues that many so called "real" conservatives (social conservatives, paleoconservatives) draw a line in the sand over with respect to the current GOP poll leaders. I think if handled poorly these are loser issues. The issue should be judicial legislation not the right or wrong of abortion and gay marriage but few have kept the focus on the WAY these things were made legal.
I wouldn't argue that I'd vote for the GOP no matter what but I'm sorry to say that probably will happen the way things are shaping up. There's no way I'm voting for Hillary, Obama, Edwards or any of the other Democrats and voting 3rd party would just be too selfish on my part and just result in a Democratic victory. I understand the strategy argument of hanging tough against the GOP but I just don't see them being bluffed into nominating....whom?
78
posted on
12/26/2006 11:13:36 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: TommyDale
All she has to do is fool Republicans into nominating Rudy Giuliani or John McCain. Absolutely true!
79
posted on
12/26/2006 11:14:50 AM PST
by
kcvl
To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
80
posted on
12/26/2006 11:14:52 AM PST
by
leftover
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-115 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson