Skip to comments.
Missouri Man Reels In Ancient FishHook (300-12,000 Years Old)
Kansas City Star ^
| 1-2-2007
| AP
Posted on 01/02/2007 3:24:53 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: facedown
Dang, you would have to scalp an entire tribe of cavewomen to get enough hair to weave into a 1000 yard, 20 lb. test line!
21
posted on
01/02/2007 4:10:16 PM PST
by
Hatteras
To: BallyBill
Paraphrasing Crocodile Dundee, "Now that's a hook."
22
posted on
01/02/2007 4:10:16 PM PST
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: Tinian
Public land is your property? Right. He looted a grave? Right.
And what pray tell would you have him do? Or any other person that finds artifacts on "your property"?
I'll bet he'll probably donate the artifact.
23
posted on
01/02/2007 4:12:09 PM PST
by
swmobuffalo
(The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
To: blam
And when he told his buddies one of them said: "That's nothing, I once caught a fishhook this big!"
24
posted on
01/02/2007 4:14:16 PM PST
by
mrsmith
To: swmobuffalo
And what pray tell would you have him do? He should have reported his find to the Army Corps of Engineers, so they could bring in bulldozers to bury the gravel bar.
25
posted on
01/02/2007 4:16:52 PM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
To: blam
26
posted on
01/02/2007 4:18:28 PM PST
by
jsh3180
To: Tinian
WOW idiot post of the day. Go back to your focus group!
27
posted on
01/02/2007 4:18:47 PM PST
by
packrat35
(guest worker/day worker=SlaveMart)
To: Tinian
You have a point. Private citizens have no rights on public land except what the Public Agency grants by permit.
To: swmobuffalo
Tinian is a bit over the top in his presentation, but he does have a point. If Henley found this hook on public land, it isn't his. Artifacts found in the US generally belong to the landowner. If the landowner in this case is the state or federal government, Henley has no right to keep or sell it. He may have no CHOICE but to donate the artifact.
If he was on private land and had permission from the landowner to be there, then he has himself a nice (and likely valuable) artifact. If it was public land, it needs to be turned over to whatever agency manages the land.
To: Cold Heart
Oh yeah, like that "eminant domain"???
To: Tinian
Walking along a river and picking up items is considered grave robbing? I used to hunt arrow heads in New Jersey and some New England states. I walked through plowed up corn fields in the Fall. I never considered it grave robbing. What a stupid statement!
31
posted on
01/02/2007 4:26:36 PM PST
by
4yearlurker
("Nothing is true,and everything is permitted"--7 th Satanic vow. Sounds like Liberalism!)
To: Hatteras
Dang, you would have to scalp an entire tribe of cavewomen to get enough hair to weave into a 1000 yard, 20 lb. test line!Yeah, but the bronze leader was the real trick.
32
posted on
01/02/2007 4:28:39 PM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Tinian
I agree, why I hope the thought police go after him and his boys for even thinking of looking for artifacts. I think a proper hanging is in order
33
posted on
01/02/2007 4:31:38 PM PST
by
Luigi Vasellini
(What do you call 2 toddlers and some duct tape??........muslim body armor!!!!!!!)
To: ndt
Doesn't matter. On another thread we just found out the Universe is older than thought.
34
posted on
01/02/2007 4:32:09 PM PST
by
fish hawk
(. B O stinks. That would be body odor and Barak Obama)
To: Arthalion
If the landowner in this case is the state or federal government, Henley has no right to keep or sell it. Protection of antiquities on federal lands started with the Antiquities Act of 1906.
Almost all (or all?) states have similar laws pertaining to public property.
35
posted on
01/02/2007 4:33:09 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Luigi Vasellini
Two Americas, right ? The Americans who came via the landbridge and others who came by boat...
To: blam
(300-12,000 Years Old)Sorry, but even if it were Adam's hook (which is quite unlikely), it could of been 6,600 years old at the most!
37
posted on
01/02/2007 4:36:40 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(We all need someone we can bleed on...)
To: Tinian
...You cannot steal our heritage from our property for your shoebox...Prove it's yours.
38
posted on
01/02/2007 4:39:26 PM PST
by
FReepaholic
(Give me ambiguity or give me something else.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
The Americans who came via the landbridge and others who came by boat... This is actually pretty well established on the west coast.
There is good mtDNA evidence and several other lines of research that support an early coastal migration. This is called by some "following the kelp highway."
39
posted on
01/02/2007 4:39:31 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Tinian
A man hunting for American Indian artifacts with his sons along a gravel bar on the Missouri River has uncovered an ancient fishhook Fine for finding a bone hook on a gravel bar on the Missouri River? You would put him in jail for that? You must be nuts.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson