Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The US Government’s Secret Colorado Oil Discovery
rinf.com ^ | May 1, 2006 | David Ray Griffin

Posted on 01/02/2007 10:21:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains lies the largest untapped oil reserve in the world - more than 2 TRILLION barrels. On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction. Three companies have been chosen to lead the way. Test drilling has already begun

Dear Reader,

Five months ago, the U.S. Energy Department announced the results of a land survey

It was conducted to determine the official amount of oil a thousand feet deep in the Rocky Mountains

They reported this stunning news:

We have more oil inside our borders, than all the other proven reserves on earth.

Here are the official estimates:

* 8-times as much oil as Saudi Arabia * 18-times as much oil as Iraq * 21-times as much oil as Kuwait * 22-times as much oil as Iran * 500-times as much oil as Yemen

And it’s all right here in the Western United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at rinf.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bigoil; energy; middleeast; oil; oilsands; oilshale; orrinhatch; petroleum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Anyone know anything about this? Is it even 50% true?
1 posted on 01/02/2007 10:21:42 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sounds like kookery to me. From their website:

Resistance Is Not Futile? Well.. it's media Jim, but not as we know it.

And it's not science fiction.

RINF is an independent source for under reported news from around the world, which is updated on a full-time basis by one person, Michael Meaney.

2 posted on 01/02/2007 10:24:50 PM PST by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think you are right.!!!


3 posted on 01/02/2007 10:25:38 PM PST by GitmoSailor (...COLD WAR VET...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Old news, but good news. Yes, it's true.


4 posted on 01/02/2007 10:26:04 PM PST by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

tin foil hat stuff


5 posted on 01/02/2007 10:26:45 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
is updated on a full-time basis by one person, Michael Meaney.

Fortunately, he can devote himself fulltime to getting the news out, what with his mom being so cool about letting him live at home. :)
6 posted on 01/02/2007 10:26:57 PM PST by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is similar to the oil sands in Canada which is being developed on a monstrous scale. This has made Canada the #1 crude supplier to the U.S., all within the last 5 to 10 years. The u.s. oil shale supplies are well known.


7 posted on 01/02/2007 10:30:08 PM PST by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I sense a zot, but I'll bite.

The fact is, there is a lot of shale oil in Rocky Mountains. This has been known for decades. However, it's much more expensive to extract than the usual oil supply. In particular, there are huge start-up costs.

If I recall correctly, at current prices, it's close to profitable to extract it. But if the prices go down (which any ME country could do by increasing supply) the whole process becomes a money-loser and there's no way to recover it.

There is no conspiracy.

I'd advise that you avoid such poorly-written articles in general and this website in particular.

There's no conspiracy or secret.


8 posted on 01/02/2007 10:30:38 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is supposedly just one of several.

I read a book 30 years or so ago about how during Ike's Presidency the decision was made to keep secret lots of heavy duty deposits--and to not use them until the rest of the world ran out of oil.

I don't doubt that something like this could be true. Whether it is or not remains to be seen. And why are the puppet masters allowing it out, now. To forestall the zero-point energy technologies from being outted?

We shall see.


9 posted on 01/02/2007 10:32:41 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head

Is it really true? Do you have other sources? I guess it'S realistic and imaginable, but this would be HUGE news!
I can imagine all those Enviro-loonies clamoring, there will be no more oil in future...Lol! Even without this (apparent) Jumbo-Oilfield, we can cover our needs and even export by Oil-shale.
We should jump off the Arabs oil and let them slip into irrelevance.


10 posted on 01/02/2007 10:32:51 PM PST by SolidWood (Sadr lives. Kill him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Google Search revealed the following report done by Rand group which should make everyone cautious about this overzealous report from Stansberry. They say at least 20 years to get 1,000,000 bbls/day. Much of what Stansberry quotes is lifted from the report. Its Oil Shale Oil, needing 3 barrels of water to extract one barrel of oil. That's a lot of water for out West.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9143/index1.html

11 posted on 01/02/2007 10:38:32 PM PST by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

????????


12 posted on 01/02/2007 10:39:02 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Oil Shale

The above link may help.

13 posted on 01/02/2007 10:46:28 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Head

There has been a oil find in central Utah that is estimated at 200 million to as high as 1 billion barrels recently:

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,600131526,00.html

There is oil in the western US. The reason why it hasn't been found, much less exploited is that the drilling depths are much deeper than in previous finds, and the exploration costs much more. That, and the USGS models of geology in Utah, Nevada, western CO, etc are simply wrong.

There are oil wells here in Nevada in the Railroad Valley that were good finds in their day. There is oil here in western intermountain states, it is just that the geology isn't operating according to West Texas models. This means that oil exploration companies need to have deep, deep pockets to develop new (and accurate) geological models, seismic surveys, do exploratory drilling, etc, etc.

There is plenty of oil in the CONUS area. We just have to quit listening to the environmentalist twaddle, pablum and dogma against drilling.


14 posted on 01/02/2007 10:46:40 PM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spyone
This is similar to the oil sands in Canada which is being developed on a monstrous scale.

There is a huge difference between tar sands and shale oil. The tar sands have been in development stages for 10-15 years and only recently has the production of oil from tar sands become cost effective. The time and dollars spent to refine the process have been huge.

Shale oil on the other hand represents a huge potential, as the oil is there. However, at this time the refining method or I should say the most cost effective extraction method is still to be developed.

15 posted on 01/02/2007 11:57:28 PM PST by Michael.SF. (It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Quix
during Ike's Presidency the decision was made to keep secret lots of heavy duty deposits--and to not use them until the rest of the world ran out of oil.

That has a bit of a 'tin foil hat' ring to it. How about this alternate wording:

not to use them until "the cost of oil had risen to such a level that they could justify the much higher extraction costs"

We are nearing or at that point today, as witness the developments in Alberta. I would guess we are 5-10 years away from serious development in shale oil extraction.

16 posted on 01/03/2007 12:02:39 AM PST by Michael.SF. (It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is this a cue strange music type of thread?


17 posted on 01/03/2007 2:49:05 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( For the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
any Middle East (southwestern Asian) country with large oil reserves and Venezuela, Nigeria, and even the UK and Norway. (though their reserves are apparently running dry).
18 posted on 01/03/2007 2:51:58 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( For the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Extract costs are very high, but at least some of it can be extracted for less than $60/bbl and a lot less than the cost of the Seventh Fleet.


19 posted on 01/03/2007 2:53:22 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The artist doesn't have to have all the answers; he must, however, ask the right questions honestly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

1 billion barrels is a mere .05% of the 2 trillion barrels that the article suggests.


20 posted on 01/03/2007 2:53:44 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( For the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson