Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/08/2007 2:57:32 PM PST by chartnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: chartnah

2 posted on 01/08/2007 2:59:44 PM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

Duncan Hunter.


3 posted on 01/08/2007 2:59:53 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast ([Hunter/Rumsfeld 2008!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

Actually, Morris nails it, though in a condescending way.

"Conservatives may think they are going to vote for Rudy, McCain, Newt or Romney - but wait until the negative ads start running."


4 posted on 01/08/2007 3:01:39 PM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

Wanted: Conservative for President

Qualifications: Happy marriage, heterosexual, pro family, pro life, pro fiscal responsibility, pro 2nd amendment, anti illegal immigration.

Disqualifications: Messy divorces, men who cheat on their wives, gun grabbers, abortion freaks, open border whores, borrow and spend RINOism, and Bobby Has Two Daddies supporters.


5 posted on 01/08/2007 3:04:33 PM PST by UWconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

Considering the choices we've been seeing, Newt is a write-in.


8 posted on 01/08/2007 3:07:58 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah
So just what is Morris anyway? Conservative? Leftist? Strategist for hire? I've never been able to tell.

BTW, we've got Tancredo, Hunter and Cox.

9 posted on 01/08/2007 3:08:29 PM PST by Tim Long (Pardon Ramos and Compean. January 17 is approaching fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

Maybe no one can figure out what a Republican should be.

I'm a CINR [Conservative is not Republican], I'm looking for someone who has been right about what is good for America in foreign policy and trade.

So far I'll write in Buchanan.


15 posted on 01/08/2007 3:10:28 PM PST by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

How about let's go for a wild ride . . .

Laz for Prez.

THAT would REALLY shakeup the status quo! LOL!


17 posted on 01/08/2007 3:11:30 PM PST by Petruchio (* Censored *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

FR is irrelevent for the 08 election cycle; itll be a litany of whining about the lack of true believers running.


18 posted on 01/08/2007 3:11:41 PM PST by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

Dick Morris wants the most unelectable Republican possible.

He is a Clinton loyalist, always and forever.


20 posted on 01/08/2007 3:14:05 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Victoria Delsoul

"Pass the popcorn and check out this thread" ping.


21 posted on 01/08/2007 3:14:07 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

Duncan Hunter


22 posted on 01/08/2007 3:14:44 PM PST by bluetone006 (Peace - or I guess war if given no other option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

One problem is that the social conservatives control the votes, but the country club Republicans control the money.

That means we not only have to get two factions working together--social conservatives and fiscal conservatives--but we need to persuade the guys with the money that they have a problem if they run another RINO.

It's possible, but I wouldn't even know where to start. Last November's election was the most expensive midterm election in history, and I venture to say that all the big money boys and girls will be out in force for 2008. Hillary will raise a fortune, and the Republican candidate is going to have to match it, especially since the Dems will get their usual billion dollars worth of free publicity from the MSM.

That means getting everyone on board, one way or another. And there's not a lot of time to do it.


24 posted on 01/08/2007 3:16:09 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Just teasing...

32 posted on 01/08/2007 3:22:43 PM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah
Jeff Sessions or Duncan Hunter...

Waiting to hear more on Hunter on illegals. Jeff Sessions has the best record on illegals I have seen proven in action.

40 posted on 01/08/2007 3:29:20 PM PST by LowOiL (Paul wrote, "Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil" (Rom. 12:9))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

What about JC Watts?


43 posted on 01/08/2007 3:34:02 PM PST by Veggie Todd (Were those magic grits?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah
The problem is that under Bush, the social conservatives have come to feel that they are the sole voice of the party and won't tolerate anyone whom they can't nominate. And yes, they have become arrogant.

Tancredo/Hunter

And delusional, apparently.

44 posted on 01/08/2007 3:35:19 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

Welcome to FR.
Ya might want to check to see if an article has already been posted before you post it.:-]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1764087/posts


46 posted on 01/08/2007 3:44:07 PM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

The way things are shaping is so maddening. Historically I've never remotely had a problem with the ultimate Republican nominee, since I started voting, more than two decades ago. They've always met my political requirements, and I've fully supported them, each and every time (never was swayed by Perot, Buchanan, etc.). I don't expect to agree 100% all the time with the Rep nominee, of course, but I always have had a few trip-wires. Things I really never expected a potential Republican presidential candidate 'not' to share.

A tiny handful of requirements, such as being pro- death penalty, being a staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendmendment, and have an apparently decent family life. Those have always been imperatives. To this I've recently added the strong necessity of being anti-amnesty and enforcing our borders. I've been horrified beyond belief at Bush on this matter, propelling it into a completely predominant and non-negotiable issue for me.

If the Republican nominee doesn't meet these requirements, I'm not going to vote for him. That's a promise. And, it will be the first time in my life the Republican won't get my support. As things are shaping up now, with the current frontrunners, things are looking rather alarming, and I can't deny I'm rather aghast and flummoxed by it all. Like I said, I've always voted exclusively for Republicans in each and every election, big and small, and the prospect that the next nominee to come down the pike will be entirely unacceptable to me just leaves me dumbfounded.


52 posted on 01/08/2007 4:00:32 PM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chartnah

Ronald Reagan wing= (I am personally endorsing Mike Pence, as the honorable, as the best candidate)


76 posted on 01/08/2007 7:04:56 PM PST by JSDude1 (www.pence08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson