Skip to comments.
Bush Warns Iranians (we are effectively at war with Iran)
NY Sun ^
| January 11, 2007
| Eli Lake
Posted on 01/11/2007 4:49:21 AM PST by IrishMike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
01/11/2007 4:49:24 AM PST
by
IrishMike
To: IrishMike
Well, that just opened up the target list by a few thousand entries....:)
2
posted on
01/11/2007 4:52:45 AM PST
by
Magnum44
(Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior force is the ONLY cure)
To: IrishMike
Maybe now that The President is effectively stating the truth of our "war-by-proxy" with Iran, we can finally git-R-done...........
3
posted on
01/11/2007 4:54:17 AM PST
by
TheRobb7
(Border security is NOT Racism...it's PATRIOTISM.)
To: IrishMike
So General Abizaid is the reason Moqtada al-Sadr is still breathing after killing a large number of American soldiers?
4
posted on
01/11/2007 4:54:17 AM PST
by
DB
To: IrishMike
We'll see if we're at war, Bush certainly didn't say it. Abizaid was wrong if he thinks this makes it a two front war, there is only one front. Gates is a veteran of the Soviets in Afghanistan period. He knows what we did to the Soviets, if he is smart he will know we can't let Iran do the same to us.
5
posted on
01/11/2007 4:54:20 AM PST
by
Williams
To: Magnum44
Make em a parking lot. Would solve a lot of the world's problems.
6
posted on
01/11/2007 4:54:52 AM PST
by
pepperdog
To: IrishMike
The recent surge in the world oil supply is not coincidence!
The Saudis are increasing their capacity and when they can replace Iran's contribution of oil, Iran will start to feel the pain.
To: IrishMike
We have been "at war" with Iran since Nov 4th 1979.
Their choice, not ours.
8
posted on
01/11/2007 4:56:10 AM PST
by
Lost Dutchman
(Type Softly, And Carry a Big Keyboard.)
To: DB
The reason why Moqtada is still breathing is the State Departmen/Collin Powell, with their "great" idea of involving them into the political process!
9
posted on
01/11/2007 4:56:21 AM PST
by
SolidWood
(Sadr lives. Kill him.)
To: pepperdog
That would be my choice also. Solve a lot of problems. BTW, we have a Lhaasa Apso named Pepper - just love him to pieces - did your logon ID have anything to do with a pet?
Carolyn
10
posted on
01/11/2007 4:58:28 AM PST
by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: IrishMike
We should ship captured IEDs to Arab nationalists in the Iranian oil region. That would really muck up things for Iran. I wish our leaders were a little more pro-active.
To: IrishMike
Eschewing advice from his father's secretary of state, James Baker, to open a dialogue with Iran and Syria, the (P)president said American forces in Iraq would "disrupt" attacks from Syria- and Iran-backed terrorists, "interrupt" the supply lines reaching back to those countries, and "seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq."
I'd say this paragraph contradicts itself. Bush had a public dialogue with Iran and Syria last night. Knock it off, or BEND OVER.
12
posted on
01/11/2007 4:58:54 AM PST
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: IrishMike
Now fire up the B-52's and I don't mean the Rock and Roll band and lets get er done!
13
posted on
01/11/2007 4:58:57 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
To: IrishMike
Eschewing advice from his father's secretary of state, James Baker, to open a dialogue with Iran and Syria
You can't talk to someone until you get their attention.
14
posted on
01/11/2007 4:59:12 AM PST
by
freedomfiter2
( "if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great." de Tocqueville)
To: IrishMike
No wonder the war was going badly, we had a general that didn't want to win the damn thing.
15
posted on
01/11/2007 5:07:51 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
To: TheRobb7
If we have proof that Iran is behind the IED'd flowing into Iraq, how come we dont have bombers flying over Iran just to say hello?
To: IrishMike
(we are effectively at war with Iran)We are effectively at war with Islam.
True, the war against us is being led by a relatively small minority of true believer Islamofascists, but Nazi Germany was led by a relatively small minority of Nazifascists, most Germans only went along with the Nazis to get along (and stay alive) just like most Muslims today.
17
posted on
01/11/2007 5:14:05 AM PST
by
magslinger
(LOST-My tagline. It's short, and incredibly funny. If you find it please FReepmail Magslinger.)
To: pepperdog
Make em a parking lot. I agree. Preferably a glass parking lot.
18
posted on
01/11/2007 5:14:36 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: IrishMike
The old saying, "The only thing worse than a war is losing a war" applies here. We must win. Anticipate many Pubbie politicians are going to suck up to the antiwar moonbats. They hope to keep their jobs. Won't work. Americans love winners and loyal winners especially. Bye Bye Norm Coleman x Senator from Minnesota.
To: IrishMike
Silly journalists - we have been at war with Iran since they stormed our embassy.
20
posted on
01/11/2007 5:16:39 AM PST
by
7thson
(I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson