Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In need of help to a question about a proposed bill regarding Valerie Plame
thomas.loc.gov ^ | Jan 17, 2006

Posted on 01/17/2007 2:18:46 PM PST by Mo1

This was just brought to my attention and I need help in understanding what exactly this Bill/Amendment is about.

I tried calling over to the House of Representatives .. but they said there was no one there to help explain the details of this bill/amendment.

They suggested I go to Thomas.gov .. but I already did that.

Can any FReepers out there help direct me in the right direction and find a better way to locate what this is?

Thanks !

------------------------------------

H.R.501
Title: For the relief of Valerie Plame Wilson.


Sponsor: Rep Inslee, Jay [WA-1] (introduced 1/16/2007)      Cosponsors (None) Private bill


Latest Major Action: 1/16/2007 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).


SUMMARY AS OF:
1/16/2007--Introduced.

Provides for the relief of Valerie Plame Wilson.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: congress; earmarks; personalporkbarrel; plame; pork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last
To: Howlin

I don't know whether to LMAO or cry cause it will probably get through.


141 posted on 01/17/2007 4:56:39 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: paulat; Mo1



It sure is! Thanks for the link, paulat.


142 posted on 01/17/2007 4:59:26 PM PST by onyx (DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: paulat
Inslee introduced H.R. 501 yesterday, according to the Congressional Record. He said the loss of Plame Wilson's retirement benefits was one of the "human impacts caused by the indiscretion of government officials regarding" her covert indenity.




Now that's a downtight lie!

She's NOT losing her pension, she just has to wait like any other citizen does till she's eligible.

Inslee's a lying idiot and needs to take a few elementary reading lessons.
143 posted on 01/17/2007 5:08:08 PM PST by AmeriBrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Well .. it's out now *L*


144 posted on 01/17/2007 5:29:21 PM PST by Mo1 (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC AND DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: paulat
Here's an excerpt from the Seattle Times blog entry by their chief political reporter, David Postman:

Inslee held a small part in the Wilson/Plame saga. At was at a 2003 forum Inslee held in Shoreline that Joseph Wilson first accused someone in the White House of being involved in leaking the name of his wife. The forum was to look at intelligence failures leading up to the Iraq war. Wilson said at the event:

"I don't think we're going to let this drop. At the end of the day it's of keen interest to me to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frogmarched out of the White House in handcuffs. And trust me when I use that name. I measure my words."

Slate later reported that it was that event that first raised the "question of whether to investigate who in the Bush administration blew Plame's cover."

There's also a link to this thread in the blog entry :-)

145 posted on 01/17/2007 5:44:14 PM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn; onyx; Peach; Bahbah; Mo1
Has anybody thought to mention that she outted herself - she gave to numerous Democrat campaigns and fundraisers, using her "covert" name - AND the name of her cover company. Talk about outting herself? She did it, over and over.

The woman is a ditz. Talk about not understanding the word, "covert".

She disgraces a very needed service within the CIA - the undercover agents who risk life and limb every day for our safety.

146 posted on 01/17/2007 6:00:31 PM PST by TruthNtegrity (What happened to "Able Danger" and any testimony by Col Schaffer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I am introducing legislation to allow Mrs. Plame Wilson to qualify for her annuity, as one who has served her country for two decades, and waive the age requirement for collecting it.

A suitable reward, no doubt, for her services...

147 posted on 01/17/2007 6:18:23 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping.....

I'm going to add this to tomorrows anger management.

I am all angered out today......:-(

148 posted on 01/17/2007 6:19:12 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I know... ;)


149 posted on 01/17/2007 6:21:46 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: kristinn; Mo1; Bahbah; Peach
And David Corn has admitted - on TV and in his book, that he is the one who "parked" on these statements by Wilson and started calling at every turn and whenever/wherever possible, for the naming of WHO in the Bush Administration has released the name of a covert agent, Valerie Plame.

I can't remember when David Corn also learned that the person who had inadvertently released Valerie Plame's name was the #2 guy at State, Richard Armitage.

But he admitted that knowing who had released it didn't stop him from calling for the Bush Admnistration to admit that someone in the White House had released the information - a false smear and he knew it.

If Fitzgerald were a prosecutor with any integrity, he would start arresting people for "conspiracy" - meaning those who knew it wasn't someone IN the White House but who were yelling "fire fire" and pointing to the White House!!!

Isn't that punishable, somehow?

Libel and slander are. I know that - and David Corn, for one, has been guilty of both. What a slime.

150 posted on 01/17/2007 6:31:09 PM PST by TruthNtegrity (What happened to "Able Danger" and any testimony by Col Schaffer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity
If Fitzgerald were a prosecutor with any integrity....

And therein lies the real problem.

151 posted on 01/17/2007 6:42:10 PM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity

I will remain mystified until the end of my days, TruthNtegrity, why the Republicans didn't shout this and other key facts out from the floor of Congress. Too late now.


152 posted on 01/17/2007 7:01:40 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: paulat
Oh my goodness.............look at THAT!

Thanks for the ping and link.

153 posted on 01/17/2007 7:02:31 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
OMG, thanks for the ping. Outrageous.
154 posted on 01/17/2007 7:03:23 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; kristinn; STARWISE

Thanks, but I'm sure if it came close to a vote, a few R's in the House would have voiced up. Unbelievable that they are trying to do this.


155 posted on 01/17/2007 7:05:44 PM PST by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender

Sounds like this was a pre-planned thing. Wonder what's in it for Fitz? Did the Dems promise him a Supreme Court nomination when and if??


156 posted on 01/17/2007 8:20:38 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Snoopers-868th
Could a person who has worked for say 25 years beginning at age 18 draw an early pension at age 45 because they were terminally ill? That should answer the question for Plame who is not terminal!!

I am more familiar with the rules of the old Civil Service Retirement System than the new FERS under which all federal employees who started in the last two decades or so are covered.

Under Civil Service there is disability retirement, which a person can get if there is no *suitable* job that he can handle given his health. IIRC, it is 40% of the worker's "top three" (the average annual salary of the top three years of employment.) That is substantially less than what someone who stays the full 30 years receives.

With 30 years of service I think a federal employee could retire at any time under CSRS. I don't know whether the FERS rules are the same or not.

157 posted on 01/17/2007 9:02:18 PM PST by freespirited (Honk for disbarment of Mike Nifong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

You have to be effing kidding me. And she's out shopping her book.


158 posted on 01/18/2007 12:09:52 AM PST by AliVeritas (Stop Global Dhimming. Demand testicular fortitude from the hill. Call the crusade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
For the relief of Valerie Plame Wilson.

OK, Val. Here's your deal:

Light jail time for you and your pimp, contingent upon your NEVER being heard from AGAIN. Pay restitution for all of Mr. Libby's legal fees.

But Joe gets to keep the hat. He earned it by peddling your... self all over.

Deal?


159 posted on 01/18/2007 12:55:41 AM PST by Watery Tart (Teach me a lesson! Bring back the Fairness Doctrine! </sarc>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Oh.my.gawd.


160 posted on 01/18/2007 5:59:23 AM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson