Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Story Behind Steele: No One Offered RNC Chair to Marylander
Human Events ^ | 1/18/07 | John Gizzi

Posted on 01/19/2007 10:06:09 AM PST by NormsRevenge

For all the media discussion, blogging boom, and enthusiasm for Michael Steele as Republican National Chairman among RNC members, no one in the Bush White House ever offered or even suggested the party post to the former Maryland lieutenant governor and 2006 U.S. Senate nominee.

That’s what Steele himself told me this morning, as he arrived at the Republican National Committee’s winter meeting at the Grand Hyatt in Washington, D.C.

“No, we never had any offer,” said Steele, who was the nation’s highest-elected black Republican while serving in Maryland’s second-highest office from 2002-06. “The [talk of me as a possible national chairman] was purely a grassroots movement. Right after the election [in which Steele lost a Senate race to Democrat Ben Cardin], several members of the RNC approached me and thought it would be a good idea if I became chairman. And then the bloggers got into it. It was a grassroots movement, and it even caught me by surprise.”

But, no, he emphasized, “we never had an offer” from anyone in the Bush White House.

Recalling his days as state GOP chairman of the Free State and a member of the RNC, Steele said his presence at the latest meeting of the party’s ruling body was “coming back home for me. These folks are like family.” He also expressed gratitude to his many friends on the RNC who backed his race to become the fourth black senator since Reconstruction.

Steele said that he and the President talked after his defeat in November, that Mr. Bush “expressed his confidence in me.” But Steele also made it clear that for all the rumors that he may wind up in a Bush Cabinet or some other high-level administration post, “I have not talked to anyone about a position.”

Although he lost the Senate race and holds no office, attorney-businessman Steele is being courted by several leading Republican presidential hopefuls in ’08. “I have talked to Rudy Giuliani,” he said, “and I’m going to talk to John McCain’s people this afternoon, and later to [former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt] Romney’s people. I like them all, actually, because they helped me in my campaign last year.” Like many conservatives, Steele voiced severe doubts about McCain’s campaign-finance legislation that limited the amount and shape of money in national campaigns and in the national Republican Party.

“I’m not a big fan of that,” Steele told me, “Money is property, and I think I should do with it as I wish. Look, in Virginia, for example, you can give any amount of money to a candidate for [state] office just so long as you report it. And with the Internet, you can have it online the next day. That should be the model for the nation.”

But in stating his views on campaign finance, Steele made it clear he was not ruling out backing McCain on that issue alone and felt that, when the Supreme Court revisits the constitutionality of the campaign finance legislation, the issue “may be worked out favorably. That’s why we have the system we do.”

Although it is now confirmed that Steele was never actually considered by the White House for RNC chairman, that hasn’t stopped members of the national committee from talking him up favorably as their heartthrob for party chieftain. Over dinner last night at Washington’s Equinox Restaurant, one RNC Member told me privately: “Look, I’m not going to go up against the White House on their choice for national chairman. But I could have been really enthusiastic about Michael Steele.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: chair; michaelsteele; offered; rnc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2007 10:06:10 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Bush made a mistake by not tapping Steele. It would have appeased alot of pissed off Republicans. Instead he went and pissed us off more by naming Mel.


2 posted on 01/19/2007 10:09:45 AM PST by CollegeRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CollegeRepublican

time will tell on that....


3 posted on 01/19/2007 10:10:20 AM PST by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CollegeRepublican
Bush made a mistake by not tapping Steele. It would have appeased alot of pissed off Republicans. Instead he went and pissed us off more by naming Mel.

Stupidity makes me angry - and not helping the career of someone with talent reeks of complete idiocy.

Regards, Ivan

4 posted on 01/19/2007 10:11:03 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CollegeRepublican

I am angry about Steele and Ehrlich losing in Maryland. Maryland made a big mistake!


5 posted on 01/19/2007 10:13:19 AM PST by juliej (vote gop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Damn. This is the kind of person I would want in that position.


6 posted on 01/19/2007 10:13:46 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
But, no, he emphasized, “we never had an offer” from anyone in the Bush White House.

For me, evidence is piling up that the problems at the RNC begin and end with the White House. At some point, we're going to have to stop pulling our punches...
7 posted on 01/19/2007 10:17:17 AM PST by Antoninus ( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Steele would have been an excellent choice. Martinez is my Senator and boy am I already disappointed in his sorry amnesty butt.


8 posted on 01/19/2007 10:19:13 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Steele needs to be elected to SOMETHING. Senate, President, Congress, whatever!


9 posted on 01/19/2007 10:20:22 AM PST by RockinRight (To compare Congress to drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sailors. - Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: juliej

O'Malley's getting ready to throw some more money at "education". Brace yourself!


10 posted on 01/19/2007 10:21:17 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I agree with you. If not RNC chair, surely he can be in another position. I expect good things will come to (and of) this man.


11 posted on 01/19/2007 10:29:01 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Mel Martinez is a jerk. But he managed to get himself elected, and for whatever reason Steele did not.

It was very disappointing. But if blacks cannot be persuaded to help elect one of their own, It's hard to know what to do about it.


12 posted on 01/19/2007 10:31:25 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CollegeRepublican
Bush is going to revive the Republican party by shoving Illegal immigration down the throats of the faithful.

According to the true believers, Bush's intense negative ratings had nothing to do with the mid term defeats. It was the wacky anti illegal politicians who brought the party down.

Martinez was tapped to ram through amnesty for illegals not to revive the Republican Party.
13 posted on 01/19/2007 10:34:25 AM PST by common denominator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Steele said that he and the President talked after his defeat in November, that Mr. Bush “expressed his confidence in me.”

That's nice, but it's just talk. There aren't too many things out there with a shorter shelf-life than a defeated candidate. It's clear this WH doesn't have any interest in Mr. Steele. He'd be better off fending for himself, whether that's in private business or seeking backing elsewhere for elective office.

BTW, it's probably a plus that he's not tapped (trapped?) for serving in the Cabinet. That's likely a dead-end job at this point, treading water for another 18 months in an outgoing Administration that is facing a hostile Congress. Not enough time to get much of anything positive done for a new Cabinet officer who has ambitions for elective office.

14 posted on 01/19/2007 10:39:06 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
But if blacks cannot be persuaded to help elect one of their own

The problem is, blacks do nothing but help their own, as long as that person is a democrat.

15 posted on 01/19/2007 10:43:39 AM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chimera

Steele will do just fine and I hope he does run again for something, and I agree , taking a short term administration appointment to anything less than a position as a replacement for Cheney, were such a condition to arise, would be a dead end proposition.


16 posted on 01/19/2007 10:44:36 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... California 2007,, Where's a script re-write guy when ya need 'em?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The simple fact is Steele is a conservative, and Bush isn't. I think Steel would have been an excellent choice, a natural. Still, he and Bush aren't on the same page.


17 posted on 01/19/2007 10:48:04 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Often defeated candidates have to take some time off, perhaps work in the private sector for a while, but still stay active in the party, building grassroots support, basically starting over but building on past experience and existing relationships. Reagan did it after losing the primary to Ford in '76. He was in good position for a run in '80. Likewise Nixon. He tried too soon after losing in '60 to grab the CA governorship, and got walloped in '62. But he bided his time, kept a low profile but stayed active, and came back in '68. For some reason, there has to be this period of wandering in the wilderness, cooling off a bit, then starting over, that makes for a successful political comeback. Mr. Steele might want to consider that prior to jumping back into the fray in another run for office.
18 posted on 01/19/2007 11:12:42 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CollegeRepublican

There could be a certain amount of payback involved in this as well.

Steele worked to distance himself from the prez and some of his policies during the campaign.


19 posted on 01/19/2007 12:08:13 PM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I like M Steele very much as a candidate in 08 for US Prez


20 posted on 01/19/2007 12:29:56 PM PST by buffyt (It is not a CHOICE ~ It is a CHILD!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson