Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Sun finally rising on Solar Power? (Company funds/owns PV for your home - you buy the power)
Renewable Energy Access ^ | 1/20/2007

Posted on 01/21/2007 6:41:36 AM PST by Uncledave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: seacapn
solar panels and home power generation has gotten a lot cheaper

What is the cost per watt for solar panels?

61 posted on 01/21/2007 9:33:54 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: opbuzz

Please read the article again - it repeatedly mentions a rent payment on the equipment, aside from the KWH charge.


62 posted on 01/21/2007 9:37:48 AM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Drango

I live in east central Wisconsin, my electrical utility is
WE Energies.


63 posted on 01/21/2007 9:38:02 AM PST by MRadtke (NOT the baseball player)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

You said -- "Interesting concept. Color me skeptical but I wish em' luck."

My daughter in New Mexico had to go solar; there were no "poles" going that far out in the woods. They would have had to pay for the electrical company to install miles of it (prohibitive). So, they're all solar now.

Regards,
Star Traveler


64 posted on 01/21/2007 9:39:44 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton

Here is their website.

http://renu.citizenre.com/index.php?p=svc_overview

It answers more questions.


65 posted on 01/21/2007 9:41:04 AM PST by opbuzz (Right way, wrong way, Marine way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
How about superceeding laws by the feds stating that solar pannels can not be prohibited by any HOA

what other property rights do you want to do away with?

66 posted on 01/21/2007 9:48:47 AM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: moondoggie
This plan almost sounds too good to be true.

This plan is too good to be true. In exchange for not having to put up the upfront cost, you are giving all of the cost savings to this company instead of capturing them yourself. Right now, electricity prices are at a relative high. You are going to lock in that price for the next 25 years. Meanhwile, as solar comes down in price, you are stuck, and you don't get to benefit.

67 posted on 01/21/2007 9:51:36 AM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
In exchange for not having to put up the upfront cost, you are giving all of the cost savings to this company instead of capturing them yourself. Right now, electricity prices are at a relative high. You are going to lock in that price for the next 25 years.

Ah ha! I knew there had to be a catch!

I don*t think we*ll bother checking into this further.

Thank you:-)

68 posted on 01/21/2007 9:56:31 AM PST by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I'm a bit skeptical about whether this ever really happened: In 1931, Thomas Edison had a conversation with Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone. He said, "I'd put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don't have to wait until oil and coal run out before we tackle that."

Don't forget that before that supposed statement, that Edison had put his 'money' on supplying DC power to America, with a power plant every few blocks in metro areas.

I'm waiting for Tesla's broadcast power from the Earth's magnetic field.

69 posted on 01/21/2007 9:59:12 AM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Your house sounds like it is very cool!

Thanks the explanation. I knew there had to be a catch somewhere:-)

We didn*t build the house and to tell the truth it was built strictly for efficiency and definitely not for looks, but the longer we*re here the better we like it.

All those south windows let the sun shine in on a room with a brick floor. The room is 14*x42* and it sometimes gets so hot in here in the middle of the winter that we have to open an upstairs window to let out the heat.

70 posted on 01/21/2007 10:05:46 AM PST by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

"If you live in Alaska, Tennessee, South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, or South Dakota, the Citizenre Solution is not an option for you yet. "

Since I have about 2 feet on snow on my roof right now, it isn't an option, period. Power generation in Alaska is a funny thing, wide open spaces, very few people.

Oh well, my RV is solar powered. Since it is only used i the summer, that seems to work out for the best.


71 posted on 01/21/2007 12:30:02 PM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider

There were genuine friendships among Ford, Edison and Firestone. They went on annual "Nature Trips", and it would be surprising if something along these lines didn't come up.

Has sort of a PC sound today, but would have been a rather natural subject to arise between Edison and Ford.


72 posted on 01/21/2007 12:34:31 PM PST by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

The hidden cost in this solar rental concept is that it would "strand" the local utility or muncipal power company's assets and thus regulators would eventually have to step in and assess a "transition charge" to pay off the remaining mortgages (bonds) on existing conventional power plants, transmission lines, and distribution lines. That would likely render the concept unprofitable to homeowners. There aint no such thing as a free solar lunch.


73 posted on 01/21/2007 12:41:02 PM PST by WayneLusvardi (It's more complex than it might seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seacapn; Uncledave

This is interesting, too: http://www.marathonengine.com/cogeneration.html and http://www.climate-energy.com/


74 posted on 01/21/2007 12:58:27 PM PST by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
I don't see any drawbacks other than they might be booked for YEARS for a new install.

True, but they lock the rate at the time of signup, not install. If you sign up in 2007 and they don't get it installed until 2010, you'll be paying the equivalent 2007 rate until 2035. That's an incredibly good offer. I've never been all that interested in solar panels for my home in the past, but a person would be foolish to pass up the chance to lock their rates for the next 25 years. Electricity prices are NOT going down.
75 posted on 01/21/2007 1:17:46 PM PST by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
There were genuine friendships among Ford, Edison and Firestone. They went on annual "Nature Trips", and it would be surprising if something along these lines didn't come up.

You might find the Grove Park Inn in Ashville, NC an interesting place to visit sometime.

76 posted on 01/21/2007 9:03:27 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Bump


77 posted on 01/22/2007 9:33:51 AM PST by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Update on the "Citizenre" aka Affordable Photovoltaics solar panel rental scheme: A very skeptical article here from a guy in the solar biz asks a lot of questions and gets precious few answers from the company.

http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=47419


78 posted on 04/01/2007 5:25:09 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington
The new kind of hybrids (coming soon) have a battery that can run your car 40 miles before gas power takes over. People just have to charge their car each night. If you didn't have to buy gasoline to cover the first 40 miles you drive a day, how long between refueling could you go? I figure I could go for months. People who live relatively close to work and have stores and other services within a few miles might need to refuel only for special trips.

Having to "plug in" the vehicle just moves the origin of the pollution in creating the power to another location and still removes significant money from your pocket. I just traded in my 2003 Escape 4x4 with 3.0L V6 for a 2008 Mercury Mariner Hybrid. We purchased the 2003 used with 20,000 miles for $23,000. We traded it with 73,000 miles. The dealer gave us $13,000.

Thus far the Mariner has performed nicely. It drops into electric mode when the speed drops below 25 MPH. It kicks the engine on when exceeding 20 MPH and continuing to accelerate. Once we turn off the local arterial at 35 MPH and switch to our local street at 20 MPH, the Mariner goes into "stealth" mode. All electric and essentially silent. On a "road trip" to Idaho Falls on Thursday with freeway speeds of 75 MPH, it held almost 29 MPH. On the return trips (mostly downhill), the mileage was almost 31 MPG. That's representative of our common "road trips". Local driving is usually a 5 mile round trip that requires traversal of the 35 MPH Yellowstone Avenue on the path. Not much electric time. April 20th will mark opening day at Yellowstone National Park. It will be interesting to see how it performs inside the park. I'm expecting those extended waits for crossing buffalo herds to be more economical.

79 posted on 04/01/2007 5:41:01 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DB
In bad weather your solar panels won't be producing anything so it is unlikely you'll be on the roof fixing it during bad weather.

I've been in my new home in Idaho for 6 1/2 years now. My ham radio antennas are still packed. I can't get to the roof easily. The lowest edge is almost 32 ft above ground level. A solar cell array up there would be covered with snow from November to February and inaccessible for purposes of clearing the snow. My "fallback" is 10 cords of wood stacked on the basketball court.

80 posted on 04/01/2007 5:45:14 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson