Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani a tough conservative sell
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/25/07 | Liz Sidoti - ap

Posted on 01/25/2007 8:32:31 PM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 641 next last
To: SierraWasp

Have you read my tagline yet? Who do you think that is about? Hmmmmmmmmmmm???


Lewinski's coming back?


121 posted on 01/25/2007 9:44:18 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (“No, I have not supported that," Guiliani when asked about a ban on partial birth abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

I was not that convinced about Rudy til I started reading this thread. After reading your hysterical posts, I'm sure now. Rudy has my vote. Thanks!


122 posted on 01/25/2007 9:44:53 PM PST by Jrabbit ('scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
I would rather lose one election and try again in four years, than lose all of the issues I care deeply about permanently.

Vote for Hillary and you might as well say good bye to "all of the issues I care deeply about" permanently.

123 posted on 01/25/2007 9:44:57 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: All

NOTHING IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN BEATING HILLARY.

I got no problems with Guilliani because I don't care about principle this cycle beyond one criteria: is the GOP candidate rightward of Hillary. He can be pro Choice, anti Gun and pro tax increase and I don't care -- provided he is 1 iota less pro Choice, 1 iota less anti Gun and 1 iota less pro tax increase than she is -- and any GOP nominee will be that.

I do worry about this guy's liberal ex wife. And pictures of him in drag. I can't see how a liberal ex wife deciding to claim abuse in October 2008 can be avoided. Not a risk I want to take, but if he's nominated, he has my vote and a few bucks too.

I don't care about ANYTHING more than beating Hillary. Not anything is more important than that.


124 posted on 01/25/2007 9:46:45 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Was reading your page and noticed line 14, about the judge appointments.

So.....what type of judges do you think hillary would appoint, you know, who get to sit and decide for say, the rest of their lives, and not just four years.

125 posted on 01/25/2007 9:47:02 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper; TitansAFC



The poster's state (IL) will go for the democrat regardless. It's always interesting to check a poster's state flag. Several of the more vociferous and demanding are stuck in solid blue states.


126 posted on 01/25/2007 9:47:28 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: IslandJeff

---"And, last night, you struck me as a fellow traveler."---

What Rudy-ophiles won't tell you is that Rudy basically put to death the already weakened Pro-Life and Pro-Second Amendment movements in NY. I don't want that repeated nationwide.

Yes, my friend, I would honestly vote Hitlery over Rudy. I've been hitting the pavement for candidates and working with two solid grassroots organizations for many years now, and I tell you honestly, Rudy is a bigger threat to many of us than Hitlery.

As I said, there is already a movement in the GOP to purge all of the issues I care most about from the Republican Party. If they get their guy - Rudy - we're done. I mean all of the issues we've fought for - they're as good as dead.

I would actually seek to vote for a Conservative Third Party candidate first, but in the case that it's only Rudy or Hitlery - yes, I would honest to God prefer Hitlery.

ANYONE but Rudy - ANYONE, and I'm on board the GOP train.


127 posted on 01/25/2007 9:47:37 PM PST by TitansAFC (Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: tomcorn

Standing ovation for your post!


128 posted on 01/25/2007 9:47:44 PM PST by Jrabbit ('scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
All you have to do is look what's happening to conservatism in CA at the hands of Schwartzeneggerism, and the current supposed "leadership" of the CAGOP that are just like Rudy on the issues.

Personally, I admire Rudy and the way he did his job under unbelievable pressures that horrible day, but he ruined a lot of that with his ill advised attempt to push a crony off on President Bush and embarrassed everybody!!!

Anyway, back to CA. We Recalled a dippy Democrat and replaced him with an even dippier doozie of a politically gender confused celebrity that has turned out to be a borrow and spend girlyman of the first order.

Maria is the true Governor of CA!!!

129 posted on 01/25/2007 9:47:45 PM PST by SierraWasp (Wasn't one "Co-Presidency" enough? Will we now have to see who SHE "does" in the oval office???!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Kerik May Have Never Filed Necessary Background Checks

Melissa Russo, Government Affairs Reporter
UPDATED: 2:53 pm EST December 17, 2004

The big question: Did Bernard Kerik fill out the proper paperwork to become police commissioner? If he did, would he have passed the test? If he did not, then why not?

When a mayor selects someone for a high-level post in city government, that nominee is required to go through an extensive background check even if they've already gone through that process for a previous city job.

In 2000, then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani promoted Kerik from correction commissioner to be his top cop.

http://www.wnbc.com/news/4004260/detail.html



130 posted on 01/25/2007 9:48:33 PM PST by Afronaut (Supporting Republican Liberals is the Undeniable End to Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: onyx
The poster's state (IL) will go for the democrat regardless. It's always interesting to check a poster's state flag. Several of the more vociferous and demanding are stuck in solid blue states.

They're the most vociferous in their lectures about the rest of us being not being real conservatives.

131 posted on 01/25/2007 9:48:58 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

So it seems.


132 posted on 01/25/2007 9:49:26 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Impossible sell.


133 posted on 01/25/2007 9:49:33 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

---"Vote for Hillary and you might as well say good bye to "all of the issues I care deeply about" permanently."---

Not true. But Rudy would be then end of them. Then we have to fight both parties, which is far worse.


134 posted on 01/25/2007 9:50:18 PM PST by TitansAFC (Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
yes, I would honest to God prefer Hitlery

You'll change your mind. We have a long way to go.
135 posted on 01/25/2007 9:50:30 PM PST by IslandJeff (that for every right there is a duty, for every benefit an obligation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Rudy's Supreme Court picks will be vastly superior to Hillary's.

And I do believe he will convince you of that in the next 2 years. If not, join the Hillary campaign. Yiou make much of supporting her.


136 posted on 01/25/2007 9:52:30 PM PST by BunnySlippers (SAY YES TO RUDY !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Not true. But Rudy would be then end of them.

And Hillary won't? We haven't even scratched the surface of what Congress will look like in 2 years.

Then we have to fight both parties, which is far worse.

Stand for your principles first. Voting for Hillary shouldn't be one of them.

137 posted on 01/25/2007 9:53:10 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

---"Do you need her website address? She could use volunteers like you. You're doing her a great favor thses days."---

No. But talk to me after the GOP Primaries, if Northeastern Liberal Rudy becomes the new standard for the GOP.


138 posted on 01/25/2007 9:53:18 PM PST by TitansAFC (Pacifism is not peace; pacifists are not peacemakers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: freedomfiter2

Maybe Hitlery will hire her to keep her close in the Oral Orofice, ya 'spose?


139 posted on 01/25/2007 9:54:13 PM PST by SierraWasp (Wasn't one "Co-Presidency" enough? Will we now have to see who SHE "does" in the oval office???!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

Maybe it's not about you? Maybe there is a much larger picture here?


140 posted on 01/25/2007 9:55:01 PM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 641 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson