Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/01/2007 4:52:03 AM PST by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: radar101

The Queen must be served. She must think she received a scepter instead of a gavel.


2 posted on 02/01/2007 4:54:40 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

What happened? Did her broom throw a rod?


3 posted on 02/01/2007 4:54:48 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

she wants a military plane? OK, put on a MAC flight. She can ride in the back with the rest of the cargo (provided there is room)


4 posted on 02/01/2007 4:55:46 AM PST by joe fonebone (Either grow a pair, or vacate your chair...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Botox Pelosi can go shove it.


5 posted on 02/01/2007 4:56:07 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Just what kind of service does the Queen of Market Street think she is going to get on a military aircraft?


6 posted on 02/01/2007 4:56:44 AM PST by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

She can fly commerical (AND pay for it herself) just like most people in this country!


8 posted on 02/01/2007 4:58:55 AM PST by proudofthesouth (Mao said that power comes at the point of a rifle; I say FREEDOM does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
What is wrong with your broom Nancy?



9 posted on 02/01/2007 4:58:59 AM PST by tiredoflaundry (Where did I park my car????? Oh no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

I guess she does'nt have enough money to fly Southwest? She may have to wait for her next pay raise that Congress will pass for themselves.


10 posted on 02/01/2007 4:59:02 AM PST by Bringbackthedraft (I want my next President to have Balls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

This is an abuse of military aircraft and Pelosi knows it. Typically, because these aircraft were purchased to serve specific, military-oriented flight profiles, the cost of these flights is thousands of dollars over the price of a regularly scheduled commercial flight.

Perhaps Madam Speaker is afraid to rub shoulders with the very people she claims to represent!?


11 posted on 02/01/2007 4:59:26 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1; Txsleuth; Bahbah

Pop beads *PING*


12 posted on 02/01/2007 5:00:13 AM PST by tiredoflaundry (Where did I park my car????? Oh no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Heck, flying 'Space-A' is its own 'reward'.


13 posted on 02/01/2007 5:02:24 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

I'm picturing one of those in-flight refueling operations, but the cargo is botox...


14 posted on 02/01/2007 5:02:48 AM PST by Made In The USA (Bacon is infidelicious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Well, the Smithsonian does have the Wright Brothers airplane just hanging around...don't know how they could fit in first class, though.


15 posted on 02/01/2007 5:04:47 AM PST by crazyhorse691 (The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
Whether or not Hastert used military planes to the extent Pelosi is demanding, granting Hastert that privilege set a bad precedent.

Republicans did it to themselves. I predict she'll get what she wants.
16 posted on 02/01/2007 5:08:10 AM PST by ryan71 (You can hear it on the coconut telegraph...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101
I have no trouble with it...provided it's a fully-loaded troop carrier heading for Iraq. I would, however, advise her not to take a nap.
17 posted on 02/01/2007 5:12:17 AM PST by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

[A defense source said the speaker's regular access to a military plane began after the September 11, 2001, attacks. Rep. J. Dennis Hastert, Illinois Republican, who was speaker at the time, started using U.S. Air Force planes for domestic travel to and from his district for security reasons]

If she is using 'security' as the reason she needs free flights, who does she want security from? The way the socialists are hammering away at Bush for his national security measures, you would think we don't need to fear a threat anymore.


18 posted on 02/01/2007 5:12:21 AM PST by RetSignman (DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Pelosi's staff and family should not get these flights unless they are small in number, and accompanying Pelosi, but I think it is reasonable that the Speaker get a nonpublic (e.g., military) flight home, provided she pays at least what she would on an airline. It is certainly no more inappropriate than the military officers who take the little "military" business jets when traveling around the country. Remember that even as far back as the Lincoln assassination, we had a conspiracy to kill the whole top line of succession, from the losing side in the Civil War. The Islamo-fascists are motivated and capable of repeating this effort, and of figuring out Pelosi's quite regular flights home. We have to make it as difficult as possible for our enemies to target more than one such leader at a given time. Given the very public schedules of politicians, especially Bush and Cheney, it is helpful if their travel be secured from the public. This should not be a partisan issue. (But again, we should not be providing Pelosi with larger planes at taxpayer cost, so she can bring along others who are not in the succession.)


19 posted on 02/01/2007 5:12:26 AM PST by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Whats wrong with her broom? No long range tanks? Get one from ACME.


22 posted on 02/01/2007 5:18:02 AM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

Is she going to use MAC flights and bump Military families using MAC for emergencies?


24 posted on 02/01/2007 5:19:59 AM PST by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: radar101

For one who holds the military in such disdain, I don't think she should be able to use military aircraft to shuttle back and forth to SF. However, given her importance in the structure of the government, she should be afforded the use of the military flights. Put her in one of the backward facing seats without the comforts of heat/air conditioning. Might break her will to fly via Military Airlines.


26 posted on 02/01/2007 5:23:03 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson