Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Irked mom stirs up breast milk brouhaha
Orange County register (via CC Tmes) ^ | Feb. 12, 2007 | Blythe Bernhard

Posted on 02/12/2007 11:33:47 AM PST by Michael.SF.

SANTA ANA - A woman who was forced to throw away her breast milk at an airport this month is fighting to change the way nursing mothers are treated in the changing world of high-security travel.

Airport security agents in Las Vegas earlier this month banned Rachel Popplewell of Capistrano Beach from bringing her breast milk on a flight to California because she didn't have her baby with her.

Popplewell, who says she followed all the rules for bringing liquids on a plane, sent a written complaint to the Transportation Security Administration, which oversees airport screening.

"You should be allowed to carry it, and you should be treated like a human being who is feeding your child," Popplewell said.

A spokesman for the federal agency said he had not seen a record of the incident.

"If she had exactly what was required, I don't understand what happened," Nico Melendez said. "It should not have happened. Please accept our apology."

Popplewell, a marketing director, flew to Las Vegas for a one-day business trip to a footwear trade show. While there, she used her breast pump to collect 6 ounces of milk, which she planned to bring home to her 9-month-old son, Mason.

Popplewell divided the milk into two 3-ounce bottles and placed the bottles in a zip-top plastic bag, as stipulated by security regulations. But when Popplewell, 40, told a screener at McCarran International Airport what was in the bottles, she was forced to throw her milk away.

The TSA has restricted carry-on liquids since last summer after an incident in England alleged to have been a terrorism plot involving liquid explosives. Liquids must be in 3-ounce containers, which must be in plastic bags.

(Excerpt) Read more at contracostatimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: breastfeeding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Seems she was obeying the rules and they still stopped her. On the other hand, she really did not need to bring the milk back with her, since she had milk available in the original containers.
1 posted on 02/12/2007 11:33:48 AM PST by Michael.SF.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Maybe she was dehydrated? LMAO


2 posted on 02/12/2007 11:35:00 AM PST by statered ("And you know what I mean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

I am a mommy and I'm special. But seriously, why not do some sensible profiling and stop harassing Americans?


3 posted on 02/12/2007 11:35:19 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

I can see that point, but really she needed to throw it away anyway, since it could not be kept frozen.


4 posted on 02/12/2007 11:39:36 AM PST by Shimmer128 (My beloved is mine and I am his. Song of Solomon 2:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

This treatment is udderly ridiculous.


5 posted on 02/12/2007 11:39:41 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
On the other hand, she really did not need to bring the milk back with her, since she had milk available in the original containers.

I know that's a clever line, but my wife has to express milk every day so I can bottle-feed my son in her absence.

I swear, there are times when I'd value those little plastic bags over bags of gold. That she had to throw them away after following all the rules is criminal, but not unexpected.

6 posted on 02/12/2007 11:40:09 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer128

Not if she had it in a little cooler. That is how I flew with bottle of breastmilk.


7 posted on 02/12/2007 11:42:54 AM PST by elc (Guns kill people the same way the spoon made Rosie O'Donnell fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

The "original containers" have limited capacity. In addition to physical discomfort associated with not emptying them, their production will quickly slow in response to not being emptied regularly. The little tyke is entitled to all his mama can produce.


8 posted on 02/12/2007 11:44:02 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elc

duh. of course. :D


9 posted on 02/12/2007 11:44:40 AM PST by Shimmer128 (My beloved is mine and I am his. Song of Solomon 2:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

I find this whole liquids thing rather silly. It is quite possible for someone to take down a plane by packing enough explosives inside of a metal sealed tube or battery LOOKING device that would fool the average TSA screening agent.

For that matter, thin film plastic explosives can be worn on the body, under a hair piece, within a belt, socks, etc.

In short, targeting the METHOD of attack is not as effective as targeting the PERSON who will be carrying out the attack.


10 posted on 02/12/2007 11:45:29 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Airport security agents in Las Vegas earlier this month banned Rachel Popplewell of Capistrano Beach

Particularly if the airplane A/C is on high...

11 posted on 02/12/2007 11:46:18 AM PST by mikrofon (Breast Milk Brew-haha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
On the other hand, she really did not need to bring the milk back with her, since she had milk available in the original containers.

ROTFLOL! Good point.


12 posted on 02/12/2007 11:47:20 AM PST by Tamar1973 (Note to Hillary, Boxer and Fonda: The peas called, they want their pod back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Even for a one day trip, I'm a bit surprised that she only had 6 ounces of milk. This might be in the TMI category, but it only takes me about 2 hours to produce that much milk (3 oz from each side).

If she was gone most of the day, what happened to the rest of the milk. Did she not have a problem throwing that away?

Not that I'm condoning TSA for making her throw it away. It seems she followed their guidelines, and they messed up (as usual).


13 posted on 02/12/2007 11:47:30 AM PST by elc (Guns kill people the same way the spoon made Rosie O'Donnell fat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

When our twins were babies we had to use the neighbor's freezer in addition to ours for storage! And after seeing what my wife had to go through to get some of those early bags filled, if someone tried to take them away it would have been a "from my cold dead hands" moment!


14 posted on 02/12/2007 11:47:50 AM PST by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

For cryin' out loud, the kid didn't starve. He was fed while she was gone. She didn't need to bring the milk back. Sheesh!


15 posted on 02/12/2007 11:49:01 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer128
What's frustrating is that just about everyone in the building probably knew this woman was no terrorist and there was nothing wrong with her breast milk. This happens thousands upon thousands of times a day. But should anything ever happen, do you think we'd blame terrorists. No way, it'd be the airlines fault, TSA's fault, and of course Republican politicians' fault.
16 posted on 02/12/2007 11:49:04 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

My thoughts exactly.


17 posted on 02/12/2007 11:52:28 AM PST by Michael.SF. (It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
This treatment is udderly ridiculous.

LOL !!

18 posted on 02/12/2007 11:52:45 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
"If she had exactly what was required, I don't understand what happened," Nico Melendez said. "It should not have happened. Please accept our apology."

And that is the correct answer. Refreshing to see nowdays.

19 posted on 02/12/2007 11:52:48 AM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
In addition to your common sense post -- wasn't there a huge brouhaha over a mother breast-feeding her child on a plane just a few weeks ago? I seem to recall a flight attendant throwing a hissy, and a number of people going on about how offensive it was for a woman to be feeding her child from the appropriate natural container, as it were...

People on planes can't have it both ways - let her bring it in bottles, or let her boob the baby. Or DON'T complain when the baby is crying on the flight.

Then again, a lot of people just like to bitch endlessly.

20 posted on 02/12/2007 11:53:59 AM PST by Malacoda (A day without a pi$$ed-off muslim is like a day without sunshine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson