Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cracking Concrete's Code
ScienceNOW Daily News ^ | 2 February 2007 | Robert F. Service

Posted on 02/15/2007 1:49:01 AM PST by neverdem

Where can you go to see a cool example of nanotechnology? Well, just about everywhere. A new study reveals that plain old concrete, the most common human-made material on the planet, owes its properties to its nanoscale structure. Down the road, this new understanding could lead to novel forms of concrete that require less energy and CO2 to generate and might allow researchers to engineer its properties much as they have done with advanced steel alloys. Concrete isn't what comes to mind when most people think of nanomaterials. It's the oldest engineered construction material and was first used by the Romans. Today, some 2.5 billion tons of the stuff is made every year, but at considerable environmental cost. Concrete starts out as a combination of limestone, clay, and gypsum that is heated to 1500 degrees Celsius to form cement. When combined with water, cement glues particles of sand and gravel together to create concrete. Estimates indicate that the energy used to create concrete accounts for 5 to 10 percent of the world's CO2 emissions.

As concrete sets and begins to dry, it forms a network made up primarily of calcium-silicate-hydrate, or C-S-H. The organization of that network has long remained a bone of contention among materials experts, as concrete's structure has proven challenging to confirm with traditional tools, such as x-ray, electron, and neutron scattering. To gain better insight, Franz-Josef Ulm, a civil engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, and his postdoc Georgios Constantinides used a needlelike "nanoindentation" device to prod different types of hardened cement pastes--the part of concrete that holds everything together--from around the world. An atomic force microscope allowed them to see the nanostructure and judge the strength of each paste by measuring the effects of the needle. They found that each type of cement consisted of myriad 4-to-5-nanometer-wide C-S-H particles that were either randomly arranged or ordered like oranges on a store shelf. The combination of those nanostructures largely accounted for the material's strength and durability.

"It's a great paper," says Hamlin Jennings, a civil engineer at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. Jennings adds that if researchers can learn to control the packing of C-S-H nanoparticles in concrete they might be able to engineer concrete like alloyed steel. Ulm says that the findings could also help researchers find novel starting materials that create the tightly packed nanostructures without vast energy inputs, thereby helping people tread a bit more lightly on the planet.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: clay; concrete; geopolymer; geopolymerization; geopolymers; gypsum; josephdavidovits; limestone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Concrete Basics
1 posted on 02/15/2007 1:49:03 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Ping


2 posted on 02/15/2007 1:51:11 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Estimates indicate that the energy used to create concrete accounts for 5 to 10 percent of the world's CO2 emissions. "

Concrete Reabsorbs CO2

During the life of a concrete structure, the concrete carbonates and absorbs the CO2 released by calcination during the cement manufacturing process. Once concrete has returned to fine particles, full carbonation occurs, and all the CO2 released by calcination is reabsorbed. A recent study indicates that in countries with the most favorable recycling practices, it is realistic to assume that approximately 86% of the concrete is carbonated after 100 years. During this time, the concrete will absorb approximately 57% of the CO2 emitted during the original calcination. About 50% of the CO2 is absorbed within a short time after concrete is crushed during recycling operations. (Nordic Innovation Centre Project 03018).

3 posted on 02/15/2007 1:57:45 AM PST by endthematrix (Both poverty and riches are the offspring of thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What an interesting article and link. Thanks.


4 posted on 02/15/2007 1:57:54 AM PST by grannie9 (Between slobs, dogs, and Englishmen, I'm always in hot water.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
this new understanding could lead to novel forms of concrete

Big deal. The mafia has been making shoes and overcoats out of this stuff for years.

5 posted on 02/15/2007 2:03:01 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

LOL...Maybe they should consult some goombahs in Joisey for future applications.


6 posted on 02/15/2007 2:09:33 AM PST by gr8eman (Everybody is a rocket scientist...until launch day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

lol...


7 posted on 02/15/2007 2:12:58 AM PST by sit-rep ( http://trulineint.com/latestposts.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

8 posted on 02/15/2007 2:21:40 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

"The mafia has been making shoes and overcoats out of this stuff for years."

As well as caskets...I have no doubt that Hoffa is bridge support on some highway.


9 posted on 02/15/2007 2:32:34 AM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

lol


10 posted on 02/15/2007 2:59:00 AM PST by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

Hey! Guess we're both up early this morning.


11 posted on 02/15/2007 3:09:28 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Seen quite a few laborers get hernias trying to move 2" slump concrete. Worked with a contractor a few times, over 25 years ago, who always poured with about an 11" slump. No idea how that worked out in the long run.

Been pouring for 30 years plus and 4" or 5" slump mud, has held up as well as anything anywhere else. Material varies widely and has much more deleterious effects than slump.


12 posted on 02/15/2007 3:45:17 AM PST by David Isaac (Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter

ping


13 posted on 02/15/2007 4:02:30 AM PST by IncPen (When Al Gore Finished the Internet, he invented Global Warming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Estimates indicate that the energy used to create concrete accounts for 5 to 10 percent of the world's CO2 emissions.

Why is CO2 emission, or the lack of it, important? Antropogenic Global Warming is a myth.

14 posted on 02/15/2007 4:03:11 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

CO2 is a pollutant. That's why plants love it so much.


15 posted on 02/15/2007 4:07:53 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Vaclav Klaus: "A whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

I believe the greater long term impact on CO2 levels of from making concrete come NOT from the energy used to make the concrete itself, but rather the CO2 absorbing vegetation the concrete replaces.


16 posted on 02/15/2007 4:08:05 AM PST by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Interesting post. Concrete has always been excellent when in compression. The problem is in tension. If there are ways to change the molecular structure to compensate for this property it would certainly be a giant step forward due to having to compensate with steel reinforcement which is very expensive.


17 posted on 02/15/2007 4:16:34 AM PST by SWEETSUNNYSOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Thanks for posting. I LOVE concrete. Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
18 posted on 02/15/2007 4:50:05 AM PST by BillyBonebrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
I have no doubt that Hoffa is bridge support on some highway.

Noted Mafia hitman the "Iceman" says that Hoffa was shot, stuffed into the trunk of a Toyota that was subsequently sent to a car crushing plant. The car was crushed and melted in a furnace. Hoffa is a hood ornament somewhere....

19 posted on 02/15/2007 6:21:46 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Just the facts, ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Recycling Hoffa's carbon footprint was easier when his actual footprint is much smaller ....


Seriously, I enjoy seeing any improvement in concrete's properties, but the problem will be "aging" the new research results to prove (beyond the shadow of a bridge!) that the "new" concrete can be safely and uniformly actually crushed and made in the field by real workers (not in one pound batches by PhD's), be shipped, poured and cast in the field by real construction crews, and then having the results last for 50 - 100 years after pouring.

It's easy to see the new particles/new methods failing under vibration or stress over time.
20 posted on 02/15/2007 6:28:21 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson