Skip to comments.
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming
National Geographic News ^
Posted on 03/02/2007 6:22:22 AM PST by WBL 1952
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: xcamel; neverdem; secretagent
See?
Even his chart slows the temperature has "leveled off" since Bush became president!
Seriously.
Do you see the BOTTOM of the recent "red" lines - the lines that are high-lighted as IF they were filled in from 0 to the current temp increase of .3 degrees? On the REAL chart from NASA for troposphere temperatures (which is what this character has warped for his purposes) the red lines are the max-min points for each year. They are NOT filled in like he has done. They do NOT show a continuous rise since 1980.
They do NOT show a "0" point at 1980 - a LOW point in NASA's graph!
This graph from the warmer socialist is a LIE. Temperatures since the 1998 peak have been up and down, but have NOT increased since that period: they are steady, but cycling up AND DOWN around the same point they were 8 years ago.
61
posted on
03/02/2007 3:15:48 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Arrowhead1952
62
posted on
03/02/2007 4:25:14 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: dfwgator
Yeah, it's kind of hard selling *global warming* when people are digging out from a blizzard in -20 degree weather.
63
posted on
03/02/2007 4:27:15 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
64
posted on
03/02/2007 5:41:36 PM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: WBL 1952
65
posted on
03/02/2007 5:47:19 PM PST
by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
On the REAL chart from NASA for troposphere temperatures (which is what this character has warped for his purposes) the red lines are the max-min points for each year. They are NOT filled in like he has done. They do NOT show a continuous rise since 1980.Gristmill ("How to talk to skeptic") got the graph shown from the Climate Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia:
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/
I haven't clicked on all their links, so I don't know where they got their data, and so can't agree or disagree on their having falsified the NASA data.
They do NOT show a "0" point at 1980 - a LOW point in NASA's graph!
What NASA graph?
I think CRU set the "0" point at 1939, not 1980:
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/gtc2005.csv
To: WBL 1952
Hints? It pretty much screams it out ot my ears.
67
posted on
03/02/2007 7:19:00 PM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: ancient_geezer
To: secretagent
It's not so much that "falsified" NASA data, more that they (deliberately) are presenting it from "zero" points and in a graph format that shows the wrong conclusion. So you see large red lines, but not the declines and drops.
You "see" a huge increase, but the actual increase is LESS THAN 1/2 of one degree. Make sense?
69
posted on
03/02/2007 7:28:30 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: WBL 1952
Must be those Sport Utility Vehicles charging over the dunes of Mars. Bingo! Ali Gorat would agree.
70
posted on
03/02/2007 7:50:51 PM PST
by
A. Pole
(Gore:We are the most powerful force of nature.We are changing the relationship between Earth and Sun)
To: WBL 1952
Sun causes global warming. Who'd have thunk?
To: Beowulf
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
So you see large red lines, but not the declines and drops.I see short and tall red lines and blue lines, and thick and thin red and blue lines:
Declines and drops - do you mean the black trend line doesn't decline and dip where it should?
To: LeGrande
74
posted on
03/02/2007 9:15:20 PM PST
by
LeGrande
(Muslims, Jews and Christians all believe in the same God of Abraham.)
To: WBL 1952
75
posted on
03/03/2007 1:18:28 AM PST
by
Buzwardo
To: metmom
Gore may get doctorate (Univ.Of Minnesota, and Liberalism, CRAZY GORE ALERT ) That is too rich. I think Algore has lost the last brain cells he has with his global warming theory.
76
posted on
03/03/2007 4:03:27 AM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(The dims and Ron Paul screwed our troops.)
To: secretagent
How this graph looks for the previous ten centuries?
77
posted on
03/03/2007 4:39:06 AM PST
by
A. Pole
(Gore:We are the most powerful force of nature.We are changing the relationship between Earth and Sun)
To: WBL 1952
George W. Bush owns the Hummer franchise on Mars.
78
posted on
03/03/2007 4:44:22 AM PST
by
reg45
Comment #79 Removed by Moderator
To: WBL 1952
"Mars, too, appears to be enjoying more mild and balmy temperatures."
Nothing new here. I have been hearing it for over a year, but the Global Warming thought police, keep a lid on it.
It is no wonder that so many people are ignorant about the facts of climate change.
Ask anyone about the MWP, you will get a blank stare.
80
posted on
03/03/2007 9:34:11 AM PST
by
AlexW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson