Posted on 03/04/2007 5:53:01 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu
|
Members of the Cherokee Nation of native Americans have voted to revoke tribal citizenship for descendants of black slaves the Cherokees once owned. A total of 76.6% voted to amend the tribal constitution to limit citizenship to "blood" tribe members.
Supporters said only the Cherokees had the right to determine tribal members. Opponents said the amendment was racist and aimed at preventing those with African-American heritage from gaining tribal revenue and government funding. The Cherokee Nation has 250,000 to 270,000 members, second only to the Navajo. 'Right to vote' The list of descendants stems from the Dawes Commission, established by Congress more than 100 years ago.
It created two lists - one of "blood" Cherokees and one of black freedmen. Principal Chief Chad Smith said about 8,700 people had voted - more than the turnout for the Cherokee constitution vote of four years ago. He said: "The Cherokee people exercised the most basic democratic right, the right to vote. "Their voice is clear as to who should be citizens of the Cherokee Nation. No-one else has the right to make that determination." But opponents of the amendment levelled accusations of discrimination. Tribal council member Taylor Keen said: "This is a sad chapter in Cherokee history... this is not my Cherokee Nation. My Cherokee Nation is one that honours all parts of her past."
Saturday's vote followed a ruling by the Cherokee Nation Supreme Court last year securing tribal citizenship for descendants of freedmen. Members can obtain government benefits and tribal services including housing and medical support. Slaves were held by a number of native American tribes and were freed after the Civil War in 1866.
|
Brotherhood walks, it's all about the cashish.
Regards.
OK. So why should anyone object to that?
Opponents said the amendment was racist and aimed at preventing those with African-American heritage from gaining tribal revenue and government funding.
Ah, the crux of the matter.
More Cherokees voted over this than for their constitution, according to the article.
Are the Cherokee being niggardly in their approach to tribal membershp? Are they throwing another faggot in the fires of racism?
Descendants of Cherokee slaves received a form of reparation. Reparations are terminated.
So are the libs capable of accusing the Cherokees of being racist?
It's pretty clear that the "slaves" were part of the Cherokee polity, and this is the United States, not Canada.
This ain't over ~
Guessing that the majority of Americans have some Amerindian blood--though usually in small amounts only.
The main tribe, already in Oklahoma, decided that "real" cherokees were the ones who had gotten there first, and cut the "trail of tears" Cherokees out of tribal membership. When the communal tribal lands in Oklahoma were divided up among the members (late 1800's), the trail of tears Cherokees didn't get land (all Cherokee land is now private - no "reservations" exist in Okla.) To this day the trail of tears Cherokees don't get tribal health care and other federal goodies, even if they are 100% "Indian".
(I'm going from 30 year old memory on the history, so no whining if I've got a couple things wrong here)
Indian "blood" is the ultimate get-into-Ivy-League-school-with-mediocre-grades-free card.
Why don't we just call a spade a spade? There will be no more monkey-business with tribal funds. To all hangers-on who hoped for a gravy-train: the jig is up. Anyway, these disparate factions haven't had anything to do with each other in a coon's age.
Apparently you don't understand tribal sovereignty status. The founders of the United States considered the Indian nations as another nation. This is documented by the fact that they signed treaties with them.
The US government can only sign treaties with another government. This was long before any Indian casinos were proposed.
And by the way, each tribe constructs it's own constitution.
Don't know what this is all about? Can you say CASINO REVENUE? At a casino near Fresno only the few hundred tribal members first agreeing to the casino keep the yearly, per member jackpots (Indian profit-sharing)of close to half a million each. Excluded tribal members regularly picket the place trying to join, to no avail.
A group of nameless tribal leaders adorn the casino walls. It might as well say "no new members welcome", even if you can prove blood lineage. What a sham.
The new caption on the old Indian ad could be "First they exclude me from the tribe, then they throw french fries, wrapper and all at me in the street. Man have I been trashed."
Or "You want something to cry about? We'll give you something to cry about. We'll call it sovereignity, but it will really mean, most of you are left out in the cold."
I thought slavery was a White Man thing, and that 'Native' Americans had a PC culture... (ha).
I don't believe that for a minute. At this point I think you'd be a lot safer to say that most of us have a lineage that came through Ellis Island. Although, now that I think for a minute, my Grandma was a Southern Lady from New Orleans, so who knows. I may just have some slave owning blood in me. I really doubt it about the amerind though.
How can the election be a 'fraudulent election' if the tribe members voted on it?
How can a person that is not of Cherokee blood hold a membership?
Geeze, my husband is more than 1/16th Delaware, wonder if he can get a membership.
Sorry, but I graduated Magna Cum Laude with no "Indan Money." Stop painting us with a broad brush of ignorance.
Just like any other ethnicity, we have many conservative tribal members and many liberals.
And yet, it is obvious that the tribal nations are not fully sovereign now, not even as sovereign as the states.
True, but not complete narby, in WNC, a large group of Cherokee stayed behind I think they handle their own affairs seperately from the Oklahoma branch if you will.
I've done some work in the Andrews-Murphy valley area of Western NC, an area that suffered from the trail of tears. The old USGS topo maps of that area show a scattering of small, rectangular Cherokee reservations deep in the hollers and coves away from the main valley. I'm guessing those are remnants of Indian family land from ancestors that hid out, didn't go to Oklahoma, and received Federal recognition decades later.
Fewer "Cherokees" means a bigger slice of the handout pie for each. TYG.
" in WNC, a large group of Cherokee stayed behind I think they handle their own affairs seperately from the Oklahoma branch if you will."
Yep, and they have their own Harrah's Casino at Cherokee, NC.
http://www.nc-cherokee.com/
http://www.harrahs.com/casinos/harrahs-cherokee/hotel-casino/property-home.shtml
The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma (subject of this article) and the Eastern Band of Cherokees (NC/GA) are separately recognized by the U.S. government. The different factions have been in place for nearly 200 years. The OK Cherokee government is incredibly corrupt, but some of the other tribal governments out there are even worse.
It's all about the money.
I always wondered how much the US government would respect their soverignty if the Indian nations passed a law mandating that every citizen own a belt fed weapon.
Got Dutch?
So based on this precedent, can we vote to expel our liberals, since they cause us so much trouble?
Congratulations on your hard work. But don't blame me for non-existent "ignorance". Native-Americans routinely get bumped ahead of whites and even blacks for elite-school admissions and scholarships, as well as corporate placements, regardless of qualifications. In one high school we surveyed, a "Native blood" female student was admitted and given a full scholarhsip to Wellesley even though 43 other female applicants in her school had both higher grades and higher standardized scores. Affirmative action hurts those from an ethnic group who excel, while others among that groups slide by. This is rarely an issue with Indians, because the amounts are so few. With blacks the effect is extreme--I am white and know many people who go out of their way to avoid black doctors because of the perception that many of them were admitted to med school based only on race. That perception is buttressed by real-world examples, such as "Dr" Patrick Chavis, the landmark affirmative action plaintiff that liberals made a poster child in the 1970s. Chavis got admitted ahead of a more qualified white, which led to a landmark Supreme Court ruling. Chavis later killed a patient in a negligent liposuction, and paralyzed another. Racial quotas like this tarnish those "minorities" who work hard and achieve by themselves.
Red-face speak with heap forked tongue to Buffalo People. Bad medicine. Give red face no fire-water or wampum.
Although they (and people from other people groups (races)) might not say it, the general view is that any human half European descended and half non-European descended is usually considered the non-European descent. In those cases, it is as though being of European descent is the exclusive descent.
This pretty much sums it up. There have been other groups purging their rolls as well. Money talks. Politics is the tool sometimes of those with power/money to consolidate it more.
It's not like he was put on trial for this (as far as I know).
Still, Bakke's real problem with the admissions board was the anti-military bias of several of its members.
Chavis would have been admitted with or without Bakke around.
The US government should ahve withheld all federal aid or contracts from the University of California as a consequence of their actions in the Bakke case.
Alas, this was 1973 and the Liberals were riding high and anti-military attitudes were popular.
The persistent failure by Malkin and others to recognize this component of Bakke's problem is truly astounding.
Does lineage include percentage?
A few years ago when I looked into it (Der Prinz has Cherokee ancestors :-), anyone with a provable ancestor on the Dawes Roll could register with the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. It really built up their numbers (and therefore their perceived value as a political bloc).
I don't recall seeing that as a requirement.
Well, I guess this means any reparation payments to blacks for past slavery can be debited from the Native American budget accounts.
In many states now as draconian laws are getting passed to outlaw smoking even in bars, these laws don't apply to Indian reservations. On Hotel/Casino near here (Lucky Eagle) had a large "Smoke Easy" even complete with cigar manufacturers, cigar store owners, free booze and scantily clad serving girls. Lots of stuff was raffled off. Collections were taken for the armed services.
In Travis McGee's book "Domestic Enemies" the Indian reservations have begun minting their own money out of gold, as the US $ has devalued to near uselessness.
As the rest of the nation becomes a hellish nanny state there maybe many things we have to go to "Indian Country" to enjoy.
Say what you will about their problems, at this point they seem better able to provide basic freedoms (like say having a nice Avo #2 with your Johnny Walker) than most of the States of the Union.
It is a strange anachronism that they are all racial states. Everywhere else racial states are bad. The Serbs, who are about as auntonomous a little band as the Cherokee only wanted to accomplish what the Indians in this story are doing - sort out those of pure blood from the mongrels and cast the mongrels out of the motherland.
This double standard I find amusing, rather than irritating for some reason.
Every instance of association with Indian nationals, direct or remote, Indian or government agency, which I have had over a lifetime of living in the American Southwest, have been accompanied by an intuition of corruption worse than if one was associating with close friends of Tony Soprano.
I've also never known a privately owned business fulfilling a simple contract relationship with an Indian nation to have not been defrauded some fair value of their effort, if not their entire enterprise.
IMHO, they bring most of their woe upon themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.