"a panel of journalists said"
Yawwwwn...
Posted on 03/14/2007 3:43:29 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Bunch of lawyers discussing how they can make money from this hoax
Very true!
I will blame my Nyquil dosage and a few errant sneezes and coughs for this discrepancy. LOL
Also consider the effects of skyscraper technology, building above ground and below, double decker highways with robot cars forming compressed virtual trains. Technology changes everything. The cliche "buy land, they aren't making any more" isn't really true, we're building more land all the time.
Wow, Singapore only has 1635.9 sq ft per person now. A cruise ship only uses 37 square feet of ocean per person, no square feet of land at all.
I love the graph but it's not absolutely obvious at first glance what it means.
The temperature rises or falls, and then the CO2 level rises or falls - some four hundred years later!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
The video link below has real scientists not Green Goron Enviralist Druids pretending to be scientists. They shred Goron‘s Gorebull Warming bs:
I doubt it's odd at all. While I haven't plotted it out, I have looked up the NWS temperature records for my city, (Pittsburgh) actual measurements, which officially go back to 1871. Without even plotting it's obvious from looking at the tabular data that it would follow a similar declining best fit curve as that chart does with all of the hottest years occurring before 1950 and the coldest years by far occurring in the 1970s.
The rising slope you see constantly from the Global Warming Swindlers is a fictitious number based on an "average" global temperature. A new paper published shows how that number is statistically meaningless from a scientific standpoint and really tells us nothing about trends.
I doubt it's odd at all. While I haven't plotted it out, I have looked up the NWS temperature records for my city, (Pittsburgh) actual measurements, which officially go back to 1871. Without even plotting it's obvious from looking at the tabular data that it would follow a similar declining best fit curve as that chart does with all of the hottest years occurring before 1950 and the coldest years by far occurring in the 1970s.
The rising slope you see constantly from the Global Warming Swindlers is a fictitious number based on an "average" global temperature. A new paper published shows how that number is statistically meaningless from a scientific standpoint and really tells us nothing about trends.
And why didn't I notice your post before this? It could be a conspiracy! (Or not.)
The graph for New York City is pretty steeply up during the same period. Maybe the Global Warming hasn't made it up the river to Albany yet.
I like how there "will be" both massive flooding and water shortages. Sounds like a system of well thought trenches could solve both problems.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.