Giuliani Seen as More Likeable Candidate in U.S.

Angus Reid Global Monitor ^ | March 18, 2007 | Angus Reid Global Monitor

[bluecollarman]

Well Since I am not doing much with the site might as well do Rudy Stuff for now. ....

 

Rudybots Announce  New "Rudy" Whiskey.

It's Time to "Rino" with Rudy Whiskey
Industry News, 16 March, 2007
After busting on the scene with a flash and a bang all the rage is now Rudy . Why? Because we wan't to win...really bad! We don't care about Guns, abortions or the homosexual agenda we JUST WANT TO WIN DAMNIT!

No sir, no more value votes for us! Just beating Hillary is all that matters. So drink yours today and it will help wash the taste right out of your mouth!

Rudy whiskey will make you want to throw away your  guns and dress like a woman! Good Stuff!

 

[TommyDale]

Rudy is more likeable in his drag outfit. At least that's what the New Yorkers tell us.

[presently no screen name]

That is far from a landslide

No one mentioned landslide, it's 'more likable' candidate.

[narses]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1777111/posts?page=290#290

The words of Jim Robinson on pushing a liberal like Rino Rudy.

[Dog Gone]

We post the same spam over and over again.

Nobody is interested a real discussion.

[Dog Gone]

Yeah, you've posted that link a hundred times, too.

I read it the first time.

[dmw]

DG, you mentioned on another thread that the Rudygogaga fans don't spam here, or very rarely do. So, what do you call it when Fair Opinion and areafiftyone come here day after day posting dozens of articles in favor of RINO Rudy? My definition of spam is when liberals come here and post a gazillon articles promoting their candidate on a forum where a good 70% of it's members have indicated that they do not support Rudy. Most of us here are conservatives and we really don't care to see this liberal propaganda posted here 24/7 (I know it's allowed, but it's unwanted). It would seem to me that if a majority of the people here don't support Rudy, and yet these two individuals continue to post articles that the majority of us find irritating and unwanted, that would be considered spam.

Explain to me, if you will, why you don't consider the ceaseless posting of pro-Rudy articles spam, but everything that's posted by our side is called spam?

[Man50D]

No sir, no more value votes for us! Just beating Hillary is all that matters.

Yep. The reasoning is to vote for one socialist to prevent another from taking office. That's showing the RATS!

[narses]

[Ole Okie]

Thanks.

We haven't seen that spam more than a hundred and fifty times.

[Sunsong]

Fred Thompson is in the wings. If he runs, Rudy will have his work cut out for him. McCain's and Romney's candidacies will probably rapidly collpase, as wild guess, with Fred in.

I could easily support Thompson. But I wonder what he is waiting for to get in? Is he waiting for McCain to implode? McCain seems to be making a push right now...and McCain is supposedly his good friend. And will McCain even concede before any primary votes are cast? Is he working with NBC over his contract? Is he checking out money possiblities? Doing some market research as to how he sells overall? Waiting to see what kind of dirt emerges before he puts his family through the meat grinder of a campaign?

[narses]

1st time posted on this thread. But thanks for the bump.

[dynachrome]

I'd rather drink this:

[Dog Gone]

Call me crazy, but my definition of spam is THE EXACT SAME POST being posted here endlessly. Like narses is doing right now on this thread.

New articles are not spam. They may be boring or annoying, but they're not spam.

If you're posting the EXACT DAMN THING you've posted 20 times before, that's spam.

[citizencon]

that is, in the absence of a really more likable candidate, that is...

[TAdams8591]

I don't know that Rudy's a socialist, though I believe Hillary is. Rudy's a Liberal and there are thousands of politicians in the Democratic Party just like him. On that we agree. : )

[bluecollarman]

"We post the same spam over and over again. Nobody is interested a real discussion."

Gee DG, I resent that. I try really hard to come up with new spam every day!

[Sunsong]

We post the same spam over and over again.

Nobody is interested a real discussion.

That's one of my observations as well. In fact I don't think some even come on the threads to discuss - they come to spam and to attack - to argue - to fight.

The problem is that real ill-will is being created and those who are natural allies are turning into enemies. It may be that a political realignment is what will eventually happen here. There is genuine animosity between the sides here.

[dmw]

"New articles are not spam. They may be boring or annoying, but they're not spam. "

I disagree. When Rudybots post article after article here promoting RINO Rudy, it annoying and irritating--that's spam!

[motormouth]

A floating turd is more likable than Hillary or Obama...not so sure I would take this poll as an indication of much.


MM