Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Top Choice Among Both Moderate and Conservative Republicans (New Gallup Poll)
Gallup ^ | 3/20/07

Posted on 03/20/2007 8:21:54 AM PDT by areafiftyone

March 20, 2007

Giuliani Top Choice Among Both Moderate, Conservative Republicans

Gingrich, Romney do better among conservatives than moderates


by Jeffrey M. Jones

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- With the 2008 Republican presidential field beginning to come into shape, there are still questions and apparent opportunities for a favorite "conservative" candidate to emerge. The three leading announced contenders -- Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, and Mitt Romney -- have taken stances in the past that are out of step, if not unpopular, with conservative voters, although all have taken recent steps to try to reassure conservatives. The key question is whether conservatives will be able to look past any differences they may have with these candidates and support one of them for the nomination -- or hope that a more solidly conservative candidate emerges from the back of the pack or enters the race.

An analysis of Republicans' primary nomination preferences in recent Gallup Polls show that while conservative Republicans are less likely to support Rudy Giuliani than liberal or moderate Republicans, the former New York City mayor is the clear leader among both groups. John McCain, who is in second among both groups, also fares slightly better among moderates than conservatives. Though well behind the two leaders, Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney are much more likely to be supported by conservatives than moderates and liberals. At the same time, conservative and moderate Republicans' basic favorable ratings of Giuliani are highly positive and similar between the two groups, as are their ratings of McCain. Romney's favorable ratings are better among conservatives than moderate and liberal Republicans.

Nomination Preference by Ideology

Gallup combined data from its last two Republican nomination trial heats, conducted Feb. 9-11, 2007, and Mar. 2-4, 2007, to get a better sense of how the candidates fare among ideological groups. Both polls showed Giuliani leading among all Republicans over McCain by a healthy margin, with Gingrich third.

Since relatively few Republicans identify as liberals, the responses of liberals and moderates are combined into one group. Republicans are about twice as likely to identify as conservative when asked about their ideological leanings than as either moderate or liberal.

The analysis shows that Giuliani is the top choice among both conservative Republicans and liberal and moderate Republicans, though he has greater support among the latter group. McCain finishes second among both groups, and also polling slightly better among moderates and liberal Republicans.

Preference for 2008 Republican Presidential Nomination,
Results by Ideology

Aggregated Data From Feb. 9-11, 2007, and March 2-4, 2007, Surveys

Moderate/
Liberal Republicans

%

Conservative
Republicans

%

Rudy Giuliani

48

Rudy Giuliani

38

John McCain

26

John McCain

20

Mitt Romney

3

Newt Gingrich

14

George Pataki

2

Mitt Romney

8

Sam Brownback

2

Tommy Thompson

2

Newt Gingrich

2

 

Tommy Thompson

2

 

 

 

All others

3

All others

9

 

 

No preference

11

No preference

9

Giuliani and McCain are the only candidates with any significant support among moderate and liberal Republicans, with everyone else at 3% or less. On the other hand, Gingrich (14%) and Romney (8%) get higher support among conservative Republicans than liberal or moderate Republicans, but both trail the leading candidates by substantial margins among conservatives.

Gingrich has yet to make his presidential intentions known, saying he will decide whether to formally enter the race later this year. His showing among conservative Republicans indicates he could be a factor in the race, particularly since Republican primary and caucus voters are mostly conservative in their ideological orientation.

If Gingrich does not enter the race, Romney and Giuliani may benefit more than the other Republican candidates among conservatives. When the data are re-calculated by substituting Gingrich supporters' second choice for the nomination in place of their Gingrich vote, Giuliani's support among conservative Republicans increases to 43% (from 38%) and Romney pushes into the double digits at 11%. McCain's support is generally unchanged (21% compared to 20%) with Gingrich in the race. No other candidate gains more than a point in support among conservatives.

Preference for 2008 Republican Presidential Nomination,
Results by Ideology (Without Gingrich)

Aggregated Data From Feb. 9-11, 2007, and March 2-4, 2007, Surveys

Moderate/
Liberal Republicans

%

Conservative
Republicans

%

Rudy Giuliani

49%

Rudy Giuliani

43%

John McCain

27%

John McCain

21%

Mitt Romney

3%

Mitt Romney

11%

George Pataki

3%

Sam Brownback

2%

Sam Brownback

2%

Duncan Hunter

2%

Tommy Thompson

2%

Tommy Thompson

2%

 

Tom Tancredo

2%

 

 

All others

4%

All others

7%

 

 

No preference

11%

No preference

10%

Favorable Ratings of Candidates

In addition to measuring the candidates' current support for the nomination, Gallup has also asked Republicans for their overall opinions (favorable or unfavorable) of the leading contenders in the last two months. In general, Giuliani (80%) is viewed more favorably than McCain (68%) by Republicans regardless of their ideology. Eighty percent of both conservative and moderate Republicans have a favorable opinion of Giuliani. McCain's favorable ratings are 66% among moderate and liberal Republicans and 69% among conservative Republicans.

While Republicans' opinions of both Giuliani and McCain are similar by ideology, there is more variation in views of Romney, though the difference is largely due to conservatives being more familiar with him than moderates and liberals. Among conservative Republicans, 38% view Romney favorably, 13% unfavorably, and 49% do not know him well enough to give a rating. Among moderate and liberal Republicans, 23% have a favorable view, 11% an unfavorable one, and 66% cannot rate him.

Favorable Ratings for 2008 Republican Presidential Nomination,
Results by Ideology

Aggregated Data From Feb. 9-11, 2007, and March 2-4, 2007, Surveys

Favorable

Un-
favorable

No
opinion

%

%

%

Rudy Giuliani

 

 

 

All Republicans

80

11

10

Moderate/Liberal

80

7

13

Conservative

80

13

8

 

 

 

John McCain

 

 

 

All Republicans

68

19

13

Moderate/Liberal

66

17

17

Conservative

69

21

10

 

 

 

Mitt Romney

 

 

 

All Republicans

32

12

56

Moderate/Liberal

23

11

66

Conservative

38

13

49

Gingrich's favorable ratings were asked in just one poll, the March 2-4, 2007, poll. Fifty-four percent of Republicans viewed him favorably and 30% unfavorably in that poll, with 16% not having an opinion. Thus, Republicans give Gingrich the highest negative rating among the leading candidates. The data suggest that he is viewed much more favorably by conservative Republicans than by moderate and liberal Republicans so he may not be quite as vulnerable in the primaries as the overall data suggest. Gingrich would have a much harder time in the general election, though, as he is the only leading contender of either party who has a net negative favorable rating (29% favorable and 49% unfavorable) among all Americans.

The favorable ratings show that conservative Republicans are apparently quite comfortable with both Giuliani and McCain -- both are given positive reviews by more than two-thirds of conservative Republicans. That would indicate that there may not be a substantial push to draft a conservative candidate among the Republican rank and file. However, that is not to say that if one emerges in the next several months that the candidate could not be competitive with the current group of frontrunners.

Survey Methods

These results are based on telephone interviews with a randomly selected national sample of 849 Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, aged 18 and older, conducted Feb. 9-11, 2007, and Mar. 2-4, 2007. For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of error attributable to sampling and other random effects is ±4 percentage points.

Results based on the sample of 552 conservative Republicans have a maximum margin of sampling error of ±5 percentage points.

Results based on the sample of 289 moderate or liberal Republicans have a maximum margin of sampling error of ±6 percentage points.In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aol; bracewellgiuliani; conservativesforrudy; duncanhunter; duncanwho; duncanzero; electionpresident; elections; gallup; galluppolls; giuliani; hunter; justsayno2rudyrino; nochancehunter; rinorudyspam; romney; rudy; timewarner; twcable
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 441-448 next last
To: napscoordinator

>>>This report talks about a leak

And document shredding on our POWs.


>>>>but what does that have to do with Senator McCain's time as a POW?

You tell me. You brought that up, not me.


101 posted on 03/20/2007 10:12:14 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden

You act like the DBmedia with that pic. Pick an unflattering pic. People need to see him in action. He sets the right tone in response to Demonrats and the media and exudes warmth with his leadership style. Perfect balance. And don't ever compare Duncan Hunter to Howard Dean.


102 posted on 03/20/2007 10:14:16 AM PDT by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. IN 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Obviously the silent majority was overlooked..
Most probably ON PURPOSE... the brain wash continues..

Wonder what a poll of 30 million or more Legal and Illegal Aliens VOTING habits would produce?..
WHAT?.. what?.. Jeese it was just a question..

103 posted on 03/20/2007 10:15:39 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains
Why can't conservatives be happy that a moderate conservative will beat Hillary and Osama Obama like drums?

It's called...PRINCIPLES, MORALS, ETHICS...and UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTION.

I simply refuse to sell out to the devil or the devil-lite candidates (that does include Rudy).

104 posted on 03/20/2007 10:16:19 AM PDT by politicalwit (Family values don't stop at the border...but Federal laws do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

lol. I don't know. I hope more of this comes out during the primaries so that I get the truth no matter what it is.


105 posted on 03/20/2007 10:16:30 AM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Merry

Well, Fred Thompson is currently a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. That indicates to me that he understands classical economics, something a big government protectionist like Hunter does not. Thompson is also on the record defending social conservatism, and understands the war on terror.

In short, Thompson is probably as closest to Reagan as we're going to get. I'm skeptical if Thompson can do the mechanics-- fundraising, building the ground team, winning the debates, building political friendships, handling 24/7 attacks from the Clinton War Room and their allies in the War Room. But I'm open-minded and may be surprised.

Giuliani's still my guy for the time being-- he reminds the public of 911, makes a convincing argument to fight the WOT in understandable terms, and will have the widest margin of victory, which will help up take back the Congress. Whether Rudy can make it out of the primaries once the NARAL and anti-gun stuff hits the airwaves remains to be seen.


106 posted on 03/20/2007 10:16:49 AM PDT by JHBowden (President Giuliani in 2008! Law and Order. Solid Judges. Free Markets. Killing Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: A Strict Constructionist

Oh I will never join him and I continue to fight (about to be thrown off Lucianne if I don't miss my guess) but I think it's clear we are fighting a losing battle.


107 posted on 03/20/2007 10:17:33 AM PDT by NucSubs (Rudy Giuliani 2008! Our liberal democrat is better than theirs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden
Clinton War Room and their allies in the media ... damn I wish FR had an edit function!
108 posted on 03/20/2007 10:18:44 AM PDT by JHBowden (President Giuliani in 2008! Law and Order. Solid Judges. Free Markets. Killing Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator; Cailleach

Not the military people I know.


109 posted on 03/20/2007 10:18:45 AM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: massadvj

I know Newt has no chance due to his already being a 'name' but not liked by the public and not helping himself with his sex scandal while Speaker as Clintoon's impeachment was going on. Now, let us in on why Hunter is unelectable? I seriously want you people to lay it out why Hunter is supposedly unelectable. Fred Thompson isn't going to cut it either because he isn't as big a star as you seem to think. Law and Order doesn't have that many viewers and he will have to sell the war having missed his opportunity to serve his country and Republicans are going to have to answer for that during this election in selling Iraq to the people.


110 posted on 03/20/2007 10:18:48 AM PDT by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. IN 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Sadly, the information is all out there. The media doesn't cover it.


111 posted on 03/20/2007 10:19:29 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O
The train has left the station.

That train left without many of the passengers. Those passengers that didn't get on that train will be very happy when the train derails, that they weren't on board!

They will be glad they took the one on the right track instead of the one off to the left.

112 posted on 03/20/2007 10:19:50 AM PDT by dforest (Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O
The anti-Rudyites keep trying to distort his record, but most people can see through their bias.

Rudy did some good stuff in NY. I'm sure he made some mistakes too, as he is a human being like the rest of us.

My issues with Rudy revolve around the social issues. . .

and his 'history'. If Rudy manages to get the nomination, there's a great deal of dirty laundry he's going to have to deal with. The Dems won't show the least bit of mercy, of course. I truly think that is what would cause Rudy to lose the general election.

If he does get the nomination, I would vote for him in the general election. But I do think he'll lose.

113 posted on 03/20/2007 10:20:40 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

The entire Military is behind McCain and that is a pretty large voting block.


Entire???! Are you sure about that? Because the Military member I am married to sure isn't.


114 posted on 03/20/2007 10:22:03 AM PDT by Cailleach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
Duncan Hunter remains the best possible candidate. Although it is disturbing that so many Republicans are apparently ignorant to who Duncan Hunter is, I think it will be something when they get a chance to see him during the debates. The man is a natural leader and give it time we can see change. Debates and more campaigning. That is what it is about.



Baloney!! Duncan Hunter is an obscure Congressman who doesn't have a chance in hell of winning the presidency. He has no name recognition, no experience and a vote for him is a vote for Hillary. No thanks!! I'll vote for a man who has proved he can LEAD. And who has proved he can WIN!

Rudy '08
115 posted on 03/20/2007 10:22:32 AM PDT by KATIE-O (A Conservative Republican for Rudy Giuliani.'08 ( and I still despise Liberals!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
1. "National" polls count for nothing. If they did, Colin Powell would be President.

2. Let's see what happens in January and February, especially if Fred starts campaigning.

116 posted on 03/20/2007 10:23:48 AM PDT by Clemenza (NO to Rudy in 2008! New York's Values are NOT America's Values!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

All those #'s go to S#it when Fred Thompson get's added to the mix.


117 posted on 03/20/2007 10:25:01 AM PDT by roaddog727 (BullS##t does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
Duncan Hunter has gone from 1-2% to less then 1...an asterisk.

He prolly won't even be invited to the debates ...he's got no chance.
118 posted on 03/20/2007 10:26:20 AM PDT by Blackirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
""conducted Feb. 9-11, 2007, and Mar. 2-4, 2007"

When the new news doesn't work for the liberals, they recirculate the old news. On average, this data is more than a month old, and they release it now?

And how about a comparison of the February data with the March data so's we could look at trends? Or isn't that a positive thing for the liberals and therefore buried?

What a crappy way to run a "prestigious" polling operation.

119 posted on 03/20/2007 10:26:29 AM PDT by cookcounty (McCain: Tireless and passionate advocate for conservative causes like:________________________.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cyclopean Squid

"BINGO"
Go directly to the head of the class.


120 posted on 03/20/2007 10:27:17 AM PDT by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 441-448 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson