Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forbes: Social Issues Won't Derail Rudy
Human Events Online | March 30, 2007 | John Gizzi

Posted on 03/30/2007 2:53:04 PM PDT by poisonivy27

The most high-profile national conservative leader to endorse Rudy Giuliani for President so far insists that the former New York mayor's non-conservative stands on social issues such as abortion won't derail his candidacy in the Republican nomination process next year.

"I've met with several social conservatives and they are leaning strongly to Rudy," said Steve Forbes, publisher and two-time GOP presidential hopeful, who has just come out for Giuliani for President. Although he said he couldn't give the names of most of those he has talked to who are poised to join the Giuliani bandwagon, Forbes did cite Joel Rosenberg -- evangelical Christian, best-selling novelist, and a veteran of past Forbes campaigns -- who was prepared to join Giuliani's campaign team. In Forbes' words, "He thinks Rudy's the real deal, as do at least two others I'm talking to. Giuliani will have a [conservative] team in formation."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; elections; endorsement; forbes; giuliani; misterpresident; president; rudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-182 next last
To: Swordfished
It's your duty as a party member to go with the majority of party members.

Jawohl, Herr Kommissar.

81 posted on 03/31/2007 6:56:28 AM PDT by Petronski (FRED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Swordfished; Petronski

I and many others place principles over party, and this is why in 2003 I left the Republican party. I am now a conservative independent.


82 posted on 03/31/2007 7:00:05 AM PDT by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: JHBowden
I'm not willing to throw away 200 years of history because I disagree with a candidate on two or three issues.

You don't get it.

Re-read some of the responses on this thread.

This is the PRIMARIES. In the PRIMARIES, you support the most conservative Republican candidate whose conservatism can appeal to independents and non-voters. You don't support the most LIBERAL Republican in the field and then tell conservatives that they need to blindly support him.

And like another poster said, if Rudy wins the nomination, I'll cross that bridge when it comes. But for now, Rudy should NOT be getting conservatives' support.

83 posted on 03/31/2007 7:38:26 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Remember, don't shoot food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TET1968

I think it's "Donut".
And the hateful, bigoted ,Hillery promoting ostriches who are hyping this entry level strawman are called "Donut Holes".

:) That has a ring to it....lol


84 posted on 03/31/2007 9:17:17 AM PDT by KATIE-O (Rudy Giuliani - Restoring Optimism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

This is the PRIMARIES. In the PRIMARIES, you support the most conservative Republican candidate whose conservatism can appeal to independents and non-voters. You don't support the most LIBERAL Republican in the field and then tell conservatives that they need to blindly support him.

It's not that simple for me. I am going to consider the candidates leadership qualities, his past record, his ability to reach a majority of Republicans and Independents with his message. In other words, can he win the election? There are some Republicans who are "very conservative" who don't stand a chance of winning the big prize. They are off my list.


85 posted on 03/31/2007 9:28:03 AM PDT by KATIE-O (Rudy Giuliani - Restoring Optimism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Excuse me, but I think that we should first do what`s best for the country


86 posted on 03/31/2007 9:45:14 AM PDT by neverhillorat (HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Wonder how many times a day some one is called treasonous on this blog? It`s losing its meaning boys and girls.
87 posted on 03/31/2007 9:48:26 AM PDT by neverhillorat (HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: neverhillorat
Excuse me, but I think that we should first do what`s best for the country

What's best for the country is put a conservative in office. I'd prefer to do that in 2008. But, if the only choices are Hiltery and Julie-Anna, the only hope for conservative in the White House would be in 2012 if the former won.

88 posted on 03/31/2007 9:49:09 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

We can`t survive four years of Ms Clinton. To make things worse, Bubba is part of that package.


89 posted on 03/31/2007 9:56:49 AM PDT by neverhillorat (HILLORAT WINS, WE ALL LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock; Petronski
I and many others place principles over party, and this is why in 2003 I left the Republican party. I am now a conservative independent.

I applaud you for doing so. When you get a working political majority, then you'll have a say in what happens.

I am also an independent. If it weren't for polls, I'd 'vote my conscience'. Since we have the reality of polls, we know that the candidacy comes down to two people, sometimes three. At that point one ought to vote against the worst, or for the best of, the realistic candidates.

In an ideal world, there would be no polls, everyone would just vote their conscience...but this is not a ideal world.

90 posted on 03/31/2007 10:12:10 AM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: neverhillorat
We can`t survive four years of Ms Clinton. To make things worse, Bubba is part of that package.

We survived eight years of Slick Willie, two with a Democratic congress. In fact, it was during that time, Republicans swept into power and we got our first balanced budget in decades.

91 posted on 03/31/2007 10:27:39 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
So who is your candidate that we can all support? I'd like to support someone a little more conservative that can WIN and beat Hillary. PLEASE PRODUCE THAT PERSON soon. PLEASE!!!!

Most are waiting for Duncan Hunter to rise beyond his asterisk status, others are supporting equally unelectable candidates, and unannounced candidates. There are even some claiming to be Conservatives that will vote for Hillary over Rudy... you are asking the impossible of the "unappeasables." They have no real candidate.

92 posted on 03/31/2007 11:36:57 AM PDT by DKNY ("You may have to fight a battle more than once to win it." --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
You're a flaming social liberal. Of course you like Rudy.

You need to take your christal ball in for a tune up, Miss Cleo!!

93 posted on 03/31/2007 11:48:16 AM PDT by KATIE-O (Rudy Giuliani - Restoring Optimism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DKNY

Thanks for that reasonable response. It's what I thought.


94 posted on 03/31/2007 11:50:11 AM PDT by Gracey (Giuliani vs Hillary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O; JCEccles

That is my take on it as well. Rino Rudy will not get much traction in the south


95 posted on 03/31/2007 11:50:45 AM PDT by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
That is my take on it as well. Rino Rudy will not get much traction in the south

He's getting plenty of traction and will get even more if he chooses a very conservative running mate.

96 posted on 03/31/2007 11:53:28 AM PDT by KATIE-O (Rudy Giuliani - Restoring Optimism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O

NO conservative worth the name would ever side with such a flaming liberal.


97 posted on 03/31/2007 11:57:30 AM PDT by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
NO conservative worth the name would ever side with such a flaming liberal.

You are in for a big surprise.

98 posted on 03/31/2007 11:59:00 AM PDT by KATIE-O (Rudy Giuliani - Restoring Optimism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O

We shall see, it is a long way until the primaries.


99 posted on 03/31/2007 12:03:12 PM PDT by Hydroshock (Duncan Hunter For President, checkout gohunter08.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O
It looks like conservative Republicans are willing to give Rudy a pass on his less than strict conservative social politics, rather than face a Billary White House for another 8 miserable years. So am I.

Based on your comment it appears you don't count yourself among conservative Republicans. How would you describe your politics?

100 posted on 03/31/2007 12:20:12 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson